User talk:JzG/Archive 70
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JzG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 65 | ← | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | → | Archive 75 |
May I ask for your assistance
Hi,
Are you still interested in the idea of at least some non-admins being able to view deleted pages? I understand that the proposal was shot down previously by foundation counsel; however I believe I have at least two possible answers to their concerns.
One possibility is to make this prospective (apparently the antonynm of retrospective although I'm not so sure) - that is to say that only edits deleted after its implementation can be viewed. For revisions such as libelous edits or copyright violations and so on, there can be a hard delete, lying some way between this soft delete and oversight, which will function just like a present deletion. Admins could also have the power to toggle a deletion from hard to soft (or to undelete) - so selected deletions made before this feature is implemented could be made soft.
The second possibility is to introduce a procedure somewhat like RFA where users are given permission to view deleted edits by the community. As admin privileges are currently granted not just based on trust in general, but also on trust that the tools will be used appropriately, there is a much greater pool of users who would be eligible to be given this permission.
And of course, it is perfectly possible to use both of these systems at once.
I have cross posted this to a few users who were active in the discussion in 2008 - I don't feel this is a violation of CANVASS because I have not made the proposal myself - the reality is I need an experienced Wikipedia with some "street cred" to make it. I already attempted to steer a discussion of a similar proposal this way, but sadly that discussion is irretrievable (see here - or even better, don't!). Because I have posted this to a few users, I would be greatful if you would reply at User_talk:Egg Centric/Proposal and perhaps we can get a discussion going!
Thank you!
Egg Centric 22:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
P.S. - silly me, I forgot to link to the original discussion in 2008. Here it is: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Persistent_proposals/Straw_poll_for_view-deleted
Ben Breedlove
Apologies if I sound a little hasty in my edit summary, here, a little late for me here :) that's all. Anyway the external links provided are either related to his death - or his 3 YouTube accounts which relate to his Internet Personality status. Regards, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Looks to me like WP:LINKFARM and WP:LTA. Guy (Help!) 12:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- True! Sorry again. I swear I'm half asleep - they should have a curfew on Wikipedia - well at least for the editors who obviously don't work well when they're sleepy, being me, myself and I. Thank you, and sorry for the trouble, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- You're me, you are :o) Guy (Help!) 14:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)