Sunuraju

Hello, Sunuraju! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 04:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Sunuraju,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. ​

Best regards, Howdoesitgo1 (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For very good work! Howdoesitgo1 (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

		The Outlaw Halo Award
		Howdoesitgo1 (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC) (about the award)

This editor is a
Veteran Editor III
and is entitled to display this
Silver Editor Star.

Rough and Tough

Do you in which year was Kannada film Rough and Tough released?PhysicsScientist (talk) 07:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Rough and Tough

I want year of release of Rough and Tough.PhysicsScientist (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Vegetarian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nairspecht Converse 14:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Even if English is not your first language, I appreciate your work in Asian cinema articles. Keep trying.

Sro23 (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the W (TV series) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Revenge anime and manga has been nominated for discussion

Category:Revenge anime and manga, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 10:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 21st Busan International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last Princess. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Why did you move Justin Lee (criminal)

Hello. You just moved Justin Lee (criminal) to Justin Lee sex scandal. Why did you do that? There is a discussion ongoing. Please revert the move. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

I see that you have reverted the move. Thank you so much! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Request to add sources

Please see this discussion. In my closure of this discussion I explained the need to add sources that certain anime or manga contain a revenge theme. Since you are the creator of Category:Revenge anime and manga and have added all of the articles to it, I ask this from you. Please make sure to add only anime or manga in which revenge is a dominant theme to this category, and please add a source when you do so. Please also add sources to the articles that remain in the category, if you can, otherwise the category can be removed from them. Debresser (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

You are hereby warned, that if you continue to add contested and unsourced categories to articles, you risk you edit privileges being restricted. Debresser (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sunuraju. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sunuraju. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

References

Hi. As the example for what you did in Jin Se-yeon page, please don't be lazy and try to write the proper ref. next time. With title, date, website name, author, etc. Not only the link. And if a celebrity already has a career/biography section, it's better to put the ref. in there rather than headline. If u already have the time to put a link of ref. in a page, please put in more time to write it properly. Thanks. --Vanca92 (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Agree With Vanca92. See WP:Reflinks. 220 of ^Borg 02:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kanojo wa Uso o Aishisugiteru, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
  What is the point of just dumping bare URL links to sources, when you are not adding any content?? For example here. 220 of ^Borg 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mystery Queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Choi Kang-hee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bombay Dada

Hello Sunuraju,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bombay Dada for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark^Dask 22:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Song Joong-ki

Hi. Is it really necessary to add 5 references that all say the same thing just to support one sentence? What you're doing is citation overkill. Moreover, the excessive citations you are adding are bare urls, at least fill in the citations if you're going to add them. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Sunuraju, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 15:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Spacecowboy420. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Kim Ki-duk have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Nonsense English

Sorry, but I don't think your English is good enough to contribute towards English language wikipedia.

"Kim Jee-woon will live action remake titled In-Rang will stars Kang Dong-won , Jung Woo-sung and Han Hyo-joo in leading roles" is full of mistakes.

Perhaps you could consider contributing towards a different wikipedia in your native language? That might be easier for you. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sunuraju. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Review Your Article

Hi Sunuraju,

I have nomination your article for GA. You are invited in Talk:My Love from the Star/GA1. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 (TALK) 04:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Citing

Please properly cite your source. Don't just add the link. You can use this Template:Cite news or you can activate Wikipedia:RefToolbar by going here Gadgets and selecting refToolbar. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sunuraju. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for heads up

Hi Sunu, you picked the best of the citations between The Korea Herald and The Korea Times. I will add some info. about Kangin later, but looks like he is not involved. Thanks! have fun editing!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson

Hello, thanks for editing on Wikipedia. I undid your revision to the article Robert Pattinson, due to the fact that he is not confirmed as Batman and is merely on a short list of actors that Matt Reeves wants to play the Dark Knight. Please refrain from adding this revision until he has been officially confirmed. Thanks again.  GrendelNightmares  (talk) 04:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Godfrey Gao

On 27 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Godfrey Gao, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Globe Award for Best Actor – Television Series Drama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Miss International 2020. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please provide RS if you wish to add new details on venue/location of the competition. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Non-free content use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Miss Universe Philippines 2020, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Aaryan33056. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Ansel Elgort have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Allegations, unconfirmed, we don't do rumors. References to them are irrelevant at this time. Aaryan ^{📬 • 🥰} 04:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nakshathrakoodaram

The article Nakshathrakoodaram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, only things found during a WP:BEFORE is links to soundtrack for film, and online film databases. No independent reviews found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunil Vayassu 20 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunil Vayassu 20 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Vayassu 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sreedharante Onnam Thirumurivu

