8000 Update GRACE docs for integration-service by oliviashiah · Pull Request #28350 · DataDog/documentation · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Update GRACE docs for integration-service #28350

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 23, 2025
Merged

Update GRACE docs for integration-service #28350

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 23, 2025

Conversation

oliviashiah
Copy link
Contributor
@oliviashiah oliviashiah commented Mar 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Update GRACE public docs to include Integration Service, following these docs: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AAA/pages/2532147341/Adding+Granular+Access+Controls+to+a+New+Product#6.-Update-the-public-documentation

Integration Service applies to a lot of different integrations, so I just linked it to the generic integration page - let me know if we should change the link.

Merge instructions

We will wait to merge this until we release GRACE for opsgenie.

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:
Merge queue is enabled in this repo. Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass in CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

To have your PR automatically merged after it receives the required reviews, add the following PR comment:

/merge

Additional notes

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@oliviashiah oliviashiah marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 12:49
@oliviashiah oliviashiah requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 12:49
@oliviashiah
Copy link
Contributor Author
oliviashiah commented Apr 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

DO NOT MERGE UNTIL GRACE OPSGENIE GA!! Thanks :)

Edit: ok to merge!

@oliviashiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented Apr 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-23 19:42:19 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-04-23 19:42:24 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-04-23 21:48:09 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 18m (p90).

2025-04-23 22:03:49 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@buraizu
Copy link
Contributor
buraizu commented Apr 23, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented Apr 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-23 20:41:53 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-04-23 20:41:55 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status waiting

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit ca4a66f into master Apr 23, 2025
16 of 20 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the olivia.shiah/COLAB-1831/grace-integration-service-documentation branch April 23, 2025 22:03
estherk15 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
@oliviashiah @estherk15
Update GRACE docs for integration-service (#28350)
6065b9f 
* update grace docs

* add integration service

* plural

* update ordering to be alphabetical
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman hestonhoffman approved these changes

@estherk15 estherk15 estherk15 approved these changes

@sanjaythakkar-dd sanjaythakkar-dd sanjaythakkar-dd approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
mergequeue-status: done
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@oliviashiah @buraizu @hestonhoffman @estherk15 @sanjaythakkar-dd
0