User talk:67.173.23.66

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This host, c-67-173-23-66.hsd1.il.comcast.net (67.173.23.66), is registered to Comcast Cable Communications LLC and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Stephanie Tubbs Jones and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! paul2520 💬 13:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm JBchrch. An edit that you recently made to 1968 US Senate election in Alabama seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JBchrch (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It was not a test, I accidentally deleted too much, so I readded what I didn't mean to delete.67.173.23.66 (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bobby Rush—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 15:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources.67.173.23.66 (talk) 21:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of coupled cousins, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. It's gold rose! Can't believe it? 16:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I gave an edit reason for the removal. It was so that the dates would properly sort in chronological order.67.173.23.66 (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of coupled cousins. It's gold rose! Can't believe it? 16:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did give edit reasons for the removal. I said that I removed locations so that the dates properly sort in chronological order.

Reply to your comment on my talk page

I'm posting this in case the notification system does not work: please see User talk:DocWatson42#Wellstone successor. —DocWatson42 (talk)

Responded to your comment on your talk page.67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of royal weddings have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I removed them because the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of royal weddings was to limit the list to weddings with articles.67.173.23.66 (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, didn't realise they were just redirects. KylieTastic (talk) 15:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good.67.173.23.66 (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is there a consensus that they should be included? If so that would effect many other past elections. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is an WP:EDITCONSENSUS as they have been up for a while. If you are challenged, which you were, then the onus is on you to get consensus for removal. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that none of the previous elections features such images, so those ones seem like outliers.67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to seek consensus for standardization, but no such standardization exists yet. The proper forum for that is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. If we are rigid in requiring that arbitrary past article formats be applied to future articles, the encyclopedia will never get a chance to change for the better. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Brought it up there.67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. And hey, sorry for the template. You are clearly editing in good faith. It's unconscious IP discrimination, I suppose. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries.67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to follow-up on what Tartan357 said. I'm the guy who essentially started the gallery thing; it was only an experiment at first, but I guess it caught on at some point. Like I said on the Florida articles, I would not be necessarily opposed to removal, but it would definitely require a consensus via at least an RfC at this point. Curbon7 (talk) 23:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Curbon7, there is now an RfC: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RfC about primary candidate photos in election articles. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of coupled cousins, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JellyMan9001 (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I wasn’t making test edits. I was reverting a change made against consensus. The reason there was multiple edits was because I had to revert each of the edits. I’ll link to the thread in my edit reason.67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, my bad. JellyMan9001 (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries.67.173.23.66 (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you find the next longest reigning monarch (for top list)?

Hey, I noticed that you added a new guy to the list after removing Alfonso. May I ask, do you have your own list/resources of these guys? Or do you have an effective way of finding guys off that list? It's very tedious otherwise. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I looked in the page history to before the page was limited to top 100 (around early 2017) and put the person next in line.67.173.23.66 (talk) 00:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Joyce-stick. I noticed that you recently removed content from Buddy Leach without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Joyce-stick (talk) 19:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I removed it because he is deceased, thus he is no longer in the order of precedence, as it's for living people. To quote the page for order of precedence it is "thee ceremonial order, or relative preeminence, for domestic and foreign government officials (military and civilian) at diplomatic, ceremonial, and social events within the United States and abroad." He's deceased, so he obviously can't attend any social events and wouldn't have a ceremonial seating precedence. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 19:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! – S. Rich (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.