[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Nick McKenzie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NSW found McKenzie's 60 Minutes report defamatory

[edit]

Why is this not mentioned anywhere? https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/01/business/peter-schiff-defamation-settlement-nine.html Reading the article you'd think McKenzie is an exceptional journalist yet the Supreme Court of NSW found his report defamatory. At the very least this should be mentioned here. 115.70.36.116 (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the banner up above which has the heading "Current consensus ..." TarnishedPathtalk 13:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page includes other civil trials where the decision was favourable to McKenzie. Why not include trials where he lost? This was a NSW Supreme court decision. The defendants admitted to defamation in the settlement in addition to the judge's ruling. 115.70.36.116 (talk) 11:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to this discussion for any questions you might have. TarnishedPathtalk 11:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]