[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Korea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeKorea was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 24, 2004, August 22, 2005, and August 22, 2006.

Addition

[edit]

I think the December 1991 agreement between the two Koreas should be listed in the Establishment section of the infobox because it is an important document of Korea to establish the foundation of relations between the two Koreas. Perhaps we also need to mention this document in the main section of the article. https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/%EB%82%A8%EB%B6%81%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%98_%ED%99%94%ED%95%B4%EC%99%80_%EB%B6%88%EA%B0%80%EC%B9%A8_%EB%B0%8F_%EA%B5%90%EB%A5%98%C2%B7%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5%EC%97%90_%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C_%ED%95%A9%EC%9D%98%EC%84%9C Newwikinguser (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this document is more important than the Panmunjom Declaration. Newwikinguser (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter if you personally assign more importance to one event over another. What matters is do reliable sources also argue that the event you are advocating for is notable. Yue🌙 23:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I find a reliable source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1991/12/13/two-koreas-pledge-to-end-aggression/d104ab96-1a85-4024-8b61-bf9e43d779eb/ Newwikinguser (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also this: https://2001-2009.state.gov/t/ac/rls/or/2004/31012.htm Newwikinguser (talk) 12:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And this: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/13/world/koreas-sign-pact-renouncing-force-in-a-step-to-unity.html Newwikinguser (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources merely attest to the agreements existence, but where does it say that any of them that in retrospect it is a historically important event, more important than other attempts at peace and unification from then till now? You made an argument and you have yet to provide a reliable source that backs up your argument, leading me to believe that it is a personal opinion of yours. I also find it suspicious that when one specific detail, which has been repeatedly added by sockpuppets of a blocked user, was removed, your account was created not even a day later advocating a similar but alternate detail be added in its place. Yue🌙 03:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 September 2024

[edit]

In the second paragraph of the Prehistory subsection of the History section of the “Korea” page…

Change “The linguistic homeland of Proto-Koreans is located somewhere in Southern Siberia/Manchuria, such the Liao river area or the Amur region.”

…to…

“The linguistic homeland of Proto-Koreans is located somewhere in Southern Siberia/Manchuria, such as the Liao river area or the Amur region.”

…by adding “as” before “the Liao river”. The Return of Baba (talk) 01:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Yue🌙 02:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Korea&oldid=1252098205"