User talk:8lgm
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Floribert N'Galula
[edit]I've taken it to AfD to see what others think of it. Spiderone (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Removing POB
[edit]If you look at all the Good Articles and Featured Articles then the POB is in the infobox only. Also the manual of style has this. Yes it can be mentioned in the early life section but this isn't compulsory. Spiderone 08:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also read this Spiderone 15:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Bridie O'Toole
[edit]Hello 8lgm, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Bridie O'Toole has been removed. It was removed by 116.14.131.105 with the following edit summary '(How do I at refrences? Cheers - Anita)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 116.14.131.105 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Derek Armstrong
[edit]The article states he is the current Technical Director at the Nomads, but the Nomads article states the club is defunct. - Dudesleeper talk 13:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alec Gaskell, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/player2/alecgaskell.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Derek Armstrong (footballer)
[edit]Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I took a leap of faith by disambiguating his place of birth to Pendleton, Lancashire and not Pendleton, Greater Manchester in the hope that you might be able to clear it up. - Dudesleeper talk 02:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ashton National F.C. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Storye book (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Just a note to say well done for your neat little article on this man. I had never heard of him, but what an amazing life story.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Ashton National F.C.
[edit]Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Walter Cornock
[edit]Gatoclass 00:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Watford L.F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
A WikiProject for women in the sports
[edit]Bonjour , please read this Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Women's Sport , bon week-end --Geneviève (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Leeds Ladies player category
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Leeds Carnegie L.F.C. players
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Leeds Carnegie L.F.C. players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I moved it over to Category:Leeds United L.F.C. players Clavdia chauchat (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Template:Leeds Carnegie L.F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 11:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Template:Truro City F.C. managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BigDom (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Category:Dutch female footballers
[edit]Category:Dutch female footballers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:Droylsden F.C. managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
[edit]Happy New Year from the Women's Football Task Force! |
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles throughout the year. 2014 is looking bright! We're glad to have you as a contributing member of the Women's Football Task Force and hope to see more of your great work in the new year. Cheers! |
Task force quick links |
Open Tasks | Recognized content | Members | Resources New! Portal:Women's association football |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Nottingham Forest L.F.C. squad
[edit]Template:Nottingham Forest L.F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JMHamo (talk) 21:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An invitation for you
[edit]
Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the... | |
Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes (including WOSO players) are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport.
#wikiwomeninred
|
(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC))
Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017
[edit]
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017 |
Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO? |
According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017. What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome. |
New initiatives have been created for:
While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}. Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page. |
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
WOSO Task Force News: April 2018
[edit]
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018 |
Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. squad
[edit]Template:Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hi mate no offence intended with this I'll be bringing it back when normal service is resumed and they're back amongst the big girls. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019
[edit]
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019 |
Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going. WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST! Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126 Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}. These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)
Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020
[edit]
WP:WOSO News: October 2020 |
Hello WOSO editors! Fall Focus: FA WSL articles
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors. Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) _October_2020" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Natalie Brewer for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Brewer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Nicola Twohig for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Twohig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Danielle Sheen for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Sheen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Nicola Harding for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Harding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Suzanne Davies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficent notable coverage since 2012; Orphan article since 2019; Dead external link
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Suzanne Davies for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzanne Davies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Category:Blackburn Rovers L.F.C. players has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Blackburn Rovers L.F.C. players has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Your article Patrizia Panico
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Patrizia Panico to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Joeykai (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)