User talk:Lowfatsourcreme

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Lowfatsourcreme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 04:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there friend!

So I notice you don't have any userinfo. I mean, I know mine is lame, but it's annoying when people show up as red, at least IMO. UnDeadGoat 02:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although it's terribly terrible.--Lowfatsourcreme 02:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um.

Is annoyed by: people who rabidly spew opinions because they think it makes them informed and political is this to say you don't?

Dis! Burn! That was LOW . . . (P.S. Why you anonymous? You got somethin' to hide, yo?) -- UnDeadGoat 18:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't go "it's just to get oil" whenever someone says the words "iraq war"

AHHHHHHH now I see what you mean I have experienced one myself. May I repent for my sins?

Possible reasons if you ever get assassinated

You may have pissed someone off by using "whom" or, worse, telling someone that they aren't "formal enough" for you. UnDeadGoat 18:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The userbox is too extreme for my attitude. But "whom" is such a good word.

Finally! a Jewish wikipedian

thank god... (Elite compact 13:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Wow, is he the first you've seen? I'm impressed . . . UnDeadGoat 01:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All Wikipedians should be kind and courteous to eachother, UnDeadGoat. We're all friends. --Shawn 02:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Madison West High School

Hello fellow Wikipedian! Can you tell me why you think the information you keep reverting should be that way? If not, please refrain from reverting edits without providing a justification. Thank you! --Shawn 22:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Camino icon.png

Image:Camino icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:MayaCole.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MayaCole.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.zmetro.com/w/maya.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]