Talk:Mhow

India: Cities / Madhya Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

I would suggest removing the line "Let us see how long it is before Mhow gets its municipality." This looks like more of a wish rather than content.

srangwal 20:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Armybrat 10:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)== Etymology section ==[reply]

The Etymology section has too many weasel words:

It is believed that MHOW is an acronym for 'Military Headquarters of Western India'. Another commonly heard expansion of MHOW is 'Military Headquarters of War'. However, it is also suggested that the village which existed on the site prior to the foundation of the British cantonment was called Mhow Gaon (Mhow village), and therefore these acronyms may not be the origin of the name "Mhow".

Believed by whom? Commonly heard by whom? Also suggested by whom? Does anyone have reliable sources which give info about this? --Kprateek88(Talk | Contribs) 10:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Yes the MHOW being equivalent to headquarters of war bit is widely known in but nobody can point out a valid reference. I would like to point out that the links in the article are broken. Armybrat 10:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition

{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:05, 21 June 2008 Italic textÀ hi i am prakash patidar i live in ambachandan my co, no.9691898706

Kripalu Maharaj in Mhow

In one of his telecast discourses, Jagadguru Kripalu Maharaj mentioned an incident from his childhood that he fell off his bicycle due to overconfidence while trying to ride it. He said that it happened in "mau chaavni" (in Hindi), Mhow Cantonment. Kanchanamala (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religions in Mhow

How can Buddhists have 5.0% plus once again 0.5% under "others"? What's the source for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.149.124 (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Religions

The 30%, 30% distribution is obviously incorrect. And the number of Buddhists is inaccurate.

What is the source of this random data?

Requested move 8 March 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Ambedkar Nagar → Mhow – "Dr. Ambedkar Nagar" is the official name, but "Mhow" is the common name. The page was moved from Mhow to the current name in 2018 without any discussion. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Clear common name for nearly 200 years. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.