User talk:YuHuw

Hello, YuHuw, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cordless Larry (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

YuHuw, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi YuHuw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Karait shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Karaylar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Keraites ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The user who placed these ^ notices supports sockpuppets of User:Ancientsteppe [1] (see User:Toghuchar) [2] [3] etc., while he (even if asked many times to stop such harassment) relentlessly accuses everyone else of being sockpuppets in order to canvass support [4] against them if they touch any Karaite-related pages in any way the user does not like -e.g. clarifying helpful distinctions between Christian and Jewish groups. Since there just are too many examples just browse [5]. All this is his apparent pretext to being elusive when invited to discuss any POV he can not justify with facts (or if his misrepresentations of facts are challenged). Even if you try to be friendly by sending him thanks for his contributions :( Some people seem simply inclined to assume bad faith against wikipedians who challenge their word views, POVs and confirmation biases. Nevertheless my hand of friendship is still open to him should he realize his error. :)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prester John, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toghrul. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I have corrected it now :) YuHuw (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, YuHuw. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keraites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"YuHuw's" ridicilious Edit Wars

Except that his actions totally violates any WP rules including 3 reverts rules some of the are totaly ridicolius he also

1) He insists to to keep Dunlop's wrong translation of Keraits to Persian as Karaites Keraites page ,claiming (see Talk:Keraites) that this translation on other languages(using Kheraid) are mistaken translatioh of this English page(while actuallty thiese pages are writtent in different manner with RS at their languages. SO he erased the map that is "mistakenly" on all WP pages inn other languages,He claims that name Kheraid it turns out from google is only a Mongolian family name. From the other side he claims that Keraites translation as Keraitler from Turk Keraitpage is not acceptable as Original Reseearch.

2) Crimean Karaites hatnote change every time with different POV

3) Here he claims that translation to other languages need to be confirmed by RS. To my opinion Karaims translation in English is really misleading. I would prefer Karaims.It was decided this word after long discussion an search by google. Other Wikipedia pages direct to the Crimean Karaites page, including Russian page were this issue is discussed but this user is not only asks sources ."Yhuw" has removed all concensus translations from this page that were there several years befor his last apperaence on WP.

To be continued here or on Admin page Неполканов (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You and I have different approaches, (for example I respect RS like Dunlop while you respect your own ideas more) but just FYI I have never violated the 3RR. I want to understand better what it is you would prefer. YuHuw (talk) 11:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's count how many time you have removed the consensus map on Karaite page

21:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов (talk • contribs)

5)

6)

and how "Yhuw" explains his edits? "Revert User:Ancientsteppe puppet POV pushing".Some problems with logic,User:Ancientsteppe was not blocked for this map.

So assigning this consensus over all other languages version to his POV cannot be a good reason for its removal while its ignors the opinion of least 4 other editors and looks autistic and ridiculous. I wonder why admins do not stop this obvious vandalizm Неполканов (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue as promised:Here he claims that his edit is grammar improvemnt actually he totaly reverted my previous edit that removing RS fakes claims that Kazas consider to Karaims Subotnik origin and Firkovich related them to Kara(??!!!) Kazar,,I cited original cites what they really said(actually opposite!) but it was totally ignored.Probably because Israelite does not understand Hebrew 20:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов (talk • contribs)

Continuing:

1)Here and 2)here and 3)here and here again, again aand again "Yhuw" explains his ridiculous, meaningless redirection of Turkic Karaites page to Iranian village Qarailar argumenting it by one and only one meaningless explanation as above "User:Ancientsteppe puppet POV pushing". Nothing else. Неполканов (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look, sorry to say your English is pretty rough. Some people don't even think you should be allowed to edit wiki articles at all [6]. YuHuw (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was said when YuHuw still was not on WP.You are pretty good familiar with the things that was said about me during the Kaz's edits, are you ?Неполканов (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to revise the meaning of the word consensus and the WP:3RR. YuHuw (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is very easy to discover when searching that wall for comments about Nepolkanov. But yes when accused of being someone else I think it is a very normal reaction to want to find out who it is I am being accuse of being and why. YuHuw (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaz. Thank you. Toddy1 (talk) 01:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

memoirs

I saw you kept removing propaganda from that page. It was ottoman state policy to spread anti wahhabi views because they were about to go to war with them. see Ottoman-Saudi War. Nasluds (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

8 March 2016

Were these two edits by an IP editor, by you not logged in?

-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I want to see from you is impartial discussion of the sources I ask you to engage in discussion of on the talk pages of relevant topics rather than resorting to pulling my personal identity into question again and again. Please never post anything to me here or anywhere else ever again. I do not own a private jet. I urge you and your group of close wiki friends to stop and clean up your ubiquitous Harassment of me with an apology once and for all. Understand clearly that if you and your group of friends post anything about me anywhere again here on wikipedia that it is taken by me to be a breach of WP:HARASS. See WP:DENY for my future responses to you if you do not stop -I feel very sorry for people like you. YuHuw (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Karaimism. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing to good RS

I intend one on Qaraimits page. As you see there is no christaian prays there there. 1870 is not 1936,when Crimean Karaites in Lithuania added one of them to their siddur. As you see Караимиты is not what you supposed they are They are not Molokans at all. So I removed the irelevant stat from their page. You invited to learn the issue again and to edit properly the Subbotniks page. Hopefully without distorting and faking of original RS. Неполканов (talk) 17:16, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

You are welcome, it was clear to me that you were extremely confused about the subject. But your insults here about faking and distorting make you extremely unwelcome. Don't write here again unless it is an apology. See WP:HARASS. YuHuw (talk) 21:08, March 18, 2016 (UTC)

Accusations

Hello, YuHuw,
Regarding your comment here, if you choose, for some reason, to edit logged out of your Wikipedia user account, you can't take it personally if you are misidentified as another account or a sock. How is an editor/admin supposed to tie your YuHuw account to a random IP? Also, by editing logged out, you strengthen the accusations of other editors that you are a sockpuppet as it is typical sock behavior to edit both as a user and as an IP in order to look like several different editors have similar points of view. It is unwise for you to do so as you are already part of a sock investigation and I'd recommend you only edit when you can log into your primary account.
Also, repeated declarations of "I am not a sock" have no influence over those who believe you are one. Whether you are or not will be determined through the SPI which is where you should post any rebuttal you have. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do we share in common?

