User talk:Willform

Willform, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Willform! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm AleatoryPonderings. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kweisi Mfume, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also review WP:MOS, WP:RS, WP:BLP, and WP:ES. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kevin McAleenan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 22:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sdrqaz. An edit that you recently made to Cabinet of Joe Biden seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sdrqaz (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 22:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Proud Boys, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bacondrum (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 Edit to Miniso

Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your recent edits to the article because no sources were provided for the claims. Please remember to provide reliable sources when adding content to articles. --haha169 (talk) 03:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Richard Bong, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events

Hello! I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject. You seem to have an interest in editing Portal:Current events, so this would be a good place to work and meet other editors that want to improve similar areas on Wikipedia. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 01:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at America First (policy), you may be blocked from editing. Night S H I F T (49) (talk) 17:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 06:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kyle Kulinski, you may be blocked from editing. Do not edit biographies of living people to call them potentially incendiary terms such as "far-left" without any sources or edit summaries. The leading paragraph should reflect the content of the article, and referring to an individual as being either far-left, far-right, etc. requires citing multiple quality secondary sources. Vanilla Wizard 💙 21:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor not using edit summaries. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 17:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Caitlyn Jenner, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Louis J. Marinelli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 08:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conservative Party (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Build Back Better. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Woodstock 50, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 18:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thích Nhất Hạnh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. What was your source for "Within hours of his death, tributes from eminent Buddhist monks of various traditions and luminaries issued statements of condolences and praise. The Dalai Lama issued a statement recognizing Nhất Hạnh for his efforts in fostering and promoting peaceful means. Reflecting his tradition, Nhất Hạnh’s memorial at Từ Hiếu and his centers worldwide were conducted in a simplified manner." ? MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Thích Nhất Hạnh

On 27 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Thích Nhất Hạnh, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thriley (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skanda (Buddhism), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anjali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kyle Kulinski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 00:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Karl Rock, you may be blocked from editing. — NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 21:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Olivia Newton-John. Sundayclose (talk) 20:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarconiCheese (talk) 03:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Bloch (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British Indians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leader of the Conservative Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tulsi Gabbard, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CIreland (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Death and state funeral of Jiang Zemin

added links pointing to Zhang Jun, Li Bin, Wang Yong, Ma Biao and Su Hui

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Please do not repeatedly add unsourced information as you did here, here, here, and here unless you have WP:Reliable sources to back those statements up. The CNN reference currently in the article [1] says he immigrated from China. Some1 (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Some1 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rose Parade floats, you may be blocked from editing. Floatjon (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, you may be blocked from editing. –DMartin 22:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Dmartin969. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saturday Night Live Korea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –DMartin 06:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sona Movsesian. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –DMartin 06:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mt. San Antonio College, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –DMartin 06:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kyle Kulinski, you may be blocked from editing. –DMartin 06:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Fulton J. Sheen. –DMartin 16:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add claims to articles without citing a reliable source, as you did at this edit on John McCain. While unsourced edits are subject to reversion, I did not revert the edit. I did have to reword it and add a citation. You have been warned several times now. Please be more careful and consider your future edits carefully, or you could be blocked from editing. –DMartin 17:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Late Show with Stephen Colbert ‎, you may be blocked from editing. –DMartin 23:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"賀錦麗" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 賀錦麗 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9 § 賀錦麗 until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jimmy Dore, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Miner Editor (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold off putting the term end for members of Thai cabinet

The new prime minister has been elected, but the new cabinet hasn't been announced. Thus the incumbents are still in office unless they resign before the new minister being appointed (in which case you need to provide sources). There is even an official incumbent cabinet meeting today (29 August). Aithus (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, World War III, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Until you can add a citation for this, it doesn't belong in the article yet. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DDMS123 (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Seymour

Please do not add deputy prime minister to the infobox. It is not 2025 yet, so it does not need to be there. It is just like how when Christopher Luxon was still the incoming prime minister, that was never shown in the infobox. It was reverted immediately. EVen in other pages about the current NZ Government, it does not put deputy prime minister next to David Seymour's name. It is already mentioned in the prose, so it does not need to be in the infobox. Please also don't make anymore unnecessary reverts. Also, for your information, David Seymour will be the 21st deputy prime minister. He will not be the 14th. Winston Peters is labelled as the 13th because he was deputy three times before. The 14th deputy prime minister was Wyatt Creech. DDMS123 (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bhaisajyaguru, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 11:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Tucker Carlson, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 04:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please ensure you always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 14:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you always edit without using an edit summary. Please stop doing this and make sure you always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, please check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 13:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2028 Summer Olympics has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 13:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page John Major. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 14:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see WP:BLPCRIME. A strong reliable source will be needed to support the name (note WP:NYPOST too). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"He Jinli" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect He Jinli has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 31 § He Jinli until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"賀錦麗" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 賀錦麗 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 31 § 賀錦麗 until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Democratic National Convention, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington and 1999 (song).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]