User talk:Buistr

Welcome!

Hello, Buistr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Khoikhoi 18:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Uk27.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Uk27.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Buistr 08:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)==Foreign Legion== Nice addition with the uniforms, but a moved it from History to a own section Carl Logan 10:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More nice additions to the uniform section. but I am a bit worried its taking over the article. One more thing: Should there not be a special sub-section of the uníform section for the white kepi or kepi blanc. Carl Logan 19:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes perhaps I was piling on the detail too much. Will stop, at least until the article has grown around the uniform section. Thanks for creating this as a separate item.

Re a separate sub section for the kepi blanc. The difficulty here is that this particular icon of the Legion has been around since at least the Mexican Intervention. A subsection devoted to it would need to repeat developments appearing in the main section. Will give this a bit more thought. Regards. Buistr 05:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking of creating another sub-article like French Foreign Legion in popular culture about the culture of the legion, copying much from the site on the French Wikipedia. Maybe we can incorporate the importance of the kepi blanc there.

I am also trying to create articles about the regiments of the legion, you don't have any information about any difference in uniform between the regiments. Carl Logan 18:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A culture of the Foreign Legion sub-article sounds like a good idea. There was clearly something that elevated the Legion above what a pre-1914 observer unkindly described as "a second rate regiment of German infantry transplanted to Africa". Douglas Porch devotes a good deal of his book "The French Foreign Legion - A Complete History" to analysing what made the Legion different.

Re regimental differences within the Legion: there were suprisingly few of these at least as far as regulation wear and insignia went. The French Army has, at least since 1870, opted for standardisation within branches. Thus (for example) one cuirassier regiment in 1900 would appear like every other one except for the numbers on the collar patches. There was little of the British emphasis on regimental identity through varied facings and elaborate official badges. The Legion was the same - until 1914 the only distinction between the 1sr REI and the 2nd REI was the number 1 or 2 on the collars of tunics, vestes and greatcoats. Between the wars the newly raised 1st REC wore silver buttons and insignia (following French cavalry custom), instead of the bronze of the infanty units. The main regimental distinctions from 1916 to the present day are probably (i) the elaborate forragere lanyards worn in the colours of particular medals when a regiment as a whole has won a number of citations (for example green and red for the Croix de Guerre); and (ii) the originally unofficial regimental, battalion and company badges adopted from the 1930s on at the initiative and expense of the individual unit. In the Legion these badges share as common elements the traditional red and green colours and the grenade. Otherwise they differ greatly in design but usually have some stylised symbol of the unit's past e.g. a dragon for service in Indo-China or a horse-shoe for service as a mounted company in the Sahara. Buistr 08:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cavalry

You wrote very detailed on the "Polish cavalry charge against tanks". Can you refer with a footnote to your source? (this way nobody will start reediting because he knows better). Actually I also learned about the Polish charging tanks with lances back in school, the usual story about Polish military unfit for the 20th century. Greetings Wandalstouring 00:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. A footnote link has been added as advised. Buistr 01:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wild geese

Nice work on the Flight of the Wild Geese article. Keep it up. Jdorney 09:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. The subject is an interesting one. Hopefully the article can be expanded still furtherBuistr 17:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial troops

The two links in the tag should provide you with detailed info, my two quick comments: this article needs internal links and inline citations.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 22:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history

Hi Buistr. I've seen you editing a few military topics and i thought you'd be interested in joining our Military history project. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 16:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FayssalF - yes I would be interested in joining the Military History Project. regards Buistr 17:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I am glad you are interested. If you have any questions please feel free to approach me or anyone of our project coordinators. Regards. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 18:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 00:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Persian Immortals

That's rather odd. Granted the picture isn't 100% perfect but it gives a relatively good idea of how they looked. I used this this and this as my reference for the drawing. Feel free to add the image back if you still feel it is appropriate. However do not do so to a point that the anon draws you into a 3RR vio. A block log means more than a picture being displayed on that article. If it is once more removed, I suggest asking other editor's opinions whether to keep it or not on the talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yen Bai mutiny

Hi there Buistr. Do you have the full details of the your book please? year, author, publisher, Isbn? Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bearskins

Sorry. I thought you hade merely removed fact tags without changing anything else. You're right. My apologies. So much of that stuff goes on that I sometimes lose patience and don't review the history to figure out what really happened. Bob98133 (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC) PS - thanks for fixing! Bob98133 (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About your changes to Karl Josef von Bachmann

First off, do not think I think you are a newbie. I am here for four years and I don't know everything there is to know, so I'd thought you might appreciate if I pointed something out to you. I saw your changes to Karl Josef von Bachmann and noticed that you did not put <ref>-Tags correctly (which is kind of hard if one is not used to it). I tried to fix it, using the {{cite book}}-template but I do not have this book and cannot thus check the correct location of the claims. So I would like to ask you to edit the article and add the page number(s) where you read this to the template, changing the "pages=" value of the template (e.g. changing <ref>{{cite book |title=The French Revolution |author=[[M.J. Sydenham]] |pages=}}</ref> to <ref>{{cite book |title=The French Revolution |author=[[M.J. Sydenham]] |pages=50-51}}</ref>. Thanks in advance and keep up the work! Also, you might want to read the MoS about references at WP:REF or the shorter essay WP:REFB. Regards. So#Why ^{review me!} 07:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tonkinese Rifles

Thanks for providing the interesting information on the tirailleurs tonkinois after the Sino-French War. It's out of my own period, so I learned a lot from it.

Djwilms (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I've got time I'll go through the two volumes of Thomazi's Histoire militaire de l'Indochine, which covers every skirmish ever fought in Indochina up to the 1930s. I'm sure there will be some interesting stuff on the post-Sino-French War exploits of the tirailleurs tonkinois. I'll start with the events you mention and move on from there.

Djwilms (talk) 02:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rifles or Tirailleurs

Hi Djilms. Further to our earlier exchange, I notice that you and Carl Logan have discussed whether tirailleurs or rifles should be the default term for the varigated "native" infantry regiments of the defunct French Empire. I wonder if a final conclusion was reached on this - as you may have noticed I have more or less alternated between the two desigations in the additions I have made to your article. I have had a number of communications with Carl over the years regarding French military articles - and in particular those relating to the Armee d' Afrique.

