Talk:Lotus 38

American Open Wheel Racing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject American Open Wheel Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of open wheel auto racing in the United States, with an emphasis on IndyCar racing, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American Open Wheel RacingWikipedia:WikiProject American Open Wheel RacingTemplate:WikiProject American Open Wheel RacingAmerican Open Wheel Racing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Race Results

There is an error in this section. Jim Clark, in the Lotus 38/1, won the '65 Indy by over two full laps (119 seconds), the article states there were 4 other cars on the lead lap, this is not the case. The confusion may come from the fact that Indy rules at the time allowed cars that were lapped to continue racing until they had reached 200 laps. At the time, Mario Andretti (R) and Parnelli Jones were in a tight battle for 2nd place, they were allowed to race two more laps to determine 2nd place (won by Jones). After 2nd place was established, the race was then flagged (Miller, 4th, and Johncock 5th, were on the same lap as Jones and Andretti). Ref.: http://www.racer.com/indianapolis-500-centenary-countdown-jim-clark-at-the-brickyard/article/195377/2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.165.212.179 (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Racing car template

I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 10:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"...full tubular monocoque"

Unless I'm very much mistaken (which my wife tells me I often am) that's rather a contradiction or confusion of terms, isn't it? There are tubular chassis. There are monocoque chassis. There are tubular subframes bolted to monocoque chassis. But a tubular monocoque? Unless it is being suggested that the monocoque components create a "tube" - which is a stretch I think.--Kcrossle (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is indeed what is being suggested - confusingly I agree. Previous Lotus monocoques were bathtubs - the 38 had the first all-round monocoque. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]