Colubridae (/kəˈluːbrɪdiː/, commonly known as colubrids /ˈkɒljʊbrɪdz/, from Latin: coluber, 'snake') is a family of snakes. With 249 genera,[2] it is the largest snake family. The earliest fossil species of the family date back to the Late Eocene epoch, with earlier origins suspected.[1] Colubrid snakes are found on every continent except Antarctica.[3]
Colubridae Temporal range: [1]
| |
---|---|
Colubridae species | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Order: | Squamata |
Suborder: | Serpentes |
Superfamily: | Colubroidea |
Family: | Colubridae Oppel, 1811 |
Description
editColubrids are a very diverse group of snakes. They can exhibit many different body styles, body sizes, colors, and patterns. They can also live in many different types of habitats including aquatic, terrestrial, semi-arboreal, arboreal, desert, mountainous forests, semi-fossorial, and brackish waters.[4]: 622–623 A primarily shy and harmless group of snakes, the vast majority of colubrids are not venomous, nor do most colubrids produce venom that is medically significant to mammals. However, the bites of a few groups (such as Boiga sp.) can escalate quickly to emergency situations. Furthermore, within the Colubridae, the South African boomslang and twig snakes, as well as the Asian keelback snakes (Rhabdophis sp.) have long been notorious for inflicting the worst bites on humans, with the most confirmed fatalities.[3][5][6]
Some colubrids are described as opisthoglyphous (often simply called "rear-fanged"), meaning they possess shortened, grooved "fangs" located at the back of the upper jaw. It is thought that opisthoglyphy evolved many times throughout the natural history of squamates[5] and is an evolutionary precursor to the larger, frontal fangs of vipers and elapids.[7][8][9][3][5] These grooved fangs tend to be sharpest on the anterior and posterior edges.[10] While feeding, colubrids move their jaws backward to create a cutting motion between the posterior edge and the prey's tissue.[10] In order to inject venom, colubridae must chew on their prey.[11] Colubrids can also be proteroglyphous (fangs at the front of the upper jaw, followed by small solid teeth)[4]
Most Colubridae are oviparous (mode of reproduction where an egg is produced that will later hatch) with clutch size varying by size and species of snake. However, certain species of snakes from the subfamilies of Natricinae and Colubrinae are viviparous (mode of reproduction where young are live birthed). These viviparous species can birth various amounts of offspring at a time, but the exact number of offspring depends on the size and species of snake.[4]
Characteristics of Colubridae
editCharacteristics of Colubridae include limbless bodies, left lung that is reduced or absent with or without a tracheal lung, well-developed oviducts, premaxillaries that lack teeth, maxilaries oriented longitudinally with teeth that are solid or grooved, mandible without a coronoid bone, dentary that has teeth, only a left carotid artery, intracostal arteries arising from the dorsal aorta every few trunk segments, no cranial infrared receptors occurring in pits or surface indentations, and optic foramina that typically traverse the frontal–parietal–parasphenoid sutures.[4]
Classification
editIn the past, the Colubridae were not a natural group, as many were more closely related to other groups, such as elapids, than to each other.[12] This family was historically used as a "wastebasket taxon"[6] for snakes that do not fit elsewhere.[13] Until recently, colubrids were basically colubroids that were not elapids, viperids, or Atractaspis.[14]
However, recent research in molecular phylogenetics has stabilized the classification of historically "colubrid" snakes and the family as currently defined is a monophyletic clade,[15][16][17][18] although additional research will be necessary to sort out all the relationships within this group. As of May 2018, eight subfamilies are recognized.[19]
