Papers by Bernhard Kleeberg
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The title of this issue of Science in Context – “Believing Nature, Knowing God” – is intended to ... more The title of this issue of Science in Context – “Believing Nature, Knowing God” – is intended to suggest the moral, emotional, and cognitive conditions in which the historical alliance of “nature” and “God” operated, and to make a more general point about knowing and believing. The production of scientific knowledge includes mechanisms for bringing about acceptance that such knowledge is true, and thus for generating a psychological state of belief. To claim to have knowledge of nature involves an attitude of belief in certain epistemic values, in the procedures associated with them, and in the results to which they lead. “Nature,” both as a totality to be known, and as the sum of the results of research directed towards it, turns out to be an object of belief.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Nature and Scripture in the Abrahamic Religions: 1700-Present, 2008
This chapter intends to map out the boundary disputes between Protestant German theology and Darw... more This chapter intends to map out the boundary disputes between Protestant German theology and Darwinism. It discusses positions ranging from monistic-idealistic approaches that totally converged with Darwinism to orthodox approaches that claimed the absolute incompatibility of science and religion, as well as various attempts at stressing their epistemological complementarity or independence. Darwin?s originality, according to Ernst Haeckel, merely consisted in having introduced natural selection as a second mechanism alongside Lamarck?s inheritance of characters acquired through the use and disuse of organs. Provoked by the polemical position of Haeckel and his followers, many theologians did not follow David Friedrich Strauss?s Speculative Christology, but openly denied the possibility of reconciling Darwinism and Christianity. The teleological interpretation of evolutionism becomes even more evident in Albrecht Ritschl?s disciple Rudolf Otto, professor of systematic theology in Gottingen. Keywords: Albrecht Ritschl; Christianity; Darwinism; David Friedrich Strauss; Ernst Haeckel; Protestant German theology
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Stan Rzeczy, 2019
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
What sounds like a laborious set up for a shallow joke actually hits the core of the problem this... more What sounds like a laborious set up for a shallow joke actually hits the core of the problem this issue covers: What do the leading archaeologist of the former German Democratic Republic in re-unifying Germany, Bulgarian scientists in the late 1960s and some recent discussions about representations of Polish ancient history have in common? They all operate along fractures in the crust of scientific authority, they mark moments in time when classical figures of knowledge reach or breach authoritative status. They serve to study how authoritative speech bridged and manifested these relations and help identify areas where scientific authority is contested. This volume transcends this topological rhetoric with a praxeological take on scientific authority. Concentrating on authority figures, it brings specific margins and contestations into sight. The papers in this volume study cases from former socialist countries of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe, and thus examples that present us with the complexity of agonal relations within state socialism and post-socialist transformations that complicate matters of scientific authority in many ways, yet also offer illustrative examples of shifting constellations of (scientific) authority.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Erzählen
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte/History of Science and Humanities 44(4), 2021
What sounds like a laborious set up for a shallow joke actually hits the core of the problem this... more What sounds like a laborious set up for a shallow joke actually hits the core of the problem this issue covers: What do the leading archaeologist of the former German Democratic Republic in re-unifying Germany, Bulgarian scientists in the late 1960s and some recent discussions about representations of Polish ancient history have in common? They all operate along fractures in the crust of scientific authority, they mark moments in time when classical figures of knowledge reach or breach authoritative status. They serve to study how authoritative speech bridged and manifested these relations and help identify areas where scientific authority is contested. This volume transcends this topological rhetoric with a praxeological take on scientific authority. Concentrating on authority figures, it brings specific margins and contestations into sight. The papers in this volume study cases from former socialist countries of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe, and thus examples that present us with the complexity of agonal relations within state socialism and post-socialist transformations that complicate matters of scientific authority in many ways, yet also offer illustrative examples of shifting constellations of (scientific) authority.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
When the German translation of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published in 1860, it intens... more When the German translation of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published in 1860, it intensified a conflict that German theologians had been fighting since the early 19th century. Arguments against the secular relativising or even thorough dismissal of the scientific, philosophical and social importance of the bible now had to be supplemented with arguments against the anti-teleological consequences of Darwin’s theory. But though they all agreed in rejecting these consequences, German theologians considerably differed in respect to the epistemological status they granted to Darwinian and biblical accounts of man and nature. Whether they considered the truths of science and religion as corresponding, complementary, independent, or incompatible depended on their judgments on the relation between (scientific) facts, theories, and (cultural) convictions. These judgments were shaped in a specific way: Darwinism in Germany was mainly associated with Ernst Haeckel’s monistic evolutio...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Page 1. Bernhard Kleeberg THEOPHVSIS Ernst Haeckels Philosophie des Naturganzen bohlau Page 2. Pa... more Page 1. Bernhard Kleeberg THEOPHVSIS Ernst Haeckels Philosophie des Naturganzen bohlau Page 2. Page 3. Bernhard Kleeberg Theophysis Page 4. Page 5. Bernhard Kleeberg THEOPHYSIS Ernst Haeckels Philosophie ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Bernhard Kleeberg