The correct translation of tirailleurs is a difficult one - "Rifles" is undoubtedly the most popular one but I have also seen "Skirmishers", "Levies" and "Sharpshooters" used. Even "Light Infantry", although that clearly clashes with the misnamed "Joyeux" of the Infanterie Legere d' Afrique. My personal preference would be for "Tirailleurs" but I will be happy to go along with any decision that may already have been made. Regards Buistr (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think both of us have been busy on other things, and we haven't taken the debate any further. My preference remains for Tonkinese (Annamese, Senegalese, etc) Rifles, on the grounds of accessibility. I believe that 'Rifles' remains the instinctive 'default' formulation most English-speaking readers are going to type in if they're looking for information. I'm perfectly happy to gloss that, so that the article might be titled 'Tonkinese Rifles (tirailleurs tonkinois)'. But I think the use of the French word tirailleur is out of place in an article title in an English-language encyclopedia, many of whose readers do not know French. Although I can see very clearly where Carl is coming from in his arguments for tirailleur, it would not occur to me, even though I am familiar with the structure of the French colonial forces, to type in 'Senegalese tirailleurs' as my first search choice.

Djwilms (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

troll

AlasdairGreen27 is a notorious troll: read here but he is dangerous because in previous cases instigated some admins to ban various valid editors as suspected socks: it's is a battle against users who would like to stop his political agenda in meatpuppetry with his accomplice user:DIREKTOR; you can report both them in wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents—Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.95.195.151 (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for revert - Czapka

Hello, I am so sorry, I check everytime if it is a filename, but this time I did not see it. Possibly the long Filename has help me to be blind. --Diwas (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

King's Royal Rifle Corps

Hi there, it's great to see somebody taking the trouble to correct image captions in articles... could you also correct the captions on the images pages themselves. I've added your change to the caption for File:King's Royal Rifle Corps by Harry Payne.JPG on Commons. Regards, Rod Rcbutcher (talk) 09:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baloch Regiment

Hello Buistr. Thanks for appreciating my efforts. As you might have guessed, I am the Official Historian of the Baloch Regiment. I am grateful to you for creating the page. I understand your concern about 'Uniforms and Insignia.' The reason I broke up the section was that the present regiment is an amalgamation of three different regiments, whose uniforms underwent numerous changes over the years. Describing these changes at the appropriate place gives them the proper historical context, while putting them all in one section was confusing the subject. Regards, Beloochee (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Thank you for your contribution to The Women's March on Versailles! Your remarks about the palace guards add valuable information and were nicely integrated with the earlier text. Thank you also (very much!) for your kind words about the article as a whole. I see you are deeply interested in military history – would you consider having a look at the Battle of Valmy article? I rewrote it some time ago but remain unsatisfied with it; I keep meaning to get back to it but so far I haven't had the necessary inspiration. Perhaps you will–? SteveStrummer (talk) 00:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the latest addition to Battle of Valmy! I hope I'll see you around Wikitown more often :) SteveStrummer (talk) 22:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Borrowed your TOC illustration coding

I borrowed your TOC - illustration wiki syntax for the article U.S. Constitution. It has stood unchallenged for a week, although I am still holding my breath. As the Table of Contents got over two screens long, there was a gaping hole which I believe could turn prospective readers away. Following your example I believe leads the reader into the Table of Contents and towards the text when first opening the article page. Thanks. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The format looks good in this context and should readily achieve your purpose. Good luck with your improvements! Buistr (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Legion Page

You are right, I did get lazy and revert your entire edit as opposed to manually re-correcting each mistake. I was simply in a hurry and hope you understand. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 06:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Régiment de la Reine, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Marie-Thérèse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mehariste picture

Hello Buistr. Thanks for your message, but I don't understand what's wrong with the picture of the Compagnies sahariennes... Could you be more specific ? DITWIN GRIM (talk) 23:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I see the image without problem... Here are the links I used from Wikicommons:

;

. DITWIN GRIM (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sétif and Guelma

Hello, you can contribute to Talk:Sétif and Guelma massacre if you want. Maybe we can agree in a common point. --Dr.tolga (talk) 02:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Régiment de la Reine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marie-Thérèse of Spain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Something that you might like...

Hello Buistr ! As you seem to be interested in all sorts of military units, I thought you'd might be interested by this article which I recently created : Battalion of Light Infantry of Africa

Hello Buistr. I don't know anything about the Companies d'Exclus. I thought Bat' d'Af'/Biribi/French army's colonial bagnes/bataillons disciplinaires/etc. were different names for a single unit : the BILA. Or am I confusing different units? Were the Compagnies d'Exclus a subsection of the Bat' d'Af'/Biribi or is it a completely different unit ? I may have added informations which doesn't belong to Bat' d'Af' but to a similar unit... Feel free to complete the article or to correct my mistakes. I also think about nominating this article for DYK when we'll be sure there's nothing erroneous in it.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battalions of Light Infantry of Africa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bougie

Turcopole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Templers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Fort Saint-Jean (Marseille), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army of Africa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Austria-Hungary Shakos

Hi. Ref to shakos for Line Infantry in full dress is fine. Just wanted to avoid the impression that it was part of service dress. Regards, Hengistmate (talk) 10:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Perhaps I should make it clearer that the Belgian shako was service dress (as well as full dress). Regards, Hengistmate (talk) 12:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Swiss mercenaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterloo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Byzantine army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Immortals

Compagnie des Carabiniers du Prince (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spats

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi Buistr, I see at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/African_military_history_task_force that your interests might extend to the Free French Forces in North Africa during World War II. I've been trying to rescue Raphaël Onana, which is a translation from the French-language bio of the same NCO. One issue has been the assertion that he was awarded the Legion of Honour (I presume as a Chevalier) by de Gaulle, something that I would have thought would be easy to verify, but so far I've had no success finding an authoritative list. Sourcing of the article has been quite limited, relying mostly on his autobiography. I wonder if you might be willing to take a look at the article and see what you can do to help out. Thank you, LeadSongDog come howl! 15:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I mostly came at it from translation cleanup, but even the French-language wiki had sourcing issues. I was astonished that there's no real authoritative sourcing available online for a complete List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name, comparable to what is available for the List of Victoria Cross recipients. LeadSongDog come howl! 20:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for checking. Did you find anything about the units mentioned? LeadSongDog come howl! 13:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's helpful, anyhow. The article at fr:1er régiment de Tirailleurs du Cameroun would benefit from those sources you mention. That should be firmed up a bit before translation.LeadSongDog come howl! 13:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redcoat

