User talk:Addisonstrack

Guy Fawkes

This was your edit, which reverted User:Grunt's reversion of vandalism, putting the vandal image back in the article. Nufy8 16:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone beat me to the revert and I inadvertantly reverted the revert. Say that three times fast. Addisonstrack 13:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen

Please do not insert it without support at the WP:BLPN or the talkpage thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content is weakly cited and excessively reported resulting in an attack article. The content is cited to no widly read national publications at all, the only even close to a wp reliable is the ink article and the forum posts are not reliaable and the primary reports are close to OR reporting, have you got any major publications that are reporting this issue to show it is actually noteworthy Off2riorob (talk) 15:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an argument that more properly belongs on the talk page of the article you are trying to blank. When you try to remove large sections of articles and find yourself disputing the edits with other editors, the appropriate forum is the Talk page. Addisonstrack (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]