[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE]: Adding Streebog hashing algorithm #485

Open
volkdm opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #525
Open

[FEATURE]: Adding Streebog hashing algorithm #485

volkdm opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #525
Labels
proposed core enhancement RFC notice sent A public RFC notice was distributed to the CycloneDX mailing list for consideration
Milestone

Comments

@volkdm
Copy link
volkdm commented Jun 17, 2024

Streebog hashing algorithm is widely used in Russia (national standard GOST R 34.11-2012). The function is also described in ISO/IEC 10118-3:2018 and RFC 6986. see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6986

It is proposed to add Streebog-256 and Streebog-512 to the hashAlg field along with other algorithms that the CycloneDX specification supports.

@stevespringett
Copy link
Member

The 1.7-dev branch is open for contributions.

volkdm added a commit to volkdm/cyclonedx-specification that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
volkdm added a commit to volkdm/cyclonedx-specification that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
@volkdm volkdm linked a pull request Sep 26, 2024 that will close this issue
@jkowalleck jkowalleck linked a pull request Sep 26, 2024 that will close this issue
@stevespringett stevespringett added the RFC notice sent A public RFC notice was distributed to the CycloneDX mailing list for consideration label Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposed core enhancement RFC notice sent A public RFC notice was distributed to the CycloneDX mailing list for consideration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants