Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet 9 Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 01:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Planet 9 Studios

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine coverage in unreliable sources. Lacks in-depth coverage per WP:SIRS. Fails WP:NCORP criteria. Anye Etimbia (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, Technology, Internet, Software, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - This is a bad faith submission from an inexperienced nominator with no prior edit history. I suspect he may have some kind of COI or personal vendetta. This company is one of the pioneers of VRML and online 3D graphics that has been around since the 90s. Unfortunately it is harder to find news articles from the 90s, but there is enough here to meet WP:GNG. they have coverage in Arizona Republic, Honolulu Advertiser, Daily Record, Venture Beat and The San Francisco Examiner.Fbiagent010 (talk) 23:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator only has 5 edits on his account, it sure is weird how he knows how to use AFD and stuff. This might be a sock or some vandal trying to prank random users. SparklyNights 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - almost certainly WP:UPE sockpuppet spam. MER-C 19:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Suspicions about the nominator or the article creator are not valid reasons for keeping or deleting. Commentary on sources and whether they support notability would be appreciated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The VentureBeat reference is good, but not seeing additional substantial coverage. Could merge to David Colleen. Flurrious (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Source 1 is fine, 2 and 3 are trivial. Rest seem primary or non-RS, source 9 looked ok but it isn't about this company. I can't find much more for sourcing; this is an older company, coverage seems to be from the early internet era, likely not archived. If we had a few more good sources, I'd reconsider Oaktree b (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wikpedia Library doesn't have much, there is a Planet 3 Studios and a Planet TV studios, nothing for Planet 9. Oaktree b (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.