Ortiz v. Jordan
| Ortiz v. Jordan | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided January 24, 2011 | |
| Full case name | Ortiz v. Jordan |
| Citations | 562 U.S. 180 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | |
Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.[1][2]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]External links
[edit]This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |