8000 Enhance MFA multi-device testing on troubleshoot and revoke pages by DylanDylann · Pull Request #84016 · Expensify/App · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Enhance MFA multi-device testing on troubleshoot and revoke pages#84016

Merged
chuckdries merged 53 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
DylanDylann:Dylan-enhance-troubleshoot-revoke
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

Enhance MFA multi-device testing on troubleshoot and revoke pages#84016
chuckdries merged 53 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
DylanDylann:Dylan-enhance-troubleshoot-revoke

Conversation

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor
@DylanDylann DylanDylann commented Mar 3, 2026

Explanation of Change

Taking over #83488 from @rafecolton

Enhance troubleshooting and device revocation page to:

  1. Make it more clear whether the current device is registered
  2. Revoke on the Troubleshoot page now only revokes the current device
  3. On the device revocation page, you can revoke the current device, other devices, or all devices (whichever are eligible)

Fixed Issues

$ #83482
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open android, iOS, and web, all on the same account
  2. Visit the Troubleshoot page on each
  3. Use Test to register the iOS device - observe the text go from Never registered to Another device registered on android and web.
  4. Register android, observe the status on web go to Other devices registered
  5. Revoke iOS and observe Android is not revoked.
  6. Navigate to Security > Face/Fingerprint & Passkey on android, observe a row for "This device" and the button says "Revoke access"
  7. Re-register iOS. Notice a "One other device" row appear on android.
  8. On web, navigate to Security > Face/Fingerprint & Passkey, observe one row with "Two other devices"
  9. Navigate to "Security > Face/Fingerprint & Passkey" on iOS and observe two rows - one other device, one this device
  10. Revoke one other device from iOS. Notice web changes to "One other device" and android's "This device" row disappears
  11. Tap "Revoke access" on web and notice iOS now disappears too
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A, online only

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-03-04.at.18.37.40.mov
Screen.Recording.2026-03-04.at.18.40.14.mp4

rafecolton and others added 30 commits February 27, 2026 16:50
- Fix ESLint prefer-at error in en.ts (use .at() instead of bracket notation)
- Fix type error in API types by using RevokeMultifactorAuthenticationCredentialsParams
- Add missing translation keys to all non-English language files:
  - biometricsTest: statusNotRegistered, statusRegisteredOtherDevice, statusRegisteredThisDevice
  - revoke: thisDevice, otherDevices
- Add missing Spanish translations: statusNeverRegistered, confirmationPromptAll, ctaAll
- Fix Spanish troubleshootBiometricsStatus to use status param instead of registered

Co-authored-by: {"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"} <{"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"}@users.noreply.github.com>
The previous commit inadvertently changed Unicode quote characters in the
French translation file, breaking Prettier parsing. This restores the
original characters and re-adds only the missing translation keys.

Co-authored-by: Rafe Colton <rafecolton@users.noreply.github.com>
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JakubKorytko All resolved/replied

Copy link
Contributor
@JakubKorytko JakubKorytko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rafecolton
Copy link
Member

@DylanDylann I'm getting the same error on the German translation:

Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 9 48 34 AM

@MelvinBot can you please analyze the above issue and recommend a fix? A few specific instructions:

  1. Do not directly apply the fix, simply explain here.
  2. Include a diff that will apply the fix using a code block with "patch" as the language.
  3. Included any Spanish translations needed for this change in your diff

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Contributor

Analysis

Root cause: The generateTranslations script fails with:

Error: Cannot inject into path "statusRegisteredOtherDevice.one": property "statusRegisteredOtherDevice" exists but is not an object

The script detects statusRegisteredOtherDevice as a new key added in en.ts. It decomposes the pluralized arrow function () => ({one: ..., other: ...}) into two separate injection paths: statusRegisteredOtherDevice.one and statusRegisteredOtherDevice.other.

When it tries to inject these into the non-English language files, it finds that statusRegisteredOtherDevice already exists (manually added by DylanDylann) as an arrow function node, not an object literal. The script's AST injection logic can only inject sub-properties into object literals, so it throws the error.

This affects ALL non-English language files, not just German — each one has the same manually-added arrow function.

Fix: Remove the manually-added statusRegisteredOtherDevice line from all non-English language files, then re-run the translation script. The script will generate the translations fresh for all supported languages.

