Talk:MO

RFV discussion: June–October 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

MO

Rfv-sense "moderate intellectual disability". I did a quick GB check, but 2 letter abbreviations are tricky. Added from blocked IP range. – Jberkel 17:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm not finding a whole lot of useful stuff but at least in this work they use MO/ID for it, which makes a lot more sense; why would you ever abbreviate moderate intellectual disability as MO? — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 18:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

That sounds odd. I wonder if someone misheard MR? I dont work in this field, but Ive had contact with people who do and I have only ever heard MR. Your link doesnt load for me .... but the longer term MOID does seem to exist, not always with a slash. Still, the sites Im seeing using MOID look like copypasted content, and only one of them is a school. —Soap— 21:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I've created MoID. This capitalization seems more common in the literature. I've also deliberately left the link red; moderate seems to have a precise technical definition in this context, so it's either a lightbulb or a fried egg. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 22:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

RFV failed – Jberkel 11:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)