[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Breaktheicees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Sabrina the Teenage Witch: The Album you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sabrina the Teenage Witch: The Album for comments about the article, and Talk:Sabrina the Teenage Witch: The Album/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 16:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:LeAnn Rimes § GA?. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting fake claims

[edit]

You posted a fake claim that the Maxi- Single of the Dance Mix for How Do I Live says the song is from You Light Up My Life and that is UNTRUE as I own the maxi-single and it does not say that. You have NO RELIABLE SOURCE to make the claim that the song is a single from the album SO STOP POSTING IT IS WHEN IT THERE IS NO SOURCE! 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:ACDF:905D:6E2F:97C (talk) 03:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is also the same with all the other songs you are claiming are singles from specific albums as there’s a difference between taken from and single from, just because something claims the song is taken from an album doesn’t mean it is a single from the album. Example, Unchained Melody by LeAnn Rimes was released twice, both on CD singles from songs off her album Blue, prior to its release on Unchained Melody: The Early Years, I also checked many of your web sources and none of them make any claims of songs being from albums, one was actually the charting position for the song “I Need You” and had nothing to do with the song “Soon” for example, check your sources your posting before you make false claims or don’t post fake sources that can be checked by people who own the actual source, like the How Do I Live (Dance Mix) Maxi-single, that can easily be checked by anyone who owns the actual CD and can be countered. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:ACDF:905D:6E2F:97C (talk) 03:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you keep vandalising many of the pages removing valid information, such as with the I Need You album, you remove the note about the misinformation on the back of the reissue track listing where soon is concerned and removing the single release date for One Way Ticket on the Blue album page. Jesus, anything to get your way huh, even if it’s vandalizing the page? 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:ACDF:905D:6E2F:97C (talk) 04:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is Wikipedia hun, you need to do proper sourcing not posting what you feel because you think it’s accurate or making up sources to support your claim when you can be checked and challenged, there’s a difference between phrasing. Songs when released as a single are stated as a single from said album, not taken from a specific album. I found it quite hilarious when I checked my own copy of How Do I Live (Dance Mixes) and you put a fake note of it claiming to be a single from You Light Up My Life, just to get your way. Please stop. Your sources can be checked to see if they are valid and a lot of them were not which is why I changed everything back to prior to your vandalism of the pages. And one finally note, you don’t post two albums on a single release, just one and it’s always the main album the song came from on a discography page, for example, But I Do Love You was released as a single from Coyote Ugly and that’s the main album even if it appeared on another, you don’t put “and” another album in that section, look at any other discography page and you won’t see one song that appears on two different albums saying it was a single from two albums, just one. So again, another vandalism on your part. Please stop making others fix your errors. Thank you. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:ACDF:905D:6E2F:97C (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given that you've already taken up quite a bit of space here with these rantings, I've posted an organized response to your talk page. Breaktheicees (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your grammar is bad. Taken from does not mean single from. Get it? You ignore sources and don’t read. If it doesn’t specifically say it is a single from the album it isn’t a single from the album. How unclear is that to you. None of your sources specifically say they are singles from the album. Got it? Not even the Billboard source it mentions the new version and that the song will be released to radio yes, HOWEVER it does not say it is a single from the album. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:4E6:30C4:763A:CC5F (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I disagree. Every single I've ever seen that says "taken from" means a single is from that album and is promoting the listed release. The Billboard source clearly mentions the new version in conjunction with the album release. You could make the case for many singles that don't specifically state they are from an album, using other words as monikers to show this. That doesn't mean they aren't singles from those albums. And again, you are ignoring the other source for "How Do I Live". Breaktheicees (talk) 05:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are no other sources to “How Do I Live” and you can disagree all you want but that’s grammar for you. You’re making moot points. And just cause the source mentions the new version in conjunction with the album it still doesn’t state it’s a single from the album. I mean this is Billboard we are talking about after all and as a news source for music they would clearly state that the song was being released as a single from the album if that was the case but I could sit there and say for example “LeAnn Rimes is releasing a new pop mix of “Blue” to pop radio station and is including it on 'Sittin' on Top of the World”, doesn’t mean the song is a single from the album when it was previously released on Blue. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:4E6:30C4:763A:CC5F (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is another source. It's a (still listed) book and I literally gave you the quote on one of your many talk pages. Mine vs. your definition of "taken from" isn't a grammar issue, it's an interpretation issue. Your example is moot because where a song was first placed does not necessarily mean it is considered as being from/promoting that album - see Madonna's version of "Love Don't Live Here Anymore". Breaktheicees (talk) 05:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to point out that Curb Records is not a very reliable source and has a reputation of promoting false claims, for example, they falsely claimed that Bill Mack waited years after Patsy Cline died to find the proper singer for the song “Blue”, however that wasn’t ever the case as there were other singers who recorded the song prior to LeAnn Rimes, so just cause Curb claims something, doesn’t make it true. Either way it goes, you and I obviously have very different definitions of the words taken from and single from so we are getting no where. