User talk:PARAKANYAA

About the Draft:The_Zhao_Fuqiang_Case

Hello, PARAKANYAA.Sorry to hear that you have rejected my off-draft apply of Draft:The_Zhao_Fuqiang_Case, I hope you can give specific suggestions for improvement. Besides, you mentioned that there are problems with this article in neutrality perspective. I am confused and hope you can explain it because it is translated from a Chinese version.Hzt0208042508415531 tw (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@Hzt0208042508415531 tw Hi! I will discuss this with you on the draft's talk page, so others can see it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi PARAKANYAA, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death

The article The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death for comments about the article, and Talk:The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nya Doxa

Hey, I've added some sources, if you want to take a new look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nya Doxa. In this case, I think it was very difficult to find anything from home without access to a Swedish newspaper archive (a paid service), but I found some long articles about the publishing house from the late 1990s and early 2000s. /Julle (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

@Julle Thank you very much for finding sources :) Yeah, I did try, but I had no luck. I withdrew. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thank you for the comments on the List of generation IX Pokémon nomination! I know I sent it to the wrong place by accident, but I greatly appreciate the comments and insight all the same. :) Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

@Pokelego999 You're welcome! Good luck with the FLC! PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faultlines (Megalogenis book)

Hello, PARAKANYAA,

You can't withdraw and close an AFD if there are any Delete votes cast which there were in this AFD. Please revert your closure and re-tag the article. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

@Liz My interpretation was that due to the fact that the only vote was based on my nomination's assertion of there being no sources it did not otherwise count, but I guess that is wrong, so okay, I have done so. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for doing so. While it might seem like I'm scolding you, I'm actually trying to save you from a trip to Deletion Review in case your closure was contested. Believe me, having your actions scrutinized at DRV can be a brutal experience, as bad as ANI. It might seem bureaucratic but it's best to abide by the rules even if it means that the AFD is open a few extra days. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi PARAKANYAA, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to NPP!

I see you've been granted NPP! Welcome! I hope you enjoy it! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. You can also join our Discord. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Thank you! Hah, it's temporary but hopefully I do an ok job so I can reapply when it runs out. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

With your experience with AFD, I'm guessing you'll do great. :) Feel free to add your name to the September backlog drive to get some extra barn stars, too. ;p Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Joshua Laurent Zarka

Was going to create a page for Joshua Zarka but then saw a rejected draft already existed. You were the last editor to reject it so just letting you know that I added about 15 references to it and resubmitted it. MaskedSinger (talk) 12:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@MaskedSinger Well, that's better, but my biggest issues are 1) the quality of those sources and 2) the formatting (though that isn't a decline reason). I will let someone else review it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Truth be told, I didn't create the draft so didn't touch the copy apart from adding that he's the current ambassador. My focus was on adding references but I can definitely look at that. MaskedSinger (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, it was declined not rejected. Rejected means no more submitting. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

ok thanks. I am sometimes oblivious to the finer nuances of Wikipedia and the various terminology. MaskedSinger (talk) 12:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Sea of Dreams

Good day! I've just received the message that you added a notability tag to three of my articles. I fully understand it for "Transition Dreams" and "Induction", but really need an explanation for "Sea of Dreams". The article lists four publications, an upcoming TV adaption and two reviews from independent sources. With the latter it fulfills the first criterion listed at the necessary notatbility criteria for books. I'd also argue that the fifth criterion is fulfilled, given how famous Liu Cixin is in- and outside of China with interest in his work currently increasing following the release of 3 Body Problem by Netflix in March 2024.

I really don't understand what you think is missing to establish notability? Samuel Adrian Antz (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Samuel Adrian Antz My issue with the Sea of Dreams page is that the sources showed clear notability for the collection it was reviewing, which Sea of Dreams was a part of. The reviews are for the collection, not this story, but I am unsure if their coverage of this story specifically is long enough to count as sigcov, or if it would be inherited down from that anyway - which would be less of a concern if the amount of the sources focusing on this story specifically were longer. Are there non-primary sources about the adaptions? PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@PARAKANYAA Thanks for the quick answer! I can definitely go on a search for such sources. So far almost all sources I've added for (english and german) articles about short stories came from reviews about the whole collection in which they have appeared in. I've never been told that this was a problem and hence have continued to do it like that. I'm currently finishing articles for all ten short stories by Liu Cixin published in his collection The Wandering Earth and all reviews I've added so far concern the whole collection. I was about to publish the first ones (those with three reviews and one with two longer reviews), but am now doubtful. Should I continue or first search for other sources? Samuel Adrian Antz (talk) 21:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Samuel Adrian Antz I'm not 100% clear on how it works with short stories, in all honesty. NBOOK does not specify how they are treated, if there is clear guidance somewhere I have not found it. My rationale was something along the lines of the fact that notability is not inherited. However, I think a bigger issue here is the length of content in the reviews of the collections, from my look all the ones in that article are fairly short when it comes to content on Sea of Dreams and not the collection as a whole; if the review contains significant amounts of content on the story itself then it may be warranted. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Samuel Adrian Antz Also, the fifth criterion is IMO an extremely high bar that is frequently misused, it is only for people so famous that their entire body of works is the subject of significant study, like Philip K. Dick or Tolkien or something. The author may be getting there but from my look he isn't there yet; wouldn't be surprised if he does eventually though PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)