The article Sreedharante Onnam Thirumurivu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search except film database sites and youtube videos. Tagged for notability for 9 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devasura

The article Devasura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, tagged since 2010. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lament (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lament (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lament (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Man Standing Next

Hello, Sunuraju. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Man Standing Next".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop posting bare URLs as references

I have just looked through your 20 most recent edits to Wikipedia, the ones you have made in December. 12 of these edits were additions such as this one of a bare, unexplained URL in reference tags. Looking back further at random edits from your contributions history, it looks like the majority of your edits for at least several months have been of this kind. A URL is not a source, and on its own it does not tell the reader anything about what the actual source is. The citation/reference must include information about the title, author, publication, and date (at least), and those things are more important than the URL. A new editor is given a lot of latitude in things like this, but you have been around for years, and other editors have asked you before to cite the sources properly, for instance in 2016, 2017, and 2018 (with some advice on good tools to use).

Please stop doing this. If you want help with citing sources properly, ask at the Teahouse or Help desk. Also do consider whether a short sentence that already has a source really needs several more sources stating the same thing (e.g. 1, 2). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 12:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Despite repeated requests to stop adding bare URLs as references, you have continued doing it. These edits were made after my post above: [1], [2], [3]. bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

reFill

Have you considered trying the reFill tool? All you have to do is paste the title of the article into https://refill.toolforge.org/ and it fills the bare refs for you. I've used it before and it's very easy. Sro23 (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Thalastaanam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thalastaanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalastaanam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mood of the Day

The article Mood of the Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bombay Dada

The article Bombay Dada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Praja

The article Praja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anuragada Alegalu

The article Anuragada Alegalu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greetings (2004 film)

The article Greetings (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Praja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Praja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum

The article Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Globe Award for Best Foreign Language Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you please elaborate on your removal please?!?

Hello, since you didn't give your explanation in the edit summary on the constant removal ¹² of the supposed drama Sarang from the "See also" parameter of the TV infobox for Rina, could you please explain to me by replying to this section on what justifies your decisions? Then I wouldn't have to keep reverting, which puts my account at risk of being blocked. —beetricks ~ 💬 · ✉️ 16:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Churam

The article Churam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Onnaman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onnaman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onnaman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Powerful Karma (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Vellinakshatram (2004 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vellinakshatram (2004 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vellinakshatram (2004 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Powerful Karma (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Citation

On December 7, 2019, you added a citation in the article on Ian Ziering. In adding the citation, you provided only a website link. Please research the proper manner in which citations are written and follow that style. I corrected the one in question and was happy to do so. God bless and happy editing! MarydaleEd (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kang Hye-won

A tag has been placed on Kang Hye-won requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

"Kang Hye-won" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kang Hye-won. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 22#Kang Hye-won until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Chinese film remakes has been nominated for discussion

Category:Chinese film remakes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thirumanassu

The article Thirumanassu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article does not provide any reference of being a notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gruhapravesha

The article Gruhapravesha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFILM. no reliable sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chitrashalabham

The article Chitrashalabham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFILM. no reliable sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Darshan (2004 film)

The article Darshan (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources/reviews. Article depends on one unreliable source per Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 01:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Darshan (2004 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darshan (2004 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chakkaramuthu

The article Chakkaramuthu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Johnny Kitagawa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Johnny Kitagawa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Pacto de sangre (Mexican TV series), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, I'm Skipple. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nancy Mace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Skipple ☎ 14:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The Zone of Interest (film), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Hi, just wanted to let you know that you broke the table formatting in The Zone of Interest (film) by improperly inserting a (mostly empty) row. Please check that before publishing edits and ideally please also add rows fully and properly not just as an unfinished placeholder. ChromeGames (talk · contribs) 17:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Civil War (2024 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mike Allen 17:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Good work

Well done, Sunni Paiya. Your contributions on [[Jigarthanda DoubleX]] has really enriched that article 24thHusbandofDraupathi (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Lee Sun-kyun

On 31 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lee Sun-kyun, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 02:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Vijayakanth

On 31 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Vijayakanth, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 04:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chamayam (1993 film)

The article Chamayam (1993 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find substantial sources (so not cursory mentions from The Hindu) to endorse this film's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Longhornsg (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Longhornsg. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mia Schem, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. [4] [5] Longhornsg (talk) 05:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'm EmilySarah99. Your recent edit(s) to the page Princess Isabella of Denmark appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Her father is first, her brother is second, she is third. Although it is the 14th of January, the queen is not set to abdicate until 2pm local time. This change should be made then. EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Vincent of Denmark. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Just Stop Oil. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. The Mona Lisa protest was by Riposte Alimentaire, not Just Stop Oil. Belbury (talk) 09:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suchana Seth