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:4E6:30C4:763A:CC5F (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to think that if Curb Records is making the assertion that one of their releases is a single from one of their other releases, then this is probably accurate. You're comparing two totally different things here. Regardless of how you feel about the single release refs, there's still the issue of the valid book ref (which specifically states it is a single, like you wanted), and your changing of the chronological track listings on I Need You. The latter of which leaves no room for interpretation; listing it as is (out of order) is just incorrect. Breaktheicees (talk) 05:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just go to the fandom page of LeAnn Rimes instead of arguing. It’s much more reliable than Wikipedia is anyway, they falsely claim the demo Bill Mack recorded of “Blue” was released as a single when it wasn’t so this site will make any claim it wants, even falsely claim songs as singles from albums if they want to, this is why Wikipedia is not ever and will not ever be accepted as a reliable source because the editors on this site can make any claim they want, whether it’s true or not and if two or more people agree on one thing then the debate is over, so Wikipedia can post and spread misinformation all it wants. Don’t argue over something if you don’t like it. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and honestly, this seems to be something that should be debated by the whole community of Wikipedia if you ask me. 174.218.135.171 (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fandom page is not accurate and the I Need You page in particular has quite a few grammatical errors. So I'm guessing you're just going to ignore those two points then? Breaktheicees (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
May I also point your attention to this promo release from EMI Canada. In August, the promo says "from the upcoming Curb recording" [1]. Hmm, I wonder what that could be? In September, the following promo says "from the Curb Records recording You Light Up My Life"[2]. Also keep in mind that every single song on this promo is a single from the records that they are listed as being from. I would add these as yet another valid reference on the page but 3 is already excessive, in my opinion. Breaktheicees (talk) 09:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to put false information go on ahead. That’s all you’re doing and you’re being a vandal so go ahead. As was pointed out the fandom is more accurate of information and obviously doesn’t post bs claims unlike what you’re falsely posting because of your interpretation and the fact that YOU’RE WRONG. Sad people don’t admit their wrong or realize that just cause things state things doesn’t make them true obviously the one CD for How Do I Live is incorrect. The correct answer is: Just cause an extended mix appears on the You Light Up My Life CD does not make How Do I Live a single from the album. You will not admit this because of false advertising and people making incorrect claims. And the book you posted is not also correct because that’s what the author claims, again doesn’t make it factual. Anyone can write mistakes in a book. I could write a book saying that “Blue” was a single from Sittin on Top of the World and you’d believe it. Good day. SMH. Sad how people will believe anything. 2600:1015:B1E4:F59E:4E6:30C4:763A:CC5F (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fandom page is not accurate . Excuse me? Uh, don’t come at my fandom, it’s way more accurate than you are @Breaktheicees, my fandom calls out Wikpedia for how unreliable it is and bans it from being used as a source because of biased users like you who go around posting untrue claims based on personal misinterpretation of words or things not stated outright. I also don’t allow use of compilations like you showed for “How Do I Live” because those CDs were published by a third-party and they can put whatever they want on them. Same with certain books that are published, authors can make inaccurate claims in books all the time. It is common knowledge that Rimes’ “How Do I Live” was not ever intended on being a single from You Light Up My Life: Inspirational Songs because it was suppose to be a single from Con Air before Disney decided to go with Trisha Yearwood behind her and her label’s back. That controversy was well reported. So I repeat, don’t go saying my fandom is inaccurate, in fact Fandoms are a heck of a lot more accurate than Wikipedia will ever be because they don’t do biased editing. They stick to reliably sourced facts and information. They aren’t barred from being used in schools as a source UNLIKE Wikipedia is. So really, who’s more accurate, a fan run wiki or the one banned from being used as a course by schools? Should be pretty obvious. 174.218.135.171 (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, if you ever came on my fandom @Breaktheiceesdoing what you’re doing here on Wikipedia, you’d be indefinitely banned for massive vandalism. Please keep off my fandom and keep your opinions about inaccuracy to yourself because Wikipedia is the most inaccurate source on the internet. 174.218.135.171 (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The use of multiple dynamic IPs throughout these pages has me assuming you're same user. EMI Music Canada is not a third party, nor is this release of Blue released by them [3]. There's also another single release, by Curb, that states specifically - "the original track recorded by LeAnn Rimes for her album You Light Up My Life". It doesn't get much more clear than that. I fail to see how Wikipedia being used in schools is relevant to this nor do I really care about your probably impossible to prove comment about Fandom not being barred, so, no comment. Breaktheicees (talk) 11:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Anti-Flame Barnstar
For staying civil, calm and collected when confronted by this user Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you blank and redirect an article, it is generally good practice to add a {{Blank and redirect notice}} to the target article and notify the article creator and/or editors with high authorship. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 17:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you. I wasn't aware of the notice, and your change to redirect it to the fashion section specifically is better. I didn't think it was worthwhile to notify anyone though because it hasn't had any significant development/high authorship since its creation in 2006, and the article creator hasn't been active in well over a decade. Breaktheicees (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]