[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Piasecki PA-97 Helistat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that there are now two of these beasties, it may be worth extracting the helistat content to its own article, rather than just redirecting to the PA-97 Andy Dingley (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the term helistat has become synonymous with the PA-97. If and when the media starts referring to the JHL-40 as a helistat I would support disambiguating the term, but I think doing it now would be premature. BradV 21:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree with BradV the term Helistat is only associated with the PA-97. MilborneOne (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Screw the media, what do they know? "Helistat" is the technology. I don't know if Boeing will ever use the term (it wasn't invented there, I very much doubt it). However it is a shared technology that is (and actually has always been) worthy of a separate article, should anyone care to write it. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Piasecki PA-97. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]