It is best that such discussions are public so others can see the conversation and comment if they want to so please see Talk:Red coat (British army) -- PBS (talk) 08:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Irving and Casson; Austrian knot; Italian East African lira; Dominic Guard; Billund, Denmark; Guards Cavalry Division (German Empire); Berner Laufhund; Italian Somaliland lira; Manual of arms; Nokia 500; Hassi R'Mel integrated solar combined cycle power station; Aeschynomene; Light cavalry; Italian Somaliland somalo; Devil's Peak, Hong Kong; Șcheii Brașovului; Eritrean tallero; Moneghetti; Eldridge Park

Cleanup: Illegal immigration; Musketeer; History of the Royal Marines
Merge: Royal Regiment of Scotland; Royal Norfolk Regiment; French Cameroons
Add Sources: Corps of Drums; Military beret; Principality of Wy
Wikify: Middlesex Yeomanry; Antoine Charles Louis de Lasalle; 75th Ranger Regiment (United States)
Expand: 4th Hussar Regiment (France); Marquesas Islands; Prince Peter of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Takapuwahia; Shane Johnson (soccer); Invincible error; 61st Pioneers; Operation Midnight Climax; 64th Pioneers; Alias Records; Bikaner Camel Corps; Fred Bremner; Bombay Army; Push of pike; Mentor of Rhodes; Permanent employment; Second Battle of Champagne; 69th Punjabis; 4th Bombay Grenadiers; Vasily Orlov-Denisov; José Félix Estigarribia; The Ravi Lancers

Cleanup: Death rates in the 20th century; Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment); Gas duster
Merge: Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration; List of Allied forces in the Normandy Campaign; Noble Guard (Vatican)
Add Sources: Dragoon guards; Regiment; Indian Army
Wikify: Indian general election in Bihar, 1971; Canyon Sam; Maru Pradesh
Expand: Law enforcement in the United Kingdom; 1 Gorkha Rifles; The Rifles

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Siege of Cuartel de la Montaña (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Franco and Mola

Asturian miners' strike of 1934 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diego Hidalgo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Garde Civique

Dear Buistr, As you probably saw, much of my text was a translation of the French wiki article which, unfortunately, doesn't cite any sources. If you could find any refs to use for the text, that'd be great though if not, I think the anecdote you mentioned could safely be retained with the ^{[citation needed]} tag. Best regards Brigade Piron (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spahi photograph

Hello Eliedion. Thank you for adding the very interesting 1913 photograph of the Paris amusement park scene to the Spahi article. Unfortunately the figure shown is an Algerian tirailleur (infantryman), not a spahi (cavalryman) from Senegal. I have accordingly moved it to the article on tirailleurs. Thanks again. Buistr (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. The source indicated that it was a spahi soldier. Thanks. Eliedion

(d) 20:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are they spahi soldiers? Best regards. Eliedion

(d) 15:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another very good photo! Thanks for posting it. These are tirailleurs senegalais - that is to say infantrymen from what was then French West Africa. They were a separate corps from the spahis senegalais (cavalry) and wore dark blue uniforms instead of red. Detachments from these colonial regiments were brought to France in 1913 to participate in the annual Bastille Day parade. It was the first time that these soldiers had been seen in Paris and they attracted much attention. See the tirailleurs senegalais article for more pictures and background. Regards Buistr (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Askari

Hello! What's translate Wissmanntruppe? Senior Strateg (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. The terms translates as "Wissmann's troops" or "Wissmann Force". Hermann Wissmann was a German officer who organised a force of askaris to suppress a rising against the German East Africa Company in 1888-89. See Abushiri Revolt for details. Buistr (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Senior Strateg (talk) 09:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hachi editor issue

That one editor keeps adding the false material about "spirits reuniting" to the Hachi article. That is all the person has ever done according to their edit history. I've politely asked the person to stop before and a little less politely done so again. If this person does not stop, would you consider backing me up if I start a complaint? JayHubie (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this is deliberate vandalism but rather the actions of a dog-lover who is distressed at the thought of a notably faithful pooch dying alone in the snow. The original Japanese film does actually conclude with Hachi running through a luminescent wood to reunite with his owner. By contrast the Swedish/American remake settles for an ambiguous ending apparently intended neither to upset viewers who believe "dogs go to heaven" nor irritate those who consider that they die uncomprehendingly like any other animal. Emotive stuff. As far as the Wiki-article goes I think that a factual summary along the lines of "dog dreams of happy past; dog is shown asleep as train approaches; professor comes out of station; dog and professor embrace; dog is shown dead, camera swings into night sky" would be the best compromise. Sorry not to be more helpful. Buistr (talk) 08:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georges Picquart may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<ref>page 226, 'The Proud Tower", Barbara W. Tuchman, published 1966 by Hamish Hamilton Ltd London}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gendarmerie

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gendarmerie&oldid=564294043&diff=prev

by non-foreign, I meant not an occupying force, such as US forces in Iraq. Tango303 (talk) 22:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, but I suggest that the original wording in the article lede be retained. Unless otherwise specified it is reasonable to assume that any named police or gendarmerie force is an indigenous one. Regards Buistr (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal Army

Hi - Thanks for your recent edit to Bengal Army. Please can you add a source? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference added as requested. Regards Buistr (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rasputin

