[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Widespread fatigue damage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Widespread fatigue caused the in-flight failure of the fuselage on Aloha Airlines Flight 243

Widespread fatigue damage (WFD) in a structure is characterised by the simultaneous presence of fatigue cracks at multiple points that are of sufficient size and density that while individually they may be acceptable, link-up of the cracks could suddenly occur and the structure could fail.[1] For example, small fatigue cracks developing along a row of fastener holes can coalesce increasing the stress on adjacent cracked sites increasing the rate of growth of those cracks. The objective of a designer is to determine when large numbers of small cracks could degrade the joint strength to an unacceptable level.[2] The in-flight loss of part of the fuselage from Aloha Airlines Flight 243 was attributed to multi-site fatigue damage.

Categories of WFD

[edit]

Several factors can influence the occurrence of WFD, like Design issues and Probabilistic parameters like manufacturing, environment etc. Two categories of WFD are:

Multi-Site Damage (MSD)

[edit]

MSD is the simultaneous presence of fatigue cracks in the same structural element.

Multi-Element Damage (MED)

[edit]

MED is the simultaneous presence of fatigue cracks in similar adjacent structural elements.

Difficulty in determining WFD occurrence

[edit]

Main difficulties involved are:

  • Cracks associated with MSD and MED are so small initially that they cannot be detected with existing inspection methods.
  • Fatigue cracks related to WFD grow rapidly. Therefore operators are not able to detect the cracks before they cause structural failure.

Rule to predict the occurrence of WFD

[edit]

First, a parameter called Limits Of Validity (LOV) is defined.[1] LOV is defined as “the period of time (in flight cycles, hours or both) up to which WFD will not occur in aeroplane structure.”

The steps followed are:

  • Evaluation of structural configurations and determination of LOV based on fatigue test evidence.
  • Provide warnings to preclude the development of WFD up to LOV.
  • Adopt LOV values as a criterion to determine the life of aeroplane.
  • Stop the operation of aeroplanes when LOV is reached.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Hoggard, Amos W.; Johnson, Stephen R. "Understanding the new Widespread fatigue damage rule". Boeing. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  2. ^ "Federal Register, Aging aeroplane program"