Current subfamilies
editSibynophiinae – three genera
Natricinae – 36 genera (sometimes given as family Natricidae)
- Afronatrix
- Amphiesma
- Amphiesmoides
- Anoplohydrus
- Aspidura
- Atretium
- Blythia[20]
- Clonophis
- Fowlea
- Haldea
- Hebius
- Helophis
- Herpetoreas
- Hydrablabes
- Hydraethiops
- Iguanognathus
- Isanophis
- Limnophis
- Liodytes
- Natriciteres
- Natrix
- Nerodia
- Opisthotropis
- Pseudagkistrodon
- Regina
- Rhabdophis
- Rhabdops
- Smithophis
- Storeria
- Thamnophis
- Trachischium
- Trimerodytes
- Tropidoclonion
- Tropidonophis
- Virginia
- Xenochrophis
- †Neonatrix
Pseudoxenodontinae – two genera
Dipsadinae – over 100 genera (sometimes given as family Dipsadidae)
- Adelphicos
- Adelphostigma
- Alsophis
- Amastridium
- Amnesteophis
- Amnisiophis
- Apographon
- Apostolepis
- Arcanumophis
- Arrhyton
- Atractus
- Baliodryas
- Boiruna
- Borikenophis
- Caaeteboia
- Calamodontophis
- Caraiba
- Carphophis
- Cenaspis
- Cercophis
- Chersodromus
- Chlorosoma
- Clelia
- Coniophanes
- Conophis
- Contia
- Coronelaps
- Crisantophis
- Cryophis
- Cubophis
- Diadophis
- Diaphorolepis
- Dibernardia
- Dipsas
- Ditaxodon
- Drepanoides
- Dryophylax
- Echinanthera
- Elapomorphus
- Emmochliophis
- Enuliophis
- Enulius
- Erythrolamprus
- Eutrachelophis
- Farancia
- Galvarinus
- Geophis
- Gomesophis
- Haitiophis
- Helicops
- Heterodon
- Hydrodynastes
- Hydromorphus
- Hydrops
- Hypsiglena
- Hypsirhynchus
- Ialtris
- Imantodes
- Incaspis
- Leptodeira
- Lioheterophis
- Lygophis
- Magliophis
- Manolepis
- Mesotes
- Mussurana
- Ninia
- Nothopsis
- Omoadiphas
- Oxyrhopus
- Paikwaophis
- †Paleoheterodon
- Paraphimophis
- Phalotris
- Philodryas
- Phimophis
- Plesiodipsas
- Pliocercus
- Pseudalsophis
- Pseudoboa
- Pseudoeryx
- Pseudoleptodeira
- Psomophis
- Ptychophis
- Rhachidelus
- Rhadinaea
- Rhadinella
- Rhadinophanes
- Rodriguesophis
- Saphenophis
- Sibon
- Siphlophis
- Sordellina
- Synophis
- Tachymenis
- Tachymenoides
- Taeniophallus
- Tantalophis
- Thamnodynastes
- Thermophis
- Tomodon
- Tretanorhinus
- Trimetopon
- Tropidodipsas
- Tropidodryas
- Uromacer
- Urotheca
- Xenodon
- Xenopholis
- Xenoxybelis
- Zonateres
Grayiinae – one genus
Calamariinae – seven genera
Ahaetuliinae – five genera
Colubrinae – 93 genera
- Aeluroglena
- Aprosdoketophis
- Archelaphe
- Arizona
- Bamanophis
- Bogertophis
- Boiga
- Cemophora
- Chapinophis
- Chironius
- Coelognathus
- Coluber
- Conopsis
- Coronella
- Crotaphopeltis
- Dasypeltis
- Dendrophidion
- Dipsadoboa
- Dispholidus
- Dolichophis
- Drymarchon
- Drymobius
- Drymoluber
- Eirenis
- Elaphe
- Euprepiophis
- Ficimia
- Geagras
- Gonyosoma
- Gyalopion
- Hapsidophrys
- Hemerophis
- Hemorrhois
- Hierophis
- Lampropeltis
- Leptodrymus
- Leptophis
- Liopeltis
- Lycodon
- Lytorhynchus
- Macroprotodon
- Masticophis
- Mastigodryas
- Meizodon
- Mopanveldophis
- Muhtarophis
- Oligodon
- Oocatochus
- Opheodrys
- Oreocryptophis
- Orientocoluber
- Oxybelis
- Palusophis
- Pantherophis
- †Paracoluber
- Persiophis
- Philothamnus
- Phrynonax
- Phyllorhynchus
- Pituophis
- Platyceps
- Pseudelaphe
- Pseudoficimia
- Ptyas
- Rhamnophis
- Rhinobothryum
- Rhinocheilus
- Rhynchocalamus
- Salvadora
- Scaphiophis
- Scolecophis
- Senticolis
- Simophis
- Sonora
- Spalerosophis
- Spilotes
- Stegonotus
- Stenorrhina
- Stichophanes
- Symphimus
- Sympholis
- Tantilla
- Tantillita
- Telescopus
- Thelotornis
- Thrasops
- Toxicodryas
- Trimorphodon
- Wallaceophis
- Wallophis
- Xenelaphis
- Xyelodontophis
- Zamenis
- †Zelceophis
Sub-family currently undetermined
- Elapoidis
- Gongylosoma
- Lycognathophis
- Oreocalamus
- Tetralepis
- †Ameiseophis[21]
- †Dryinoides
- †Hispanophis
- †Floridaophis[22]
- †Micronatrix
- †Miocoluber
- †Mionatrix?
