Talk:NESN

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts / Boston / New Hampshire / Rhode Island / Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by Boston Bruins task force.

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Organizing

To organize this article even more, I propose we use the following sections:

1. About NESN / History / Introduction
2. Red Sox Coverage
3. Boston Bruins Coverage
4. NESN SportsDesk
5. List of Shows
6. List of Commentators/Reporters

I will overhaul the article this way soon... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RyanMcK (talk • contribs) 1:39, May 10, 2006 (UTC).

It is done...I decided to stray from this forum just a bit, but otherwise, it is good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RyanMcK (talk • contribs) 12:37, May 14, 2006 (UTC).

Merge SportsDesk into NESN page

There just isn't enough info about SportsDesk to make it notable enough to deserve a page of its own. Check out the current SportsDesk page and you'll see there's not much more info there than there is on the NESN page. Doc502 04:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Remdawg's" Link

I noticed that when you click on this Link in the "Trivia" section, then it redirects to the Jerry Remy page. This link should either be removed or someone should create an article about the restaurant Remdawgs, as that is what it is. I'm not good at making stuff on Wikipedia, so I don't suggest I do it, but someone please change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppierce365 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Announcers for Red Sox Games

What is the best way to clean up this table, having the list of guest booth announcers for 2009, as well as all the people who pop in and out of the Studio to be distracting and throwing off the visual appearance. What about a different table below it for all the people who rotate through the studio as well as the rotating guests for 2009 in the booth? 216.211.255.98 (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Would it be useful to have an infobox like was done for the YES Network and SNY? --Coingeek (talk) 01:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update NESN Logo

Web Developer for NESN here. I uploaded the most recent version of our logo in high-resolution to Wikimedia. You'll notice the blue is darker. We use a variety of blues, but #004276 is deemed the official NESN blue. Here is the new ticket:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NESN_Logo.png (1088 x 354)

Not quite sure how to associate this image with the article, so I'll leave that to the Wikipedia experts.

Peace!
- Jeff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkereako (talk • contribs) 23:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT

Nevermind, Wikimedia deleted the image I uploaded because it didn't contain a valid license. I dunno how to edit the license information nor do I feel like figuring out how. Sorry fellas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkereako (talk • contribs) 16:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It started before 1984

As a Canadian Maritimer, the Canadian provinces that border Maine, and the "Boston States," I can assure you that Bangor, Maine's NBC affiliate WLBZ-TV, Channel 2, carried the New England Sports Network, as I was able to watch the Red Sox vs the Yankees in their great rivalry years 1977-1978. At the time, the NESN was TV-38 Boston. Could citations be found to support this, or at least support the 1984 version of NESN? Cause I know what I watched back in the 1970s.--Abebenjoe (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on New England Sports Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071112134212/http://broadcastengineering.com:80/infrastructure/broadcasting_nesn_hits_home/ to http://broadcastengineering.com/infrastructure/broadcasting_nesn_hits_home/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 September 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Listed for two weeks with only one comment opposing. Unlikely that further relists will generate more discussion. I'm closing this as no consensus. If someone wants to try for an RM again in a month with better sourcing for the claim of COMMONNAME, no prejudice against that.(non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New England Sports Network → NESN – It seems as if today and throughout the article, the channel is just simply referred to as "NESN" and not by its abbreviation, so it would make more sense to title it "NESN". JE98 (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Would Mid-Atlantic Sports Network also be part of this move request for the same reason? ONR (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose but suggest relist again. Current policy/guidelines don't seem to cover this well. Reliable sources may well prefer the TLAE, but it's of only local usage and likely to mean something else or nothing at all to most readers, so it's not recognisable. Andrewa (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New England Sports Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021025920/http://www.nbcrightnow.com/story/26681849/fxfl-to-be-carried-on-espn3 to http://www.nbcrightnow.com/story/26681849/fxfl-to-be-carried-on-espn3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful links

Hello!

Here are some helpful links that could help expand the other shows section:

http://golfdestination.tv/

http://dirtywatermedia.com/category/dirty-water-tv/

https://theherrenproject.org/thp-featured-on-nesn-celebrity-spotlight-series/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmac0520 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the pages to the proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Per this discussion, which cited WP:NATURAL. 100.7.36.213 (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: These are common names, one of which actually used by the network. The FS1 situation is different because FS1 needs disambiguation, but the other ones are either the primary topic or an unique acronym. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I may ask, which one is "actually used by the network"? 100.7.36.213 (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose regarding NESN and NBCSN, as they do not currently require disambiguation. However, MASN does require a MASN (disambiguation), so I'm neutral on that one pending any other evidence. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Honestly, I have my doubts MASN (disambiguation) is a necessary page. Would Moving Anthropology Student Network really survive an AFD? I don't see anything on Link 22 about that sort of MASN either (although it exists). Nohomersryan (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't think it's notable enough to survive an AFD. We should nominate it for deletion as soon as possible. 100.7.36.213 (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. per ViperSnake. This seems a bit pointy too. Calidum 14:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I agree in hindsight. I don't think I fully understood WP:NATURAL. 100.7.36.213 (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.