Talk:Wilton Mall
| |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]I deleted this because it's a shopping mall. There are millions of buildings and malls in the world, few of them have any significance. In the interest of Wikipedia not being an indiscriminate list of trivia, I don't think we should encourage this sort of thing. Thoughts? Friday (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Can we talk about the merits of the article instead of arguing procedure? I don't want to list this on the already overcrowded and dysfunctional Afd if there's a way to avoid it. Friday (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- People are working on this page, and so I don't think it's appropriate to just blank the page on them based on your personal opinion. Is XD still alive anyway? There are better and more adopted mechanisms like prod going these days, and a sample of the XD7 category indicate you are virtually alone. I think there is enough here that a reasonable article could be built including historical information, etc. I would label it as a stub and move on. However, I would not vote against deletion. I just think your blanking of the page is presumptuous, particularly when it's replaced after a user edits it. cmh 15:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, no arguments here. The only reason I re-XD'd is it that no explanation was offered at all against the argument for deletion. In fact, I still haven't heard any arguments against deletion. This appears to be Just Another Mall, same as millions of others in the world. There's nothing to be said about it except for trivia. Friday (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- People are working on this page, and so I don't think it's appropriate to just blank the page on them based on your personal opinion. Is XD still alive anyway? There are better and more adopted mechanisms like prod going these days, and a sample of the XD7 category indicate you are virtually alone. I think there is enough here that a reasonable article could be built including historical information, etc. I would label it as a stub and move on. However, I would not vote against deletion. I just think your blanking of the page is presumptuous, particularly when it's replaced after a user edits it. cmh 15:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Former Tenants
[edit]- Afterthoughts
- Annie’s Gourmet Ice Cream
- Athlete’s Foot
- Athletic Kids
- A & W
- Barbara Moss
- Bavarian Pretzel
- Cartoon Corner
- Casual Corner
- Champs Sports
- County Seat
- Cutlery World
- Cutting Crew
- CVS
- Deb Shop
- Earring Tree
- Earth Shop
- Eye World
- Freshens Yogurt
- Friar Tuck Bookstore
- Gadzooks
- Gap
- Garden Botanika
- J. Riggings
- Kinney Shoes
- Klein’s All Sports
- Lady Foot Locker
- Lane Bryant
- Lazerpix
- Lechters
- McDonalds
- Merry Go Round
- N.Fox Jewelers
- Nature’s Touch
- $9.99 Stockroom
- Northern Reflections
- Office m’Art
- Original Cookie Co.
- Pagemax
- Petite Sophisticate
- Pet World
- Pizza Hut
- Rocky Mountain Traders
- Ruffino’s Pastries
- Something Sweet
- Time Out Amusement
- Wilson’s Leather
- Yester Year Gifts
(moved from main page by TenPoundHammer 22:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC))
closures
[edit]Closures should be removed as they become increasingly more irrelevant quivkly what do you think?Incredible93 (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Closures are important to anyone who's interested in the history of the Mall. Also, I see no reason to remove the "Movie theater" section. M.Bitton (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)