Hello Buistr, I like your changes in the article on Rasputin. May be you like to "collaborate" with me? I have a lot of details on Rasputin, studying his life for almost half a year. I would like to add my details, coming from Dutch experts on Rasputin, but I need some help from someone who is a native speaker, and most important, not too mystical. If you agree, I will supply you with details to improve the article. In my view it is important because the article is read each day by several hundreds of people and it will affect articles on Rasputin in other languages. Tell me if you like the idea. Regards from Amsterdam.07:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello Taksen. Yes I would be glad to copy-edit any material that you wish to add to the Rasputin article. I suggest that you place these additions on either your talk page or in a specially created sand box and let me have the link. Regards Buistr (talk) 07:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look here [1]. Your alias Buistr has a Dutch flavour. Where did you get it from? Taksen (talk) 11:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Taksen. I have copy-edited the draft article concentrating on spelling, grammar and English language style. I do not have any special access to reference material for this period so have only made minor changes to the actual content. Since you have clearly done a great deal of research please feel free to revert my edits. There are a couple of points where I have raised queries in bolded text. You have done a very good rework of the article - especially in view of the sometimes lurid nature of the topic and the often contradictory sources available. Best wishes Buistr (talk) 04:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Dutch colleagues have told me that "Buist" is a not uncommon name in Holland but it is also used in Scotland where my family came from - rather unglamorously a form of paint used to mark sheep!

Hello Buistr, thank you for taking a look at the text and the compliments. I seldon came across such a difficult subject, but I learned a lot about pre-revolutionary Russia and my view on history and historians changed. I still need to adjust my text with the latest "improvements" from the real article on Rasputin. I am not sure every change in the past three months can be taken as a serious improvement. [2] Which ones do you think are interesting and can be added without doubt?Taksen (talk) 10:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC) In the mean time I uploaded my version, the one you corrected and added some of the improvements. Now we can go on there (it really became to difficult to keep track of the changes on both versions). I suppose you will keep on eye on what happens in the next few days.Taksen (talk) 13:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Buistr, I prefer not to use my sandbox2 anymore. I agree with your changes. Could add your them to the real article? Rasputin was against this war. I did not explain it very well.Taksen (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Army

Thanks for your message Buistr. I looked at the material dealing with the creation of the new army in 1956 and compared it with the information I was translating from the French Wikipedia; they seemed to be virtually identical. Happy to have you restore the material, with citations, just don't remove material that is already there and valid. You may be interested to have a look at this week's Signpost, which drew my attention to Tunisia. Also, saw your complaint about the unreferenced list of equipment, which I think you said seemed like something that would not be released. Are you aware of the IISS Military Balance?- they yearly print all this stuff for all the armies of the world. Drop me an e-mail via the emailthisuser if you'd like to see an extract. Cheers and thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Cheers.Buistr (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like the same guy did Tunisian Land Army, because some of it is exactly the stuff I've translated into English at the other page. I've moved the TLA article to Tunisian Army, citing COMMONNAME and WP:UE. It will need to be throughly cleaned up and referenced. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last formed surviving troops

Thanks for your edit summary. Could you maybe rephrase the sentence though? To the uninformed reader (such as myself), it doesn't make sense. --Tóraí (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not necessary now - another editor has picked up duplicated references within the lead section to the last stand and has (correctly) removed the first passage. For the record though "formed" troops was a term meaning that they were in ranks or a square or (as in this case) a back to back group. Anything of at least a semi-organised nature, as opposed to a rabble of fleeing individuals. I presume this was the reason for including the word in the original text. Regards (Buistr (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Colonel general may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

a rank]] which translates as "colonel general". It is equal to the rank of 4-star ("full") general). Colonel general is however junior to the rank of field marshal and is an honory distinction

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zaptié, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC))[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Auxiliaries may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

units, broadly grouped as [[Ala]] (cavalry), [[Cohors]] (infantry) and [[Cohors equitata]] (infantry with a cavalry element}. Specialist units of slingers, scouts, archers and camel mounted detachments continued in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bicorne

My edit to the 'Bicorne' page (in the 'cocked hat') section does make sense, as you're aware of the ban of the word 'cock' as, yes, it is slang for penis. This is why 'ball cock' is replaced with 'ball valve', and 'cock', as in a male hen, is 'rooster'. This is similar to the ban of the name 'Dick', as you're aware that 'dick' is slang for penis, and consequently, the shortened form of 'Richard' is now 'Rick'. 21:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat

'Cock' has about 12 different meanings (check any dictionary). The reason for deleting your addition from this particular article was that there was no connection between the slang term noted above and a historic military hat. Sorry. Buistr (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cretan archers

Do you have a page number for that reference?[3] Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 07:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page 42 - as recorded in the reference given. Buistr (talk) 07:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, ack. My bad. Apologies! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Military band may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of the Argentine Ministry of Defense. The band wears uniforms worn by Argentine gunners during the [[Argentina-Brazil War] and later conflicts.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Lance ineffective in melee

Re: this edit, with the comment "Sourced reference for the ineffectiveness of lances in melees is given in the main text of the article", I am unable to locate the text or refs. Some main text seems to imply the opposite. Can you point the text out to me? --A D Monroe III (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See quote from Barbara Tuchman's "Guns of August" under "World War I section.Buistr (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that has nothing to do with the lance in melee; melee was virtually absent from WWI. Any other refs? --A D Monroe III (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But the quote given by Tchman does refer to a close-quarters clash between a squadron of British cavalry armed with sabers and a squadron of German uhlans carrying lances, near Mons on 22nd August 1914. I would have thought this met the dictionary definition of melees as "a confused fight, skirmish, scuffle". The lance seems to have been an overrated weapon throughout the hundred years or so that it was in use by (comparatively) modern European armies, except against infantry caught in open order. If you are looking for instances of lancers breaking opposing cavalry in a great swirling encounter you may have to go back to Napoleonic battles. Buistr (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The lede text with the cn tag you removed was about the Medieval period; the quote you have isn't for that. Even if it was, it's about a single skirmish, so fails WP:UNDUE. Your "seems to have been" implies WP:SYNTH. If this is all you have, I'd restore the cn. --A D Monroe III (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding source references for the ineffectiveness of both medieval and early 20th century lances in a melee. If you wish to continue this discussion then please move to the talk page of the article so that other editors can provide input. Buistr (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Query