The article Suchana Seth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Not News. Subject is not notable enough to warrant an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Suchana Seth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suchana Seth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suchana Seth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello, I just want to mention that edit summaries are really helpful to other editors. I notice you rarely use them. Could you consider adding edit summaries to your edits? Thank you! Masterhatch (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

An Ordinary Case moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to An Ordinary Case. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and has not been shown by a source to have entered production per WP:NFF. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 12:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Stub articles

Hi Sunuraju. I really admire your interest in building the encyclopedia. But I am not sure what utility these is to the stub articles you are creating. If you are not interested in developing a full profile of these films then perhaps it would best to leave another user to create them. Because the stubs honestly feel more like you're spamming them out. And, I hope I am not being impolite, but some of the phrasing and innaccuracies are worrying. I wish I could cleanup every one of these stubs but I don't have the time to familiarise myself with each film enough to provide an accurate and full representation. Again, I mean no offense and I'm not trying to tell you what to do. Just something to consider. Οἶδα (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

ok Sunuraju (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bastar: The Naxal Story

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bastar: The Naxal Story, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Murder of Fawziyah Javed

Hello Sunuraju, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Murder of Fawziyah Javed, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Fawziyah Javed.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 10:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

42nd Hong Kong Film Awards

Hi Sunuraju, I appreciate your updates on the 42nd Hong Kong Film Awards. However, please ensure that when updating an awards ceremony, you not only change "pending" to "won", but also update the losing categories to "nom", while providing sources for verification and updating the biography section. Otherwise, other users will have to clean it up, and it would be better to have a fully completed update rather than leaving it halfway done for someone else to finish. Thanks again for your contributions and have a great day! —— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabriel de Leon

The article Gabriel de Leon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 22:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of An Ordinary Case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article An Ordinary Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Ordinary Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop

Please do not add citations to sentences that are not supported by the sources. It degrades the text–source integrity and verifiability of the article. If you plan to add a statement supported by a source, cite the source in the same edit as the addition of the statement, not before it. Nardog (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Here, you added this source to the sentence In October 2022, Emanuel urged several businesses to stop working with rapper Kanye West over his antisemitic comments. It says nothing about October 2022 or Kanye West. Here, you added this source to the sentence However, for unknown reasons, the film will not be shown theatrically in Canada. It says nothing about Canada.

Why are you doing this? Please stop it immediately because you're making the encyclopedia worse. Nardog (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

This source you added makes no mention of Macy's. Enough is enough. Nardog (talk) 05:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

For the umpteenth time, I remind you to observe WP:INTEGRITY. Nardog (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sunuraju. Thank you for your work on Kid Snow. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A forthcoming film with industry recognition (Sydney Film Festival) and coverage in other sources. I note that several of the references are incomplete, missing authors (important to recognize their work) and publication dates (important for context); is would be helpful to expand these. It's been marked as a stub, and no doubt there will be more to say as the film is released.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Grammar, punctuation, and sourcing

Hello, I notice that you state on your user page that you have "grammar problems". What this suggests is that you should take exceptional care when editing. I've reviewed a number of your recent edits, and they frequently lack proper punctuation or ignore existing punctuation. You also recently added a third source to a sentence that already had two valid sources. It is not necessary to add citations to material that is already clearly and appropriately cited; it only makes the task of reading the article harder for the general readership of the encyclopedia. Please don't add sources to already sourced material, unless the claims are extraordinary and have been challenged by other editors. Please use the 'Preview' button to review your edits before publishing them. Please be mindful while editing to take into account the existing grammar and punctuation of the text surrounding your edits. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucija Begić

The article Lucija Begić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, any notability should be covered by Miss Croatia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sciencefish (talk) 10:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Again, punctuation

With this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dance_of_Flags&diff=prev&oldid=1227744244 You added a sentence to the article, but did not end the sentence with a period. This is a near constant occurence. Always put a period or "dot" at the end of a sentence. Also, when adding references, there should be no space after the punctuation and the start of the reference, and as well, when you add an additional reference, there should not be a space between the two references. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 23:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Anouk Aimée

On 22 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anouk Aimée, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 11:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Please remove non-existent template

The non-existent template "Vinayan" has been added to more than thirty articles. Please self-revert these additions. If the template is ever created, then add it; pushing a redlinked template into live article space isn't appropriate. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 17:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Please follow the manual of style for adding citations to articles