For Spanish (which the script can't auto-generate), the translation needs to be added back manually after the script runs.

diff --git a/src/languages/de.ts b/src/languages/de.ts
--- a/src/languages/de.ts
+++ b/src/languages/de.ts
@@ -699,7 +699,6 @@
             statusNeverRegistered: 'Nie registriert',
             statusNotRegistered: 'Nicht registriert',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Weiteres Gerät registriert', other: 'Andere Geräte registriert'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Registriert',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/es.ts b/src/languages/es.ts
--- a/src/languages/es.ts
+++ b/src/languages/es.ts
@@ -555,7 +555,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'No registrado',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Otro dispositivo registrado', other: 'Otros dispositivos registrados'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Registrado',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/fr.ts b/src/languages/fr.ts
--- a/src/languages/fr.ts
+++ b/src/languages/fr.ts
@@ -701,7 +701,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'Non enregistré',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Un autre appareil enregistré', other: 'Autres appareils enregistrés'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Enregistré',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/it.ts b/src/languages/it.ts
--- a/src/languages/it.ts
+++ b/src/languages/it.ts
@@ -699,7 +699,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'Non registrato',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Un altro dispositivo registrato', other: 'Altri dispositivi registrati'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Registrato',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/ja.ts b/src/languages/ja.ts
--- a/src/languages/ja.ts
+++ b/src/languages/ja.ts
@@ -698,7 +698,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: '未登録',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: '他のデバイスが登録済み', other: '他のデバイスが登録済み'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: '登録済み',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/nl.ts b/src/languages/nl.ts
--- a/src/languages/nl.ts
+++ b/src/languages/nl.ts
@@ -698,7 +698,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'Niet geregistreerd',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Een ander apparaat geregistreerd', other: 'Andere apparaten geregistreerd'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Geregistreerd',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/pl.ts b/src/languages/pl.ts
--- a/src/languages/pl.ts
+++ b/src/languages/pl.ts
@@ -698,7 +698,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'Nie zarejestrowano',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Inne urządzenie zarejestrowane', other: 'Inne urządzenia zarejestrowane'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Zarejestrowano',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
--- a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
+++ b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
@@ -697,7 +697,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: 'Não registrado',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Outro dispositivo registrado', other: 'Outros dispositivos registrados'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: 'Registrado',
         },
diff --git a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
--- a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
+++ b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
@@ -691,7 +691,6 @@
             statusNotRegistered: '未注册',
-            statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: '另一台设备已注册', other: '其他设备已注册'}),
             statusRegisteredThisDevice: '已注册',
         },

After applying this patch and re-running the translation script, the script will auto-generate statusRegisteredOtherDevice for all supported languages. Since the script doesn't generate Spanish, you'll need to manually add the Spanish translation back afterward:

// In src/languages/es.ts, inside biometricsTest:
statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Otro dispositivo registrado', other: 'Otros dispositivos registrados'}),

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MelvinBot Removing statusRegisteredOtherDevice caused the TypeScript check to fail

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Contributor

I investigated the failing typecheck — here's what I found:

Root Cause: The new key statusRegisteredOtherDevice was added to en.ts (line 706) and es.ts (line 558), but is missing from 8 other language files. Since all language files must match the type shape of en.ts, TypeScript errors with TS2741: Property 'statusRegisteredOtherDevice' is missing.

Affected files (each needs statusRegisteredOtherDevice added between statusNotRegistered and statusRegisteredThisDevice):

  • src/languages/de.ts (line ~701)
  • src/languages/fr.ts (line ~682)
  • src/languages/it.ts (line ~680)
  • src/languages/ja.ts (line ~679)
  • src/languages/nl.ts (line ~679)
  • src/languages/pl.ts (line ~679)
  • src/languages/pt-BR.ts (line ~678)
  • src/languages/zh-hans.ts (line ~672)

Fix: Add the statusRegisteredOtherDevice plural translation to each file. The pattern from en.ts:

statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Another device registered', other: 'Other devices registered'}),

Each language file needs its own translated version of this key, following the same plural function pattern used in es.ts:

statusRegisteredOtherDevice: () => ({one: 'Otro dispositivo registrado', other: 'Otros dispositivos registrados'}),

⚠️ I can't push changes to this PR because I didn't open it and I'm not listed as an assignee. To have me make this fix, add me to the PR assignees and then retry your request.

@DylanDylann DylanDylann force-pushed the Dylan-enhance-troubleshoot-revoke branch from dbfb6ad to e3d2612 Compare March 9, 2026 18:33
chuckdries
chuckdries previously approved these changes Mar 9, 2026
Copy link
Contributor
@chuckdries chuckdries left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good overall, small NAB

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failed Eslint on main, I will merge new main when it's resolved

Copy link
Contributor
@chuckdries chuckdries left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good; translation files appear to be in the correct state

@chuckdries
Copy link
Contributor
chuckdries commented Mar 10, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
improved.revoke.android.mp4
iOS: Native
improved.revoke.ios.mp4

@chuckdries chuckdries merged commit 05a9112 into Expensify:main Mar 10, 2026
30 of 32 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @chuckdries has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/chuckdries in version: 9.3.36-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.36-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

0