Re: [4]. How do you know they're marines? The picture title at the LOC uses "sailors." I'm not adverse to changing the characterization, but I'd like to know why you did so! Best, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The ed17. I think the hand written caption on the LOC photo got it wrong. Excusably enough. The Brazilian Navy's enlisted men c1913 wore the universal white or blue sailor suits of the era (see the photograph of mutineers in the same article). However the figures in the second photograph are wearing the same khaki drill without visible buttons, plus belts, as that worn by the Brazilian Army during 1910-20 for summer service uniforms. In addition the flat topped forage caps with side badges are the same as those worn in white by the modern Brazilian Marine Corps for gala dress. They also carry bayonets as side arms - not a usual part of a sailor's equipment. I guess this constitutes a degree of original research (historic military uniforms are my hobby) and you are welcome to revert. However the photo does seem well positioned in the article - next to a reference in the text describing a mutiny by Brazilian marines which followed on the Revolt of the Lash. Regards Buistr (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Buistr, I apologize for not checking back to see if you replied. I don't mind a bit of OR in picture captions if there's evidence to back it up; I'm not wedded to reporting incorrect information. ;-) Thank you for the explanation! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 03:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humayun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Military uniform page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cavalry page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fez may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|porter]]s and [[bellhop]]s sometimes still wear a fez to provide local colour for visitors,}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Swiss Guard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Hundred Guard (''Cent Suisses''), which served at the French court from 1490 to 1817). This small force was complemented in 1567 by a Swiss Guards regiment. In the 18th and early 19th

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC) |}[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Buistr!

Happy New Year!

Buistr,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Re:

Yep, all those edits came from a long-term abuser who mixes up copyvios and false informations pursuing a strictly non neutral agenda. Ciao! --Vituzzu (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glenrowan

I don't think it's all that puzzling for police to be in civilian clothing, and it's slightly distracting to draw attention a relatively minor detail like that in the aftermath of the Glenrowan shootout. The point of interest is them posing in front of the tree where Kelly was captured, not what they're wearing. Their clothing isn't discernible at thumbnail size. I suppose it's a detail worth mentioning in the image description over at Wiki Commons? - HappyWaldo (talk) 01:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toga

Hi Buistr. I reverted both your edits at Toga for the following reasons. Both the passages you edited were tagged for citation, which invites citation by reliable sources, or else removal, rather than further uncited editing. The image of Vel Saties is of a cloaked Etruscan, according to Mary Beard; not of a togate Etruscan; she's very specific about that. I happen to agree with you about the North African claims; but unless a cite can be found for either the claim or counterclaim, the sentence should probably be removed. Sorry 'bout that. Best, Haploidavey (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Failing a reliable modern opinion on the matter, it might be useful to cite Roman belief on toga origins (Pliny, IIRC), via William Smith - old but reasonably sound source. I'll remove the North African business entirely - it has remained uncited for quite some time. Haploidavey (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, Buistr. Yes, the North African claims are highly suspect. But it seems the Romans themselves thought the toga - specifically the praetexta version - derived from the Etruscans. If that's what they thought, that's what we can say. I mean, who's to argue? Btw, William Smith has heaps on the topic, which I'm distilling, very slowly. Horrible topic, to be honest. Haploidavey (talk) 21:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Expeditionary Force in France

The paragraph you asked to clarify was recently added by User:OJOM. He probably wanted to say that the corps trained in France but were also deployed elsewhere.

I suspect English isn't his strongest skill and also that he doesn't bother to integrate his edits with the rest of the text, not to mention sourcing. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Buistr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cossack Brigade

Hi Buistr,

First of all, a Merry Christmas to you! :-)

Regarding your edit on the Persian Cossack Brigade page. You're partially right in your assesment (absorption in Reza Shah's later rule) however, the name "Iranian Cossack Brigade" is definetely used in many of the WP:RS sources. After all, even though Iran was known as Persia to the outside world for millenia, the native name has always been "Iran". Here are a few of these sources in question;

Although according to Domantovich, the first commandant of the Iranian Cossack Brigade, this initiative came from the shah himself, Field-Marshal Ahmad (...) -- Cronin, Stephanie. (1997). "The Army and Creation of the Pahlavi State in Iran, 1921-1926". I.B.Tauris. ISBN 978-1860641053 p. 54

One of the principal components of Riza Khan's new army in the nineteen-twenties was the Iranian Cossack Brigade. -- (1998) "Iran: Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies". The Institute. (original from the University of Michigan). pp 178, 183.

(...)(later Riza Shah Pahlavi), and indeed within four years he rose from the rank of colonel in the Iranian Cossack Brigade to the Iranian throne. -- Shahvar, Soli. (2009). "Forgotten Schools: The Baha'Is and Modern Education in Iran, 1899-1934". I.B.Tauris. ISBN 978-0857712714 p. 5

Reza Khan, who had been a brigadier general in the Iranian Cossack Brigade before ousting Iran's last Qajar king in 1925. -- Wawro, Geoffrey. (2010). Penguin (chapter 10 - Reza Khan). ISBN 978-1101197684

military officers in European uniforms, clergymen, cadets of the military school, and one or two European women, Reza Khan Savadkuhi of the Iranian Cossack Brigade placed on (...) -- Buchan, James (2013). "Days of God: The Revolution in Iran and Its Consequences". Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1416597773 p 1

Hence, per the sources, I believe it should be included as an alternate name in the lede. All the best - LouisAragon (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings LouisAragon. You make a convincing case for including "Iranian Cossack Brigade" as an alternative name for the unit. I suggest that you go ahead with the addition. I would do so but I think that adding source references (one or two should be sufficient) would probably infringe some esoteric Wiki code of conduct if I had not sighted the books/publications myself. Best wishes for the New Year! Buistr (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strange why I missed your response.. Though its kind of belated, I wish you all the best for this New Year we're in as well obviously! :-) - LouisAragon (talk) 15:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to add 4 of the 5 sources linked above within one "major" ref tag for the time being, as the article lacks alot of inline refs. They'll suffice for now, but they should get removed whenever the article has received more inline references, as they won't be needed anymore at that point. All the best - LouisAragon (talk) 16:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for your contributions to the article Auxiliaries. Awarded by Cdjp1 on 16 August 2017.

