This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Due to Clinton's use of the term as presumptive Secretary of State I've tagged the article as relevant to WP:OBAMA, but I've left the importance as Low for now.
I've rated this article as C-class - it still needs considerable elaboration, including summary descriptions of "hard" and "soft" power in WP:summary style, a better idea of who is promoting the term, and a broader global perspective. It is too soon to ask for the article to be comprehensive, but I find sources such as a book "Soft Power"[1] associated with the Cato Institute, and application of the term to other countries such as Turkey,[2] which suggest that a broader focus is needed. Mike Serfas (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
