LICA98

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LICA98. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FairyTailRocks 03:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2014–15 La Liga, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Russian Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Syomin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Faroe Islands

Hi, just curious were you find result of 2015 Faroe Islands Premier League. I cant find it at [1] or soccerway. Qed237 (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Here [2] LICA98 (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Romanian Football

Can you help improving Romanian football ? teams, seasons, red links ?--Alexiulian25 (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I usually only do tables and scores, so probably no for teams or red links... LICA98 (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

You can help improving Liga II seasons then, each edition needs a table, with the football results, I did the main page, is still incomplete and I need the every season result to can see exactly who promoted or not, to can add in the table. We also edit currently Cupa Romaniei seasons. Thank you for cooperation !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Finnish League Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diogo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Finnish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timothy Adams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Finnish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Just for thanks

Thanks very much for your helping. Please use this site to ad stadiums in Russian Cup 2016-2017, http://www.championat.com/ Thanks, Ionel141 (Ionel141) 12:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Russian Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armavir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Coppa Italia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jeda and Adama Diakité. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Russian Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Bulgarian Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atanas Atanasov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Request for creating needed pages

Would I like to request for created needed pages such as: 2016–17 Belgian Cup, 2016–17 Magyar Kupa, 2016–17 Bosnia and Herzegovina Football Cup and 2016–17 Albanian Cup because are necessary. --37.248.154.26 (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LICA98. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your edits to 2016-17 Coupe de France

Hi, I have reverted your edits today to the above page. Unfortunately you have gone against current consensus by reordering the fixtures by date rather than maintaining the order of the draw. Note there is already an open discussion on this on the talk page, so no need to open a fresh one.

Unfortunately, a couple of elements you added appear to have been lost by doing this - I will endeavor to reinstate these, or you may do so yourself. Thanks and Regards, Gricehead (talk) 13:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to 2017-18 Europa League

I reverted your changes related to cup winners in Croatia, Italy and Portugal. It is true that cup winner has priority compared to other league entrants. However, Cup final will not influence on distribution berths in mentioned countries. In Croatia Dinamo and Rijeka will take first two places. Therefore, 2nd placed team is going to ELQ3 regardless will they win in cup final or not. Similarly, in Italy. Juve has already secured CL, while cup final opponent can be at worst 5th. In each case, 4th and 5th placed are going to ELGS, while 6th placed team qualifies for ELQ3. Similarly in Portugal. Benfica already qualfied for CL, while Vitoria cannot be worse than 4th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mijo34 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

but if Dinamo wins cup and finishes 2nd we will put them as CW and not as 2nd, that's why we have to have CW/2nd for now (look at last season for example, Maribor and Partizan are both CW and 2nd but are put as CW) LICA98 (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

In such case, after the end of the season write CW or 2nd to the brackets. For now, we are not sure will CW play in certain round, but we are 100% sure that 2nd placed team will play that round. It is the minor problem to write Dinamo(CW) or Dinamo(2nd) at the end. Similarly, for Real Madrid who qualified for CL GS. We wrote 1st/2nd, because those are potential ending positions of Real in La Liga. Nobody wrote 1st/2nd/TH despite the fact they will play in the final against Juve. If they win the final, then the note will be changed to Real Madrid(TH). Similarly, after today Arsenal win it is obvious that 5th and 6th team of English PL will compete in EL GS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.157.24 (talk) 23:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

2017 Latvian Football Cup

I went back and looked at putting teams in order of draw or order by date. I thought I had read consensus somewhere but I can't find that now. When I'm not sure about something like this, I will usually look at the bigger football nations in Europe to see the what is done there because they are normally edited similarly and according to consensus. I found that there is difference in these, and since it doesn't matter to me, I have no interest in reordering the Latvian Cup.

However, there is consensus that the best way to format cup competitions is with Football box & Football box collapsible. This is probably the best explanation of the guidelines, but it exists other places as well. I am considering making the change in this article if I think I am willing to do the work. Basically, an editor should not switch the format to the boxes if they are not willing to fill in the information. If you think you want to do it, go for it. I'm not sure yet. Thanks. Equineducklings (talk) 00:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

I think that for "small" countries like Latvia the table format works better (because most teams and players don't have a wiki page and also there is sometimes little information available) but I don't object if you change it to football box and then put it according to draw order (because date is visible)

in the table format if you put it in draw order there is no way to find out the date LICA98 (talk) 04:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

