[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Chapin School

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Disambig?

edit

this needs a disambig page, as there are at least three Chapin Schools. Manhattan, Princeton, and one in Connecticut somewhere, all three are independent and unrelated.ThuranX 15:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapin School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Listing non-religions such as "None" in the religion entries of infoboxes

edit

There have been several RfCs on whether to list non-religions such as "None" in the religion entries (religion, denomination, religious affilliaton, etc.) of infoboxes:

Religion in the infobox

edit

There have been several RfCs on religion in the infobox:

This RfC had a clear consensus for removing the religion parameter from the infobox for individuals (living, deceased, and fictional), groups, schools, institutions, and political parties that have no religion, but that RfC was determined by the closing administrator to not apply to nations.

This RfC had a clear consensus for removing the religion parameter for countries, nations, states, regions, etc., all of which were determined to not have religions.

This RfC was a response to certain individuals insisting that the previous RfCs did not apply to their favorite pages (schools, political parties, sports teams, computer operating systems, organized crime gangs...) and had a clear consensus that in all infoboxes in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the "Religion=" parameter of the infobox.

In this RfC, there was a clear consensus to remove the "religion=" and "denomination=" parameters from all biographical infoboxes, not just the ones that call atheism/agnosticism a religion.

There have been four RfCs on this, and all four showed the same overwhelming consensus. All of the RfCs also concluded that you are free to put a section about religion in the body of the article, subject of course to our usual rules such as WP:V, WP:RS and WP:WEIGHT. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you really put a warning on my talk page about my one revert of this one particular thing? That's not an "edit war": that's the sort of thing you could have very easily pointed out directly on my talk page: "Hey, did you know there have been RFCs on this thing?" Esrever (klaT) 23:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I owe you an apology. Please see the page history at Academy for Global Exploration and Chapin School to see where I became confused. (not an excuse, just an explanation). I have stricken the my comments on your talk page. Feel free to delete them. Sorry for the error. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
We all make mistakes. I appreciate you owning up to yours. Esrever (klaT) 00:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapin School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply