[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Bagg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Bagg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG. Notability appears limited to a few, trival references in local newspapers. (nominated by KlayCax)

Delete. MisterWizzy (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with Shellwood's argument. There are only minor references to this person in local papers, in a "lifestyle" setting (a "Who's giving a free talk at the local library for Halloween" kind of thing). --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 00:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.