I never disagreed that in order of date may be better for the table format, but I thought that it was supposed to be the other way. Once I looked and couldn't find that consensus anywhere, I was fine with keeping it the way it is. I'm still not sure about changing to football box, because it's more work, but also because sometimes all the information is not available. I have never liked the green highlight for the winner, but that's just personal preference (and I try not to change based on preference). Overall, I think the article looks good so far. Thanks. Equineducklings (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Comparison of European road signs

You changed "End of maximum speed limit and overtaking prohibition" to "End of all restriction". The reason why I didn't do that was that I wasn't sure that it means that in all of the countries (it sure does in some of them). If you are sure of what you are doing, then it's fine with me, but in case of doubt, I consider my version more adequate (because the signs cover at least those two restrictions). Sigur (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I think it's better to write "end of all restrictions" than just listing 2 that it ends (because that makes it look like it only ends those 2 and nothing else) LICA98 (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LICA98. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

template:2017–18_Eredivisie_table

Why you keep adding the Q status for PSV? Last column of the table already indicates they are qualified, it even indicates what they're qualified for. And it's "loss points" and not "lost points" just like it's "your loss" and not "your lost". Or do we need to send out a rescue party to find those lost points? --Sb008 (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

the last column indicates that the first place qualifies for CL3QR however it doesn't necessarily mean that the team currently in first place has qualified to CL, for example after the first round Vitesse was in first place so according to your logic they were qualified to CL? that's why we need to add Q to indicate that the team has qualified for the competition

https://writingexplained.org/loss-vs-lost-difference loss: noun lost: adjective

so it's "lost points" the same way as "lost match" or "lost competition" LICA98 (talk) 20:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

If the team in first place is indicated as champion, it does mean, as you state yourself, they are qualified for CL3QR. Exactly why Vitesse, after the first round, did not have the C status. Or do you think, PSV as champion, can still become 2nd? The official Dutch league rules, which are leading, define the 2nd criteria as a noun (verliespunten) and not as an adjective (verloren punten) [3]. So loss points. --Sb008 (talk) 09:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

not necessarily because a team can be champion and not qualify for European competition

in English we say "lost points" not "loss points" (or a better way would be "less points lost") LICA98 (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please provide me a single example of a team being champion not qualifying for a European competition. You can call it won/lost statistics, won/lost points and won/lost ratio. Most call it win/loss statistics, win/loss points and win/loss ratio. Now stop vandalizing. --Sb008 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

for example Skënderbeu 2 years ago (and this year probably)

most? nobody says "loss points", it's either lost points or points lost LICA98 (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, maybe that's why the "Qualification or relegation" column behind Skënderbeu is empty. Also I see no Q status behind the teams which ended at rank 2-4. For all teams (rank 1-4) it's very clear what they did or didn't qualify for, without using a Q status. Same applies to PSV, if they hadn't qualified for CL3QR, the "Qualification or relegation" column had been empty. And it's certainly not lost points just like it isn't lost statistics. "Points lost", or even better, "less points lost" or "lesser points lost", is acceptable. --Sb008 (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

that's because Q statuses are removed after the season

either way it's not "loss points", that doesn't make sense in English LICA98 (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:2017–18 Eredivisie table. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BangJan1999 11:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Direction

Discuss the merit of whatever argument you're trying to make on the talk page of the template. Enigma^msg 00:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Poltava

This one specifically - /lt/ isn't a valid syllable onset in either Ukrainian or Russian. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Also, remember that the hard allophone of Russian /a/ is transcribed as [a] (see [4] and [5]). Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Last thing (I hope): don't forget that Russian transcriptions need to be enclosed within the IPA-ru template, not the IPA-uk one. This is important because if they aren't, they'll link to Help:IPA/Ukrainian instead of Help:IPA/Russian, which is considerably less helpful. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

sorry about that, in my font a and ɑ look identical so I didn't see a difference LICA98 (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

No problem. If you'd like to fix that, copy my common.css (to User:LICA98/common.css) and download the DejaVu Sans font. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

/mtɕ/ also isn't a valid onset. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

so мчаться isn't a word then? LICA98 (talk) 21:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

@LICA98: It clearly has an unusual onset, regardless of whether it's a loanword or something else. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 23:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

so? it's a valid onset if words start with it? LICA98 (talk) 04:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LICA98. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank for your edits! Victor Grigas (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–2023 Russian mystery fires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirov. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Russian mystery fires (2022–present) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian mystery fires (2022–present), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian mystery fires (2022–present) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Nasal release

Hi. The Wiktionary entry is auto-generated, and in any case is not a RS. The IPA even gives Russian as an example of nasal release. — kwami (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)