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Buistr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mexican Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Zacatecas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swiss mercenaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belgian képis.

Hi. I've added to the discussion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kepi#Belgium. Hengistmate (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeomanry article

Hi. Thanks for your input on the Yeomanry->Yeomanry Cavalry page move request. It's clear that this was an inappropriate move and I've withdrawn the request. I do, however, believe that separate articles are justified and, following a discussion with one of the other contributors to the page move discussion, have begun a discussion about reverting the Yeomanry article to its original state, and splitting off the work I have done into a separate Yeomanry Cavalry article. I would welcome your opinion on this. Factotem (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julien-Désiré Schmaltz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bengal Native Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Buistr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Grey, 1st Viscount Grey of Fallodon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Itchen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racism in British India

Hi, the whole point of the statement that you objected to and tagged at Racism in British India was that it is indeed an example of racism. The statement is in the cited source, which is discussing such racism. That's why I reverted your tagging - I understand that you do not like it because it is racist but it was in fact sourced.

You may want to comment in the thread at Talk:Racism in British India concerning what next to do with the article, which was recently restored from a redirect. - Sitush (talk) 12:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss Guards in other European countries

Hi Buistr: your military Wikipedia-palmares is impressive and it was not my intention to interfere with your competence. Is it Newzealands geographical distance to Switzerland, that you are not aware of the fact, that the Duchy of Lorraine hired a Swiss Guard in 1581 (several times disbanded and newly founded) which followed Duke Franz Stephan 1737 in its ascend to the Grand Duchy of Tuscany to Florence and 1745 as Emperor of Habsburg-Lorraine to Vienna? May I give you some other hints? 1. The independent city state of Lucca in 1653 also employed a Swiss Guard. 2. Not only the Pope had its Swiss Guard, but several of its legates too. 2. The mentioned Swiss regiment in Portuguese service was not a Swiss Guard. Regards, Toni Moser (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Toni Moser. Thank you for this. I did not intend to delete your addition re the Duchy of Lorraine's Swiss Guard without explanation - but I was editing very late at night and I made a mistake. My apologies for this. There were simply a few minor spelling and grammar mistakes that I intended to correct. In addition, while I have an extensive library of military history books I was not able to trace a reference to a Swiss Guard in Lorraine. Are there any source references on this particular subject that can be added to the article? I propose to take the additional information that you have provided and restore the passage regarding Lorraine. You are welcome to correct any mistakes that I make. Regards Buistr (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Buistr, there are sources in German about the Guard and one in English, the family tree of Franz Stephan concerned:

1. Dukes of Lorraine family tree;

2.

(Odyssee of the Swiss Guard with its ship "virgin Maria" at its transfer from Lunéville to Florenz);

3. Theodor von Liebenau: Lothringen und die Schweiz, in: Katholische Schweizerblätter 1897, OCLC 717496373 (Lorraine and Switzerland);

4. Joseph Schürmann-Roth: Die Gardisten der Eidgenössischen Garde in Lothringen, Florenz und Wien im 17./18. Jahrhundert, Personenregister (bearbeitet), Staatsarchiv Luzern 1989. (Rooster of the Swiss Guard in Lorraine's Service, States Archive of the Canton Luzern);

5.Schweizer Truppen in lothringischen Diensten (gives you an overview of the Swiss Guards story in German).

Excuse my English please, Toni Moser (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Buistr, just in case you would like to complete your list of Swiss Guards.
The english version of the article would merit it to be complete! Regards, Toni Moser (talk) 04:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC):[reply]

