This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intellectual property, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Intellectual propertyWikipedia:WikiProject Intellectual propertyTemplate:WikiProject Intellectual propertyIntellectual property articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
I am a nuclear engineer and have looked at every bit of what's available for what they've provided. It's all fake. These are just computer graphics models that the folks behind it are using to inflate their reputability in the eyes of laypeople. I want to edit the page to make it more factually accurate, but that would require some pretty serious overhauling, and it differs from the mainstream view on it.
I feel that if I were to propose such changes, I'd need to provide a more detailed primary source explaining why we know it's the case. Would linking to a blog post on my own website suffice? Gavin Ridley (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given that all nuclear fission power plants that "burn" uranium are capable (at least in theory) of producing weapons grade plutonium, has anyone of note raised concerns that making "how to build a nuclear power plant" as accessible as "how to write an app" (well, in terms of "can I get the manual online for free", not in terms of "having the manual, what can I actually do") would lead to more and more actors (both "rogue state" and "nonstate") could gain access to more of the components needed to produce nuclear weapons? Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