Dear User:Paul Benjamin Austin, User:Tradedia, and User:Valereee, We all suffered the same offensive abuse recently by the same user. I wonder if there is anything we might share in common which might have triggered this attack? For example do any of the confirmed sockpuppets of User:Ancientsteppe or User:I B Wright look familiar to you? Hoping you are all well. YuHuw (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion ---> to rephrase your question so as not intimate any WP:FORUMSHOP whilst maintaining WP:AGF at all times. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe what we all share in common is that we'd posted very recently or been mentioned on ANI. valereee (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=YuHuw&users=Tradedia&users=Paul+Benjamin+Austin&startdate=&enddate=&ns= That doesn't include me, because I can only enter three usernames, but I've posted to ANI too. valereee (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. to @Tradedia:, and @Valereee: - this person calling us Jimmy Savile should be actionable, shouldn't it? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Valereee is correct in that what links us is ANI. Also, I do not recognize any of the sockpuppets (and I have never been accused of being a sockpuppet). I was disappointed that the offensive message was deleted before I could read it. So thanks to Paul Benjamin Austin for giving me a clue. I am not sure what you mean by "actionable" as the user has already been indefinitely blocked. Tradedia^talk 06:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So basically someone created a puppet just to throw an insult, clearly some hot head who watches the Admin notice board and got prejudiced ideas about us. Might be time to take a wiki-break, I think. Perhaps that watcher will be stripped of his rights and blocked soon and that will be the end of that. All the best. YuHuw (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is indistinguishable from completely random. You will not have been attacked for any reason other than having made a recent edit, and probably won't be again. It isn't anything personal. The user has a long history of attacking random people, and being indefinitely blocked for it. The vandal in question is FiveSidedFistagon. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qaraimits

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qaraimits-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gypsies of Bulgaria

Hello, I noticed that you are interested on the subject that is why I am typing this message. By any chance do you have a possibility of find more source about this reality, that there are too many Gypsies identify themselves as ethnical Turkish: also on the census. I have found this article (bulgarian) Thanks for your contributions in advance Manaviko (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry User:Manaviko I have absolutely no idea about Gypsies in Bulgaria or anywhere else. I don't think Google translate did justice to the article. May I ask where you got the idea that I might have any interest in the subject? YuHuw (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC) My interests are more in the direction of ancient Persia usually. I do however know quite a lot about Turkic nations so maybe I will be able to contribute in some positive way? YuHuw (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, because I misunderstood. Yes, in case you can reach the state sources, it could be better to inform readers about Qarays who are presented as Qaray Turks on wiki-tr. Manaviko (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Keraites while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been forced to edit using only my IP because I have been constantly harassed by a small group of meatpuppets whenever I use my username. My IP address is randomly assigned by my IP service provider I have no control over which IP address they assign me nor when they might change it. But I only ever use the sole IP that I am assigned whether I edit logged in or not. I was told it is no crime to do so and if I choose to i can edit logged out on my IP instead of logged in if I have good reasons for it. Considering the incessant attempts to harass me by those meatpuppets trying to say I am UK based, I have a very good reason to edit logged out using only my current IP. YuHuw (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...did it take you a month to return to the UK?!

_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not perceive your recent comment as trying to help in any way at all. I perceive your comment as just trying to mock. I am sorry you have nothing better to do with your life on wikipedia other than pick on people who are doing their best to learn the ropes as quickly as possible. I bet you learned the ropes here much more slowly than I have so far. Don't post again here please unless you wish to apologize. 87.69.184.128 (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think an IP can ban me from an editor's Talk Page, that's one thing I learned. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking again, please stop! YuHuw (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article about Kazas

Thank you for your contribution. Please change the original Hebrew names of Kazas's books to Hebrew transcription,while you israeli it is easy enough for you.

Неполканов (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I said stop harassing me here [7], this is your second warning here. YuHuw (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this will help....

I was sorry to read about the difficulties you have been having. If you need some information removed, you should contact Oversight, which is the fastest way. Go to WP:RFO. Read the very first line, which says "For the fastest way to request oversight, click here." and then click on the underlined words (Click here). There are also some other ways to do this, listed further down on the page. I hope this helps! Sincerely, --Tribe of Tiger (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I make mistakes

If at some future date I make a mistake, and say that an IP editor is you, when the editor was not you, please could post a message on my talk page telling me in simple words that the IP was not you. Similarly, if I say that an IP was someone else, when it was really you, then please do the same. I hope this situation will not arise.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, YuHuw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Subbotniks#Karaimites

Hi, it has been suggested to call people involved in the Karaimit-Subbotniks subject to review the use of the word Karaimits which I see you were involved in here [8]. I have found that you were the author of the merged article. A couple of us are concerned that the subject of Crimean Karaites and of Karaimite Subbotniks should not be confused. Could you take a look please? 188.29.16Etc.BlahBlahBlah (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, YuHuw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]