Please review WP:MOS#Punctuation_and_footnotes, specifically

Ref tags (<ref>...</ref>) are used to create footnotes (sometimes called endnotes or just notes), as citation footnotes and sometimes explanatory notes. All ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies, with no intervening space. Refs are placed after adjacent punctuation, not before (apart from the exceptions below). Adjacent ref tags should have no space between them, nor should there be any between ref tags and inline dispute/cleanup templates.. Thank you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you recently removed content from Desperate Lies without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop inserting spaces that are not appropriate per the Manual of Style

I'm practically begging you at this point. I've tried repeatedly to get you to conform your edits to standard. Virtually every time you add a reference to an article, you either add a space between the end of a sentence and the reference, or a space between consecutive references. This means that for virtually all such edits, another editor has to clean up your error. As I quoted above from the Manual of Style, there is a standard in place here. You can look at almost any article on Wikipedia, and if there are references, there is NO space between the end of a sentence and a reference, or between consecutive references. Please. This should not be difficult to conform to.

This is correct:

• "something something.<ref>"

This is NOT correct:

• "something something. <ref>"

This is correct:

• "<ref> an existing reference</ref><ref> a new reference</ref>"

This is NOT correct:

• "<ref> an existing reference</ref> <ref> a new reference</ref>"

I have asked you to conform to this standard several times. Please adjust your editing behavior. Thank you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 23:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I see you've done a number of edits today, all of them conforming to the Manual of Style standard regarding references. Thank you very much for doing so. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Next 'lesson'

Thank you again for your efforts in inserting references correctly, really appreciate it. I noticed though that you continue to fail to capitalize the first letter of a new sentence you create, and often leave off the final "period. Here's an example:

This is NOT correct:

• "this is a sentence"

This IS correct:

• "This is a sentence."

Please try to keep that in mind when editing. First letter of a sentence should always be uppercase, always end a sentence with a 'dot'. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aché Abrahams

The article Aché Abrahams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unless we're going to cite her YouTube channel or unless her 50k Instagram "Followers" count towards notability I don't think Wikipedia needs a page of someone who came fourth in a beauty pageant somewhere

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanes tree (talk) 17:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Murder of Alexia Daval moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Murder of Alexia Daval. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not all murders pass WP:GNG, and wikipedia is not a directory of murders. You need to show that this is a notable murder.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Murder of Alexia Daval has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Murder of Alexia Daval. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and apply what you learn there to the draft. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Prakash Alex moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prakash Alex. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and fails to meet the minimum inline citation requirements for a bio of a living person. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 12:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Shanto Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shanto Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It may be appropriate as an article about the deaths, but not as a biography. It needs to be rewritten to handle that. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Shanto Khan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shanto Khan. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Adam Supyk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Adam Supyk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Moves from Draft Space to Article Space

You have recently moved a large number of drafts on association football players to article space. While this is permitted, it requires cleanup. If you plan to continue moving drafts to article space, you might consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer, in which case you will have the script that you need to make the moves properly. It might also be useful to take part in discussions about what pages are likely to survive an AFD discussion, because I see that you have also had several articles moved from article space to draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I was just about to write a message about the exact same thing. Sunuraju, please also keep in mind that your account has the autopatrolled flag, meaning your articles bypass new pages patrol — you thus have a heightened responsibility to make sure your moves are ready for mainspace, including meeting relevant notability criteria and BLP requirements. Let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Phil Collins, you may be blocked from editing. As you have had multiple notifications and warnings surrounding unreferenced additions to articles in the past, I am posting this as an elevated warning. Continued editing in this manner will result in administrative escalation which could result in account sanctions. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 13:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Mika Stojsavljevic, you may be blocked from editing.
You have been warned informally twice already for disruptive moves from Draft to Mainspace. This is a formal warning. Continuing in this manner will result in a block (0.975 probability) 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shaheen Siddique, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topics alert

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Mellk (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

"The Beast Must Die ( TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Beast Must Die ( TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § The Beast Must Die ( TV series) until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Housefull 4, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Anjootambalam Veerarkavu fire moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anjootambalam Veerarkavu fire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Please correct WP:CITEKILL and also WP:NOTNEWS.I s this actually worthy of an article?. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Anjootambalam Veerarkavu fire has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anjootambalam Veerarkavu fire. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Ariel Han moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ariel Han. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Chung Gyu-ri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chung Gyu-ri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Noor Xarmina moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Noor Xarmina. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

I recommend you submit it for review. However, if you unilaterally move it back to the main namespace, I will have no choice but to take it to AFD. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello Sunuraju. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Noor Xarmina, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sunuraju. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sunuraju|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Saqib,

I want to clarify that I am in no way being paid or receiving any compensation for my edits on Wikipedia, nor do I have any interest in doing so. I am here solely out of personal interest and passion for contributing to Wikipedia, with no intent or desire to receive any form of payment or compensation.

