Talk:Asbestos cement

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Buildings What. Peer reviewers: Kalkot.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Merge into Fiber cement

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I do not see any reason why a brand name (such as Eternit or Fibro) should receive a special page. --Zeamays (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

It would be wrong to merge it with Fiber cement, as (from that page): "Fibre cement products came about as a replacement for the widely used 'Asbestos Cement Sheeting' product manufactured by James Hardie until the late 1980s". And Asbestos Cement Sheeting is written as a synonym for Fibro, so apparently Fibre cement products is different from Fibro.Aarghdvaark (talk) 07:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rename as Asbestos cement

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fibro → Asbestos cement – The article is about any asbestos cement not just Fibro. The generic name is preferable to a brand name. Joja lozzo 03:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Joja lozzo 03:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom, and because "fibro" is most often used as an abbreviation of fibromyalgia. I encounter that usage literally several times per week in the blogsphere and social media (I'm not making a WP:IDONTKNOWIT argument against the cement brand; rather I'm adding an observation of known ambiguity, to the already-sufficient "this article isn't about the brand" rationale). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 02:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asbestos cement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

New citations

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Asbestos cement enthusiasts,

I am considering adding five new citations to the page Asbestos cement.

^[1] This source will expand the article's depth of the material itself- its water absorption, density and porosity, stability, and strength.

^[2] This source will be useful to expand how asbestos cement is made, and why asbestos makes for a durable fibre.

^[3] This source is more case-specific about how asbestos cement holds up against fire. This could be an important example of asbestos cement in conditions other than rain and runoff, as is mentioned currently in the article.

^[4] This source lays out the common places asbestos cement is found. This is briefly mentioned on the current article page, but with no citations.

^[5] The article briefly mentions the cleaning of asbestos cement and the potential health dangers of doing so. This article would be a great way to expand upon current health risks for those who already have asbestos cement in their homes or workplaces and are considering what to do next.

Please provide any feedback or additional new sources or ideas to expand this great page.

Buildings What (talk) 03:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Fishburn, Cyrus C. "Physical Properties of Some Samples of Asbestos-cement Siding." U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Building Materials and Structures Report 122: Washington, D.C. (July 5, 1951).
^ McLaughlin, Robert W. and Henry A. Jandl. "Asbestos Cement: A Basic Building Material." Princeton University School of Architecture. Princeton, New Jersey, (1959).
^ Mitchell, Nolan D. "Fire Tests of Wood-Framed Walls and Partitions With Asbestos-Cement Facings." U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Building Materials and Structures Report 123: Washington, D.C. (May 10, 1951).
^ http://www.hse.gov.uk/asbestos/essentials/cement.htm
^ https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/53/6/627/175330

Add topic

[1] Fishburn, Cyrus C. "Physical Properties of Some Samples of Asbestos-cement Siding." U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Building Materials and Structures Report 122: Washington, D.C. (July 5, 1951).

[2] McLaughlin, Robert W. and Henry A. Jandl. "Asbestos Cement: A Basic Building Material." Princeton University School of Architecture. Princeton, New Jersey, (1959).

[3] Mitchell, Nolan D. "Fire Tests of Wood-Framed Walls and Partitions With Asbestos-Cement Facings." U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Building Materials and Structures Report 123: Washington, D.C. (May 10, 1951).

[4] ttp://www.hse.gov.uk/asbestos/essentials/cement.htm

[5] ttps://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/53/6/627/175330

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]