User talk:Macae

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Macae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Blueag9 (Talk | contribs) 16:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi Macae, thanks very much for uploading those pictures of the 2006 football game. They are awesome. Now we have to make sure they conform to Wikipedia policy so the image-deletionists do not delete them. I added the {{fairusein}} template to both pictures, which is required by Wikipedia image-use policy. Another requirement is that we must provide the source. Can you please add that information to the image pages?

What do you think about adding one more photo to show the hit by Kellen Heard?

Also, there is some discussion at Talk:Texas_A&M_University#Portal about an A&M portatl or Wikiproject. Is that something you might want to participate in? Johntex\^talk 18:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding to those image files. However, I think what is actually required is more like a web-link where you found the images or a contact person who sent you the images. Thanks, Johntex\^talk 20:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

If you will add an e-mail address to your profile, I would like to send you a message, please. Johntex\^talk 21:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to FTAB

If you have a source for your claim, please add it. — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for your improvements to 2007 Texas Longhorn football team. Would you be interested in working together on an article for the Aggie football season? I am interested in starting one but I hesitate because I don't think I have the band-width to keep it up-to-date all season. Thanks again for the edits. Best, Johntex\^talk 05:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear! A&M is fortunate that the school has several really good, really active editors on Wikipedia now, although I think BQ and BlueAg are both going on Wikibreak. Regardless, I think if you can help a little and I can help a little, that we can count on some help from others as we go forward.

I am familiar with the season template so I will take a stab at creating the article. I suspect you follow A&M's games a little more closely than I do, so your help with keeping up to date on scores, injuries and the like. Since your time is limited you could even just point me to the reference and I could try to work it in.

Also, I don't spend much time on fan forums for any team. If you happen to be on a fan forum and notice any pictures we could use (with the photographers permission to GFDL of course) then that would be great.

As always, we're volunteers so no-one can get that upset with us if we don't do it perfectly right? We should just do our best. Johntex\^talk 14:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Texas A&M Aggies football team

Howdy, Macae. I started this article and would appreciate your contributions to it. It's still in major construction. Thanks! BlueAg09 (Talk) 07:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Aggie Bonfire edit

If you have a source for that info, it sure would be a great addition. BTW, were you in the FTAB? — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the 12th man

They were indeed nicknamed the "suicide squad". I'll find a reference before I re-add it though. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vlcsnap-44953-1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vlcsnap-44953-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A&Mvstu2006 108.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:A&Mvstu2006 108.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carl Pelini

The article Carl Pelini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

College football assistant coaches are normally not considered notable, and notability cannot be achieved because of his head coach and brother Bo Pelini.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul McDonald (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3 Revert Rule

Please be aware that you may be violating the "Three Revert Rule" WP:3RR at Carl Pelini. It is important that you discuss revisions with other users rather than continued reverting. Someone may view this as being disruptive and your accout could be blocked.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that reversions have been made but each occured after edits were made by anonymous posters without explanations or justifications being provided. Only the last edit made mention of any reason. Certainly, going forward, I am happy to discuss the issue and agree to a resolution! User:Macae 11:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PassinterferenceagainstSweed.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PassinterferenceagainstSweed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12th fans

Please see Talk:Seattle Seahawks re some of your most recent edits. [User:UW Dawgs|UW Dawgs]] (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not dispute the reason for the block. It is entirely valid and reasonable. Please take a look at the issue and I would welcome any suggestions or revisions that you might be willing to make that can lead to a consensus agreement on the content of this article. Macae (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CenturyLink Field‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CenturyLink Field‎. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Macae. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Macae. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Macae. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Arlington High School (Texas) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. The fact that the only place you'll find him on Wikipedia is on a list is indicative that he's not notable, not that he is. John from Idegon (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]