#	Location	Name	Period	Source/Reference	Remarks
1	France	"Cent Suisses" Swiss Guards Regiment	1497–1792, 1814–1830 1616–1792/ 1815–1830	Paul de Vallière, Henry Guisan, Ulrich Wille: Treue und Ehre, Geschichte der Schweizer in fremden Diensten. (Übersetzt von Walter Sandoz). Les editions d’art ancien, Lausanne 1940. Albert Maag: Geschichte der Schweizertruppen in französischen Diensten. Verlag von Ernst Kuhn, Biel 1891. Abbé François Girard: Histoire Abrégée Des Officiers Suisses Qui Se Sont Distingués Aux Service Étranges Dans Des Grades Supérieurs. Tome II., Louis Piller Imprimeur, Fribourg en Suisse 1781. Louis Vuillemin: Geschichte der Eidgenossen während des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Aus dem Französischen, 2. Teil, Orell, Füssli und Compagnie, Zürich 1844.
2	Vatican	Papal Swiss Guard	1505–1527, 1548–1798, 1800–1848, 1852–today	Paul de Vallière, Henry Guisan, Ulrich Wille: Treue und Ehre, Geschichte der Schweizer in fremden Diensten. (Übersetzt von Walter Sandoz). Les editions d’art ancien, Lausanne 1940. Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927.	Still on duty today with permit of the Swiss Governement (proceedings session February 15, 1929; 297): Le nouveau statut du St. Siège: „… Il est difficile […] de considérer la garde papale comme une armée étrangère au sens de l’article 94 du code pénal militaire; cette troupe étant une simple garde de police, quiconque pourra y prendre du service, comme actuellement, sans l’autorisation du Conseil fédéral …“
3	Bologna	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	1542–1796	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927. Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Birgit Emich: Territoriale Integration in der Frühen Neuzeit, Ferrara und der Kirchenstaat, Böhlau Verlag, Köln Weimar Wien 2005.
4	Ravenna	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	1550–1796	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927. Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006.
5	Perugia	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	1550–1796	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927. Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Akte AKT13/1359, Staatsarchiv Luzern.
6	Avignon	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	1573–1790	Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Ulrich Nersinger: Die Päpstliche Schweizergarde in Avignon, kathnews-Redaktion, 2014. gelesen 3. Juli 2016, 20:0.
7	Ferrara	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	1598–1796	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927. Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Alois Müller: Zur Geschichte der päpstlichen Garde in Ferrara und ihr Verhältnis zu Zug, Zeitschrift für schweizerische Kirchengeschichte, Band 34, 1940.
8	Urbino (and Pesaro)	Legational Papal Swiss Guard	(1584)/1631–1796	Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Salvatore Caponetto: Pesaro e la legazione d’Urbino nella seconda metà del sec. XVIII, in Studia Oliveriana VII, Organ der oliverianischen Bibliothek und Museen, Pesaro 1959.
9	?	Legational Papal Life Guard "Chigi"	1666–?	Urban Fink, Hervé de Weck, Christian Schweizer: Hirtenstab und Hellebarde, Die päpstliche Schweizergarde in Rom 1506–2006; Schweizerische Vereinigung für Militärgeschichte und Militärwissenschaft, Organisationskomitee «500 Jahre Schweizergarde» und Eidgenössische Militärbibliothek, Theologischer Verlag, Zürich 2006. Alois Müller: Zur Geschichte der päpstlichen Garde in Ferrara und ihr Verhältnis zu Zug, Zeitschrift für schweizerische Kirchengeschichte, Band 34, 1940.
10	Netherlands	life guard "Guardes Zwiters"	1672–?	Robert Murray Bakker (Albach): Die Schweizer Regimenter in holländischen Diensten 1693-1797, Artikel in Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Familienforschung, 1989, S. 57–104, wiedergegeben in Texte zur Geschichte von Untervaz, Untervazer Burgenverein, Untervaz, 2012.
11	Genova	Swiss Guard	1609–1797	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band. Neuenburg 1927. Angelo Terenzoni: I Militari Svizzeri al servizio della Repubblica di Genova. Presentazione al convegno Le alabarda, La Repubblica di Genova, La Guardia Svizzera e non solo, Biblioteca Berio, Genova 2010.
12	Lorraine Tuscany Austria	Swiss Guard	1581–1638, 1641–1654, 1699–1767	Theodor von Liebenau: Lothringen und die Schweiz, in: Katholische Schweizerblätter 1897. Joseph Schürmann-Roth: Die Gardisten der Eidgenössischen Garde in Lothringen, Florenz und Wien im 17./18. Jahrhundert, Personenregister (bearbeitet), Staatsarchiv Luzern 1989.
13	Savoy Sardinia	company Swiss Guard	1579–1798, 1799–1802, 1814–1832	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz, Vierter Band, Neuenburg 1927. M.-N. Gysin: Les troupes suisses dans le royaume de Sardaigne, Revue Militaire Suisse, Band 59, Hefte 7 & 11, 1914.
14	Lucca	Swiss Federal Guard	1653–1806	Schürmann: Liste der Offiziere und Mannschaften der Schweizergarde in Lucca, 1653–1792. 1982. La Guardia Svizzera, archiv palazzo ducale di Lucca. Akte AKT 13/1114, Staatsarchiv Luzern.
15	Saxony	Swiss Guard	1656–1680, 1725–1757, 1763–1814	Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Vierter Band, Neuenburg 1927. Hugo Schneider: Eine Partisane aus der sächsischen Schweizergarde. Jahresbericht/ Schweizerisches Landesmuseum Zürich, Band 53, 1944. Alfred von Welck: Schweizer Soldtruppen in Kursächsischen Diensten 1701–1815. Neues Archiv für Sächsische Geschichte und Alterthumskunde, Herausgeber Dr. Hubert Ermisch, vierzehnter Band, Wilhelm Baensch, Königlich Sächsische Hofverlagsbuchhandlung, Dresden 1893.
16	Prussia	Swiss Palace Guard	1696–1713	Moritz von Wattenwil: Die Schweizer in fremden Kriegsdiensten. Separatdruck aus dem Berner Tagblatt, Bern 1930. Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz, Vierter Band, Neuenburg 1927. Alfred von Welck: Schweizer Soldtruppen in kursächsischen Diensten 1656-1681, Dr. Hubert Ermisch, Neues Archiv für Sächsische Geschichte, Band 13, S. 224, Wilhelm Baensch, Königlich Sächsische Hofverlagsbuchhandlung, Dresden 1892.
17	Naples	Swiss Guard Bataillon Swiss Guard Regiment	1734–1754 1754–1789	Robert-Peter Eyer: Die Schweizer Regimenter in Neapel im 18. Jahrhundert (1734–1789), Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften Peter Lang AG, Bern 2008. Heinrich Türler, Viktor Attinger, Marcel Godet: Historisch-Biographisches Lexikon der Schweiz, Vierter Band, Neuenburg 1927. Oskar Erismann: Die Schweizer in neapolitanischen Diensten, Blätter für bernische Geschichte, Kunst und Altertumskunde, Band 14, Heft 1, 1918.	18	Egypt	Swiss Guard	1882–1683	La Garde Européenne en Égypte, Librairie de H. Stapelmohr, Imprimerie Taponnier et Studer, Genève 1884. Kolonialismus in German, French and Italian in the online Historical Dictionary of Switzerland.Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:HDS): "Autor".	Illegal recruitment without permit of the Swiss Governement. Federal Law, regarding recruitment and admission to foreign military service (July 30, 1859): Article 1: Admission without Swiss governement permit to foreign troops not authorized as national by the respective state, is forbidden for every Swiss citizen [...].}}

- - Hello again Toni Moser. Thank you very much for the extensive additional material. When I have time to spare I will incorporate references in the article to those Swiss Guards not already listed. Regards Buistr (talk) 22:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lincoln green, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuban Cossacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preobrazhensky Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Bronkhorstspruit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Bullet for the General, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Jefe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to my edit on Storming of the Bastille

I see you have reverted my most recent edit to Storming of the Bastille. I would like to extend an apology, since I did not even realize that I had made that edit. My first edit to that page was reverting an edit from an IP that deleted the whole background section. I knew that it was a regular practice to put that section in history articles, so I restored it. At around 10:30 PM (my time, not utc), I reverted my first edit back to the version the IP had it. I wasn't even on my computer then, so I'm not sure what happened. It might be that I was using Twinkle for the first time and it malfunctioned. I'm not sure. If you know anything about it, let me know. And also, sorry again. Ghinga7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Buistr!

Happy New Year!

Buistr,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Cossacks

Hi Buistr

I notice you made a few edits to Cossacks, which I'm currently copy-editing as part of the current Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive (there's a copy-edit notice current at the top of the article). I made the spelling changes from British to American English for consistency with the rest of the article, which uses American spelling and dating conventions. This small section was the main deviation from that norm, in an article that's almost 12,000 words long.

