8000 [DOCS-9956] Add Cloud SIEM OCSF doc by maycmlee · Pull Request #28964 · DataDog/documentation · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[DOCS-9956] Add Cloud SIEM OCSF doc #28964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

[DOCS-9956] Add Cloud SIEM OCSF doc #28964

merged 6 commits into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

maycmlee
Copy link
Contributor
@maycmlee maycmlee commented Apr 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

  • Adds Cloud SIEM OCSF doc
  • Adds nav item

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:
Merge queue is enabled in this repo. Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass in CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

To have your PR automatically merged after it receives the required reviews, add the following PR comment:

/merge

Additional notes

@maycmlee maycmlee added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Apr 24, 2025
@maycmlee maycmlee requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2025 18:49
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend label Apr 24, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

New or renamed files

drichards-87
drichards-87 requested changes Apr 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@drichards-87 drichards-87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Just had a few minor suggestions.

@maycmlee @drichards-87
Apply suggestions from code review
f07b26b 
Co-authored-by: DeForest Richards <56796055+drichards-87@users.noreply.github.com>
@maycmlee maycmlee requested a review from drichards-87 April 28, 2025 15:06
@maycmlee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @drichards-87! I committed all of your suggestions.

@maycmlee
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented May 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-05-13 18:32:48 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-05-13 18:32:53 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-05-13 18:33:26 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 20m (p90).

2025-05-13 18:53:17 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit b350474 into master May 13, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the may/cloud-siem-ocsf branch May 13, 2025 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@drichards-87 drichards-87 drichards-87 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review mergequeue-status: done
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@maycmlee @drichards-87
0