User talk:Morhveem

October 2007

Flags in Infoboxes

Please do not place flags in infoboxes as you did in Thierry Henry. Please see Flags. If you want to discuss the issue, please write your comments in WP Project Football. Thank you and happy wiking! Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 10:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Håvard Nordtveit

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Arsenal F.C.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is no evidence Nordtveit has been recalled on loan so please stop editing the article to indicate otherwise. Qwghlm (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't mean to be harsh at all, it's just that here we have to have information from reliable sources. With all due respect to the Young Guns blog, his site is just a blog and has no official sources. If there is official confirmation on an official source - such as Arsenal or Salamanca's own official websites or a recognised reliable news site like the BBC, then that's fine to change here so go ahead - but please supply a link to the relevant story. Thanks! Qwghlm (talk) 00:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UD Salamanca confirms his departure at http://www.udsalamanca.net/cmsa/index.php. Morhveem (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2008 (GMT+1)

Or at least they confirm Arsenal wants him back. Morhveem (talk) 01:52, 31 October 2008 (GMT+1)

OK if it's been confirmed on Salamanca's website feel free to revert my edits - glad to be proven wrong on this occasion. Qwghlm (talk) 10:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Håvard Nordtveit

Havard Nordtveit has played 13 leagues for Lillestrom not 15 matches so unless you can find evidence to the contrary dont change my Havard Nordtveit edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supergunner08 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong.
http://www.altomfotball.no/element.do?matchId=&tournamentId=1&seasonId=331&timeFrom=&timeTo=&cmd=player&personId=137704&teamId=308
http://www.nifs.no/personprofil.php?person_id=19752
morhveem (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that website seems accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supergunner08 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lutz Pfannenstiel edits

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your updates to the Lutz Pfannenstiel page! I just wanted to point out that in this set of edits you seem to have added a series of external links to the very top of the article. Furthermore, one of them (the link to lutz-pfannenstiel.de) is already given in the article's "External links" section, and one of them (to "ebuddy.com") does not appear to have any relevance to the article. I've corrected this; if you have any questions or requests then please let me know. Once again, thanks for contributing! Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be more careful

Hi! When reverting, please don't fully revert an edit that contained some good material. This time, you reverted by addition of a link to the police college as well as two good categories to Jo Tessem's article. Geschichte (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi! When someone requests a link to back up a piece of information, it's not good enough to place it in the edit summary. It has to go in the article. Think about the readers. Geschichte (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lutz Pfannenstiel

Hello Morhveem, I appreciate your interest in Lutz Pfannenstiel... I'd funnily enough never even heard of him a week ago. When I looked at the article, it was in a really messy state. The statistics, as you can see, are a bit problematic, having played for so many clubs. Anyway, you reverted my edit, that's fine – I was just wondering how much you actually know about his league games for each club. I can't find any sources for him having played in Belgium or Malta apart from some news wires which appear to take his statistics from Wikipedia itself. I trust that a number of statistics from Lutz's own website are correct, in as far as the clubs are concerned, even if his appearances there include cup games. I'm yet to have read his book, but was wondering if you could find any info on his alleged appearances for his time at K. Sint-Truidense V.V. and Ħamrun Spartans F.C.? Or shall I combine both of our edits together, using your current appearance numbers for those clubs mentioned on his website/elsewhere? Your input is appreciated. Jared Preston (talk) 07:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Pacquette

Hi, I saw this recent edit and am curious; why? Seems redundant when he hasn't played since the last update. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bradley Bubb, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 13:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, thanks for updating players' statistics in their biographies. But could you please make sure you cite the sources you're using? At Carl Pentney, I don't think there's a reference included to support his Maidenhead stats. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Bubb

In this case I'd go with the club's official site, but please ensure you add it as a reference. Giant Snowman 17:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox formatting

Please see the proper layout at {{Infobox football biography}} - just because others are incorrect is irrelevant! Giant Snowman 10:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no restrictions in the infobox guidelines that limits the use of multiple parameters on the same line. In fact the general design considerations for infoboxes recommends that layout and ease-of-use should be regarded, hence so many editors choose to tighten the structure of overly long football players career statistics. In what scale do you intend to make this kind of reversals? Morhveem (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is nothing but personal preference (from editors like yourself) who make these changes - why? Not based in policy or consensus, and like I said against the standard format. Giant Snowman 09:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why are you repeatedly making these changed against the standard layout format and with no support in community consensus or policy? Giant Snowman 11:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhema Obed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superliga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ken Dugdale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Oxlade-Chamberlain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Morhveem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Femi Orenuga page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sergio Carrallo

The article Sergio Carrallo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Morhveem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bertie Brayley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 03:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Moses Ashikodi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Luís Pimenta

Following your page move, please can you fix all broken incoming links? Giant Snowman 14:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Benjamin

Hi, could you add your source for this edit please? Thanks, Nzd (talk) 21:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about this? The source cleary shows him in the squad for Great Wakering Rovers. I've amended it accordingly, but if there are any sources that show otherwise, feel free to add them. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Morhveem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Hogan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Hogan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Hogan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]