Talk:pikey

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 8 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: June 2015–February 2016
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Does anyone have a reference for this first meaning of pikey? I have never met it and I am not convinced it is real. Whilst the pike looks like a simple weapon, it takes a lot of strength to hold and some skill and training to turn and maneovre it in battle. IceDragon64 09:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's just been taken to WT:RFV. Equinox 17:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I suspect it is current in historical reenactment societies Impregnable (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC).Reply
I've moved these citations of the "underclass, gypsies" sense out of the entry (replacing them with two citations of pikys, because it's not clear to me that the singular of pikies is pikey and not e.g. pikie or piky.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2955: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2955: Parameter 1 is required.
- -sche (discuss) 02:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: June 2015–February 2016

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: ‘A low-ranking soldier who merely carries a pike.’ Ƿidsiþ 16:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Clearly meant to be a diminutive of pikeman, and in that sense I found this this cite. It is, however, in the context of a coal mine pikeman rather than the type of soldier. SpinningSpark 22:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps the definition could be reworded to be more general. SpinningSpark 23:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I have reworded the definition, and added some cites, although one of them is a bit iffy. Kiwima (talk) 00:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Is pikies actually a plural as pikey? The only citations of the "fishing lure" sense use that spelling. "seventy-leven pikey men" is arguably a childish(?) rendering of "pike men", i.e. "pikey" itself is rendering "pike" and "men" is what carries the meaning "men" (rather than "pikey" meaning "pikeman"). - -sche (discuss) 01:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
The "underclass" sense suffers from the same problem. I've added them to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 02:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
The "underclass" sense is cited now, as is the "fish" sense and the verb. The "lure" and "pikeman" senses are not adequately cited, because these citations have issues (discussed above):
- -sche (discuss) 02:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed the "pikeman" and "lure" senses. - -sche (discuss) 02:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply