Hi, thanks for making a change in the "ellipsis" section at WP:MOS. On WT:MOS#Stability and WP:CONSENSUS, we've just started talking again about how to figure out which changes have "consensus", and I pointed to your edit as an example of something that might not have consensus. In fact, the point is that there wasn't anything terribly wrong with your edit, but that's not the point; there's a message at the top of every guideline and policy page that says "make sure your edit reflects consensus"...that is, not just a good idea, but something Wikipedians believe already. Please feel free to join in the discussion. This wasn't aimed at you personally, of course, I don't believe we've met. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your change has a few problems with wording; but of course it reflects English usage.WP:MOS has a long history of reflecting the prejudices of a handful of editors who wish to revise the English language; this is a long-standing dispute which you have been unfortunate enough to step in the middle of. Please don't take this personally, and enjoy editing Wikipedia. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- thanks betswiki (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- thanks betswiki (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the cleanup. If you have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. Viriditas (talk) 22:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Trying to learn protocol and style for Wikipedia - daunting . . . but i am a copyeditor, so ask me anything, if it has to do with grammar, punctuation and so forth. I thought the article on the temple was pretty good. I am trying to think of more things, but really haven't come up with anything. (Mormon people say that area is the most beautiful in all the islands, the setting. I dunno if that's a stretch . . . but maybe there is a way to bring up something about that. And maybe other people think that too.) Most of my thoughts had to do with copyediting issues, which quickly become complicated as one deals with the church's style guides and the style guides of the rest of the world. Betswiki (talk) 02:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll look into finding more information about the natural beauty; that's a great idea. Could you take a look at the folklore section and comment on whether my use of the terms "divine protection" and "divine providence" are accurate descriptions? I'm not a member of the LDS Church, and my knowledge of the subject is limited. Viriditas (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
yep - been outta town . . .Betswiki (talk) 06:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Hi Viriditas - the folklore section looks ok to me - have not heard of these stories, but they sound like typical 'faith-promoting' tales common in the LDS culture - the terms 'divine protection' and 'divine providence' might not themselves be heard in an LDS storytelling environment, but i do not see them as being in any way inappropriate or offensive to anyone either within it or outside it - forge onward! - b Betswiki (talk) 06:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- Good edits, but I don't agree with changing "Temples" to "They". BTW, there seems to be some kind of conflict between you and another editor who keeps changing your edits. You may want to use the talk page. Viriditas (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
i understand - but changed to they because i changed the preceding sentence adding 'temples' again due to something that seemed to need referral . . . i forget now - i am sure it can be looked at - we then had too many 'temples' too close together . . . these things happen - change it back if you want - far's i'm concerned it's your piece - am just trying to help if i can - if it ain't help, then undo it . . . i won't be offended - in fact i won't remember! :) bBetswiki (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Nah, you're doing fine. It's certainly not my article. The more, the merrier... :) Viriditas (talk) 04:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
oh yeah - i didn't want people to think 'people' were not used for regular Sunday worship instead of temples! so i changed a word or two . . . for one thing, i think there was a singular/plural problem . . . so it's a little different and 'they' went in - if it gets changed back, it won't put me into depression - b Betswiki (talk) 04:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey! GA status! Congrats, Viriditas! betswiki (talk) 00:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've got a list of open tasks if you're interested. Lā'ie, Hawai'i and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Hawaii could use your tender love and care. Thanks again. Viriditas (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Viriditas - might keep me outta trouble - will have a look and brush up TLC skills! - b betswiki (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Are there any particular topics that interest you? I'm basically looking for editors who can help (like you have with Laie Hawaii Temple) with Hawaii-related topics. I see you have an interest in cuisine. I'm actually looking for collaborators to help out with particular Hawaii-related cuisine articles. Let me know if you would like more information. Viriditas (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
hmmmm - cuisine kinda hit me in the face is all (i looked up a friend, Chris Cosentino . . . rest just grew like Topsy!)(mtn biking came from that too) - LDS stuff and HI stuff - Eastern Canada (lived there) - the Wild West, where i grew up . . . everything interests me is the trouble! my areas of study: technical copyediting, biochem/medical, DNA, genealogy (a hobby) - i'm awfully eclectic! - and i have 5 kids . . . makes me more eclectic! bbetswiki (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cool. Have you ever made a request at User:SuggestBot/Requests? That would help. Viriditas (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cuisine of the Western United States
edit
A tag has been placed on Cuisine of the Western United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
== WikiProject Cycling was formed some years ago as a central point for discussion. If you need any extra help, don't hesitate to ask me. Cheers, SeveroTC 12:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
ok - thanks - b betswiki (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have merged your article with Barbecue in the United States#Texas where it fits quite nicely. If you wish to make further edits, that would be the place to go. Regards, WWGB (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC) mucho gratitude - just can't say too much about BBQ! b betswiki (talk) 06:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
edit
|
As you have shown an interest in Cuisine of the Maritime Provinces (Canada) you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Prince Edward Island Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 02:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Logical Quotations
editI appreciate you taking the effort to make a needed copyedit on Same-sex marriage in California. However, I noticed that a number of your edits went against the Wikipedia logical quotation style, where punctuation not actually being quoted does not go between the quotation marks. I realize that this may be a fair bit of a switch from what is commonly practiced elsewhere, where one might put "boo," just like that, instead of putting "boo", as we do, with the comma outside the quotation marks. There are practical reasons for this in a reference work of this sort. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
capital degree name
editWhy have you switched them all to lower-case? Do you have a reference for this style. At the very least it clashes with the capitalized abbreviations and linked articles so a strong reference would be necessary. Rmhermen (talk) 04:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Show me a reason to put them up instead of down. It's wrong, wrong, wrong, and it is massively done. ("George Washington, PhD or BA or MS," or whatever is correct--but it is not correct correct to capitalize the words when they are not reduced to initials).
"Bachelor of Arts George Washington" would be correct (the degree would be title), just as "President Washington" is correct. However, "George Washington was elected president," is correct (while it would be incorrect to capitalize "president" used thus).
I grant you that this is incorrectly done about 99% of the time and that you are going to find these degrees capitalized everywhere you look. However, see Chicago Manual of Style, 13th ed., page 192, section 7.26 under "Academic Degrees and Honors"; it will tell you that the words (a degree) are capitalized when they follow a personal name (as i said above, as in "John Jones, Ph.D.") whether spelled out or abbreviated. "But when academic degrees are referred to in such general terms as doctorate, doctor's, bachelor's, master of science, they are not capitalized."
Much confusion is generated because we have so many words, these days, reduced to a series of initial letters, always uppercase. People see these and think that the words should then be capitalized when the expression is spelled out. Wrong, wrong, wrong! betswiki (talk) 06:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Betswiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Betswiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Betswiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)