-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
Extended appsec request/response headers collection < 8000 span class="f1-light color-fg-muted">#8724
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09b77c3
WIP
jandro996 97433cd
Update dd-trace-api/src/main/java/datadog/trace/api/config/AppSecConf…
jandro996 e6cb2dd
Update dd-trace-api/src/main/java/datadog/trace/api/config/AppSecConf…
jandro996 37a5094
Update dd-trace-api/src/main/java/datadog/trace/api/config/AppSecConf…
jandro996 bcac4de
Merge branch 'master' into alejandro.gonzalez/WaPo-headers
jandro996 4e995e9
fix smoke tests
jandro996 1989174
rollback properties changes
jandro996 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
F
8000
ailed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So can we also clarify in the PR description that, right now, if redaction is enabled, we do not collect headers at all?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes! I'm going to clarify this. Until a new RFC establish how to deal with redaction on those cases we prefer to avoid collection of potential sensitive data. So long story sort to enable this feature we need
DD_APPSEC_COLLECT_ALL_HEADERS
= true andDD_APPSEC_HEADER_COLLECTION_REDACTION_ENABLED
= false