I'd really appreciate it if you would hold off from editing while the copy edit is in progress, to avoid the risk of edit conflicts. It will be finished in a day or two. Thanks, and regards - FiveFaintFootprints (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Close order formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Sambre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain during World War I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fernando Po.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Papal Zouaves, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albano and Busby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armée d'Afrique

Hello, it is possible to add some more content about the Zouaves presence in mainland France, based on what you have read in Larcade, please? I've also added a comment in the talk section of the article. Thanks in advance Keith H99 (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, thank you for having taken the time to have provided a lengthy reply. I will reply via the "talk" page on the article. Regards Keith H99 (talk) 13:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Waltzing Matilda.

Thanks for that. I thought I'd spotted something. Beg pardon. Hengistmate (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cavalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jäger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William George Keith Elphinstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akbar Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chasseur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 18th Royal Hussars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Busby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revista de Historia Militar (ISSN 0482-5748) published by the Ejército de Tierra de España

Hello Buistr,

I am directly approaching you as one of the task force participants of the Spanish military history task force, which invites interested parties to contact you.

The magazine/academic journal by the Ministerio de Defensa of the Kingdom of Spain which I cited above has been published twice a year since 1957. I created its article (duly referenced to CSIC = the Spanish National Research Council), to Dialnet (an academic research network) of University of La Rioja, to the Real Colegio de Artillería, to the Ministry itself (ejercito.defensa.gob.es), and to a book, namely ISBN 978-84-617-2104-7, citing page 59.

Well, the English Wikipedia entry about Revista de Historia Militar has just now been draftified, four months later, and after others have contributed to it. I would appreciate it if you could have a gander at it, and, if you think it fair, push the big blue button "submit the draft for review!" if you deem it appropriate.

Note: a version of this article (in Spanish) exists at wikipedia in Spanish (I know we consider other wikipedias irrelevant, but it probably does not hurt to mention it).

Else, we can always delete it. I would appreciate any comments you may have. XavierItzm (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EASTEREGG

Hiya. Relative to this edit/RV, and in the context of the WP:EASTEREGG guideline ("link the phrase, not a single word"), how would the reader be expected to know that the target article, for the word "Swiss", is Swiss mercenaries? And not Swiss people or Switzerland or simply Swiss? Especially when none of the terms/words link in the same way? (Walloons, for example, just links to the article on the people/culture. To your own point, when the article deals specifically with Swiss mercenaries, why "hide" that fact? ) Guliolopez (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 77th Moplah Rifles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impressment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestry section

Greetings, I have seen your many edits on the article Carlota of Mexico, and could use your help. Do you know of anyone with a long history (such as yours) on Wikipedia that is knowledgeable on royalty and the rules for articles? There is one user (who called a couple others to bat for him) that is repeatedly deleting the ancestry section on Maximilian I of Mexico. They’re saying it isn’t inside the scope of the article. Yet I have given three sources and the very reason the Archduke was chosen as Mexican emperor was his ancestry. The overwhelming majority of articles on royals throughout Europe and elsewhere have their ancestry charts intact. The articles for Elizabeth II, George VI of the United Kingdom, Louis XV, Maria Theresa of Spain, Elisabeth of France, Mary of Teck, Franz Joseph I of Austria, Archduke Franz Karl of Austria, etc. all have them! Just thought I’d ask, if not, thanks for your time. CMD007 (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khaled Nezzar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FLN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Versailles rail accident

Thank you for catching my erroneous changes away from British English. However, it is not appropriate to refer to this disaster as an "accident."

Perhaps "accident" can be replaced with "derailment" or "disaster" (though in my view, crash would still be an appropriate word to use in this case). You can learn more about why "accident" is a poor word to use in this case, and nearly all like it.

Many reliable sources are shifting away from the use of the word "accident" all together. The AP Style Guide follows the same logic.

"Crash" is a shorter word that more accurately describes what happened. Let me know what you think and if you'd like to to replace accident with some of these other options. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further thought, I think "derailment" and in a couple of cases "disaster" is the best candidate for this article. I'll wait to hear your thoughts, but I am confident that either of these words is superior to "accident". Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pantalon rouge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarlet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Other campaigns" contribution in Oct 2012

Hi,

This needed to be added to French Army in World War I as it was a missing part of the story. I have been trying to up the article. Are you able to cite the source from where this comes from, please?

Cheers Keith H99 (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was very tired, and the request did not flow as it should have. Its horribly brusque when read after a full night's rest.

What I was trying to say is that back in 2012, there was no reference to the fact that French soldiers participated in campaigns other than the Western Front, and you rendered a great service in providing some text to that effect. Would it be possible to revisit this, and to add the source or sources from where this came from, please? Keith H99 (talk) 14:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for adding the source attribution. I have been trying to tidy up the article. The content you provided was great, but as part of the tidy-up, I wanted to attribute what we have to sources, to underline the credibility of the content. The comment on training was added by someone else, with whom I am going to ask for assistance. Have a great day! Keith H99 (talk) 11:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Buistr, I've come back to this

'According to the sources cited above a sizeable portion of the French troops utilised in the West African, Dardanelles and Palestine campaigns were North African and colonial units, both European and indigenous.'

Is it possible to have the specific pages from the books that raise this? On paper, there was one Colonial Division, and half of the infantry component from the 156th Infantry Division were six battalions associated with North African 19th Military Region. I'm trying to get things set in stone, so as to speak, and to remove ambiguities. Keith H99 (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I was under the impression that an academic had expressed their opinion in print. I had been expecting to see a reference to this, which is where I have had a misconception.

Is this your point of view, as informed by the sources that you mentioned, that the bulk of the French troops utilised in the Dardanelles and Palestine campaigns were Colonial or North African units? Keith H99 (talk) 07:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the assistance rendered. I had got it into my head that there was a particular publication, and could not get it out of my head. What you have been able to provide puts a lot of other elements of the article to shame, in respect of decent citations from reliable sources, so I consider this successfully concluded. Keith H99 (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second lieutenant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Osmund Somers Cleverly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]