User talk:Qcne
|
Hello! Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a new message, and remember to sign your post using ~~~~. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
 | It is approximately 8:10 PM in this user's locale. ( to update.) |
In this AFC outtake's page history, three oldIDs are scratched out entirely, as well as two summaries. Was it a case of PII? (Typing from my device.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Slgrandson Yup, I asked for revdel. Qcne (talk) 06:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
yo can you cheak this and approve it ~~ Sarim Wani
[edit]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jammu_and_Kashmir_Awami_Ittehad_Party Sarim Wani (talk) 11:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Please re-publish my page
[edit]I dont know why this page was denied. I know spelunky is a niche game but Lev Bryans is the #1 player in the world. 38.101.132.34 (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- We don't host random articles for every person in the world. Qcne (talk) 15:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Sister Elaine submission
[edit]Thank you for reviewing my work and offering feedback. This is my first post and I am still trying to understand it all. If yourself or other editors are able to provide more hands on assistance, please direct my path. In the review you mentioned using credible media sources. I put a variety of newspaper and magazine articles as sources, is there a general rule around how many are needed or what the ratio should be? Socksoup (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Socksoup. My biggest issue with the draft is it is written in a slightly promotional tone. Phrases like:
- - who dedicated her life
- - Her academic journey continued
- - driven by a deep desire
- - dedicated to bringing yoga and meditation to inmates
- These are all phrases that are written in a non-neutral way: when writing for Wikipedia you must write neutrally in the Wikipedia voice; the only time non-neutral language can be used is if you're directly quoting from a reliable source (and if you are quoting, you need to show you are quoting.) Qcne (talk) 09:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
sandbox review
[edit]Hello! Just wondering how I can share what I created in my sandbox for you to review...? Thank you again for your help! Staceyrich (talk) 19:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hia @Staceyrich - I am not seeing in your contribution history any sandboxes. Are you using a different account or are you logged out? If you haven't made the Sandbox yet, you can just share the URL with me directly once you have made a Sandbox. Qcne (talk) 09:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
The intent of this article is to give basic information about MAAsterG. There are a number of media articles, those published by the institutions visited by him, the URLs of which have been provided in this page. Can you guide me on where I am going wrong in drafting the language. The intent of this page is not to advertise or market MAAsterG, but make some basic information about him available to internet users. Thanks in advance for your help. ARGHJ (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ARGHJ your draft is written in a promotional way, and the majority of the draft does not have any in-line citations. Please re-write to be neutral and provide in-line citations throughout to reliable, independent sources. Qcne (talk) 09:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick response, Qcne. What does in-line citations mean? Does it mean that every sentence quoted on this page needs to have a cross reference of an independent source? ARGHJ (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, @ARGHJ. For biographies it is mandatory that every statement must be backed up with a reliable published source. If the source does not exist then the information should be removed. The in-line citations are those little numbers in brackets, of which you have 9 of, but they are clustered at the end of two sentences. Qcne (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Qcne I have submitted an edit and adopted a formal tone for the draft, while writing the biography in a neutral tone as suggested by you. In-line citations referencing a newspaper link or external website link or YouTube link (for interviews) have been given for every reference to a statement. Additional citations have also been included totalling 20. Request you to review and let me know in case of any further issues in the edited page. Thanks again for your help ARGHJ (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, @ARGHJ. For biographies it is mandatory that every statement must be backed up with a reliable published source. If the source does not exist then the information should be removed. The in-line citations are those little numbers in brackets, of which you have 9 of, but they are clustered at the end of two sentences. Qcne (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick response, Qcne. What does in-line citations mean? Does it mean that every sentence quoted on this page needs to have a cross reference of an independent source? ARGHJ (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Selena Slamour
[edit]Hey there,
I submitted a draft for review which got declined, with the message that the "submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)". The article showcases an interview from September 20, 2024 which aired live on the Kurdish Media Network Rudaw on national television. The link to the program's episode can be found on Rudaw's website https://www.rudaw.net/english/onair/tv/episodes/episode/diaspora---178/21092024115321 . I would like to know if there is a possibility for it to be published since it is a reliable source? Thank you. Letsrockthisthing123. (talk) 12:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Letsrockthisthing123.. The key thing is that the sources must be independent - an interview is not independent as it is the subject talking about themselves.
- We're looking for at least three independent reliable sources that provide significant in-depth coverage, that are not based on interviews, PR statements, from the subject's own website, etc. Qcne (talk) 12:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
My submission (Jim Rumph)
[edit]Hi there. You were helping me back in August, and then I think you went on vacation. Are you still able to help me? It was for my submission for Jim Rumph.
Thanks. Tallstop99 (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Tallstop99, sure thing- what further help would you like? Qcne (talk) 14:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I answered your questions here User talk:Qcne/Archives/2024/August in the "Review my submission please" and was wondering if you needed anything else from me. Tallstop99 (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry, I did indeed miss that notification. I think those sources would just about put us over the edge for notability. However- the draft will need a re-write before acceptance. If you let me know once you've re-written I can take another look. Qcne (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. I'll get it rewritten per your suggestion. Tallstop99 (talk) 13:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry, I did indeed miss that notification. I think those sources would just about put us over the edge for notability. However- the draft will need a re-write before acceptance. If you let me know once you've re-written I can take another look. Qcne (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I answered your questions here User talk:Qcne/Archives/2024/August in the "Review my submission please" and was wondering if you needed anything else from me. Tallstop99 (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Draft: Sarah Hester Ross
[edit]Hello! I have made the modifications we discussed on my draft: Draft:Sarah Hester Ross
I hope to improve even more - I'm trying to pin down the article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal where Sarah was named "Best Comedian."
Let me know if there is anything else you think I should do to improve the draft. Thank you so much.
Tamariskie Tamariskie (talk) 20:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hia @Tamariskie. I think this is borderline acceptable now - so will accept. It might face a deletion discussion by other members of Wikipedia - you'll be free to argue your case if that happens. Qcne (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Tamariskie (talk) 11:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Draft: Ajob Karkhana
[edit]Hello sir/mem, this user Wikisandboxe submitted for AFC the page Draft:Ajob Karkhana before I fully prepared this draft page!! And you were declined it!! But now the page is completely ready. Now I think you should review this page. Mr Bangladesh71 (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Digital health interventions has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital health interventions has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Draft:Giovanni di Gherardo da Prato
[edit]I translated it from the main Italian article which didn't contained any sources (I also saw a Turkish article for the same person which was also created from the main Italian article in June 2024). I mean the draft I am creating is not a total copy-paste of translation but I edited it all around. Shashvat Verma (talk) 13:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Shashvat Verma ah okay, well we certainly need sources so I suggest you do some research into the figure - check your local library for books, journals, articles, etc. Qcne (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I found a source online on Oxford Reference but I don't have a subscription :(
- Maybe you know someone who has it... Shashvat Verma (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Oxford Reference is available via Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, though I do not believe your account has enough edits to gain access. Check out the Resource Exchange on that same link. Qcne (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Speaking community to trans atlantic african slaves traded ratio
[edit]Dear Qcne, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide me with some feedback on why my article did not meet the acceptance criteria. I would be grateful for any guidance you can offer to help me improve it. Thank you for your time and dedication. 194.38.172.194 (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.