8000 [Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.7-slim to 3.12.11-slim by benjaminhuo · Pull Request #13 · OpenFunction/functions-framework-python-gcp · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.7-slim to 3.12.11-slim #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.7-slim to 3.12.11-slim #13

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

benjaminhuo
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • examples/cloud_run_event/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.12.11-slim, as this image has only 40 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN12-GLIBC-5927132		   829  
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN12-GLIBC-5927132		   829  
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN12-GLIBC-6210098		   721  
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN12-GLIBC-6210098		   721  
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-7411315		   714  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested a review from tpiperatgod June 12, 2025 05:06
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tpiperatgod tpiperatgod Awaiting requested review from tpiperatgod

Assignees

@benjaminhuo benjaminhuo

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@benjaminhuo @CLAassistant @snyk-bot
0