8000 Serverless GCP high level structure by apiarian-datadog · Pull Request #29415 · DataDog/documentation · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Serverless GCP high level structure #29415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: aleksandr.pasechnik/serverless-gcp-docs-refresh
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

apiarian-datadog
Copy link
Contributor
@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog commented May 19, 2025

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Set up a high level structure for our new Serverless GPC docs.

Merge instructions

Please note that this is being merged into our long-running branch which can be found here: #29407

@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog requested review from a team as code owners May 19, 2025 15:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend label May 19, 2025
@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog force-pushed the aleksandr.pasechnik/high-level-structure branch from c2bee07 to 44acca6 Compare May 19, 2025 15:39
@domalessi domalessi added the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label May 19, 2025
@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog force-pushed the aleksandr.pasechnik/high-level-structure branch from 44acca6 to 88cf8bc Compare May 19, 2025 21:16
@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog changed the title wip: Serverless GCP docs foundation Serverless GCP high level structure May 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0