Thank you for reaching out.

Best regards,

Sunuraju Sunuraju (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm not convinced because you are repeatedly recreating articles on topics that were previously created by UPE. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

There is a 76% probability that you have used a large language model to generate this rely. This invalidates it. We do not wish to hear what AI has to say. We require an answer from you, Sunuraju, personally 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Hello Sunuraju. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sunuraju. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sunuraju|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I'd like you to clarify what prompted you to write an article on a topic that was deleted just yesterday after being identified as created by a UPE sock farm Nauman335, especially considering that this topic has been created multiple times by the same sock farm? Please avoid giving a generic response about personal interest or passion for contributing to Wikipedia. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Salman Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Reference clearly falls under NEWSORGINDIA CNMall41 (talk) 03:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Avoid adding WP:OR to BLPs.

Your recent edit(s) to Nargis (Pakistani actress) has been reverted due to the inclusion of original research, which violates Wikipedia's policies. Please refrain from adding original research to articles in the future and ensure that all contributions are supported by reliable sources. This helps ensure the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia content. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Also, please stop renaming the section. The current title makes much more sense. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I suggest you submit this through AFC. There’s no harm in trying for an AFC review. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Belindé Schreuder moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Belindé Schreuder. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Ariel Han moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ariel Han. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Sofia Cajo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sofia Cajo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Gauri Gothankar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gauri Gothankar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Rashmi Shinde moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rashmi Shinde. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Joemon Jyothir moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Joemon Jyothir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Victor Meutelet moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Victor Meutelet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Vassili Schneider moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vassili Schneider. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noor Xarmina (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Saqib were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noor Xarmina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Sunuraju! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Pakistani television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Pakistani television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Pakistani television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Pakistani television series endings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azaad (upcoming film) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azaad (upcoming film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju. I hope to see your response on the SPI. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vassili Schneider has been accepted

Vassili Schneider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lewisguile (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission Draft:Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum at Articles for creation has been accepted

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Faymas (talk) 19:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashmi Shinde (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rashmi Shinde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sofia Cajo (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sofia Cajo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 06:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hi - can you explain to me what you meant when you made this comment? Girth Summit _(blether) 15:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

i thought add draft for green tv series and i didn't know there was sockpuppert farm created draft of gentleman and other dramas. secondly i am not one one of sockpupperts, i joined Wikipedia in 2010 Sunuraju (talk) 02:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but why are you - an editor with 14 years' tenure, 20k edits, and the autopatrolled permission - going to the talk page of a week-old sockpuppet, asking how to add a draft. I'd like you to explain why you went to that account's talk page, and asked that question, if you can. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pavithra Gowda

Hello, Sunuraju. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pavithra Gowda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

delete it Sunuraju (talk) 06:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noor Xarmina (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noor Xarmina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello Sunuraju. This is just to let you know that I've removed the autopatrolled flag from your account: because a number of your articles this year have been deleted, sent to draftspace, and/or declined (in addition to various other warnings), I think it would be best for them to go through the usual new page patrol process for the time being. This has no effect on you—all it means is that when you create a new article, someone else will look at it to make sure it's all right. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Saqib

Hello, Sunuraju,

I think you need to stop asking about Saqib. I was shocked the other day when I saw he was blocked. I worked with him on many AFDs and we had exchanged email messages earlier this year. That's why I posted to PrimeFac's User talk page to ask, even though I knew that, as an ARBCOM block, that I wouldn't get any answers because it was based on private information. As with Checkuser information, there is just some information that is kept private on this project and it doesn't matter who we asked, we'll never get a reply that satisfies us. It's how things are.

I'm hoping that one day, Saqib appeals his block to ARBCOM and this appeal is heard by the committee. But until that day happens, we just have to continue on our work, accepting that we won't know all of the details. Good luck with your work. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

tell him i will waiting if he was unblock or not? Sunuraju (talk) 03:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Noor Jahan (2024 TV series) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Noor Jahan (2024 TV series). Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noor Jahan (2024 TV series) has been accepted

Noor Jahan (2024 TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 09:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)