- †Palaeonatrix
- †Paleofarancia
- †Paraoxybelis
- †Paraxenophis
- †Periergophis
- †Pollackophis
- †Pseudocemophora
- †Nebraskophis[21]
- †Texasophis
Former subfamilies
editThese taxa have been at one time or another classified as part of the Colubridae, but are now either classified as parts of other families, or are no longer accepted because all the species within them have been moved to other (sub)families.
- Subfamily Aparallactinae (now a subfamily of Lamprophiidae,[17] sometimes combined with Atractaspidinae)
- Subfamily Boiginae (now part of Colubrinae)
- Subfamily Boodontinae (some of which now treated as subfamily Grayiinae of the new Colubridae, others moved to family Lamprophiidae as part of subfamilies Lamprophiinae, Pseudaspidinae and Pseudoxyrhophiidae, which are now sometimes treated as families)
- Subfamily Dispholidinae (now part of Colubrinae)
- Subfamily Homalopsinae (now family Homalopsidae)[17]
- Subfamily Lamprophiinae (now a subfamily of Lamprophiidae)[17]
- Subfamily Lycodontinae (now part of Colubrinae)
- Subfamily Lycophidinae (now part of Lamprophiidae)
- Subfamily Pareatinae (now family Pareidae,[17] sometimes incorrectly spelled Pareatidae)[23]
- Subfamily Philothamninae (now part of Colubrinae)
- Subfamily Psammophiinae (now a subfamily of Lamprophiidae)[17]
- Subfamily Pseudoxyrhophiinae (now a subfamily of Lamprophiidae)[17]
- Subfamily Xenoderminae (now family Xenodermidae,[17] sometimes incorrectly spelled Xenodermatidae)[23]
- Subfamily Xenodontinae (which many authors put in Dipsadinae/Dipsadidae)
Fossil record
editThe oldest colubrid fossils are indeterminate vertebrae from Thailand and specimens of the genus Nebraskophis from the U.S. state of Georgia, both from the Late Eocene. The presence of derived colubrids in North America so early on, despite their presumed Old World origins, suggests that they originated even earlier.[1] The Pliocene (Blancan) fossil record in the Ringold Formation of Adams County, Washington has yielded fossils from a number of colubrids including Elaphe pliocenica, Elaphe vulpina, Lampropeltis getulus, Pituophis catenifer, a Thamnophis species, and the extinct genus Tauntonophis.[24]
References
editCitations
edit- ^ a b c P Dennis; A J (2003). Nebraskophis HOLMAN from the Late Eocene of Georgia (USA), the oldest known North American colubrid snake.
- ^ "Colubrid". britannica.com. Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 December 2018. Retrieved 2 December 2018.
- ^ a b c Bauer, Aaron M. [in French] (1998). Cogger, H.G.; Zweifel, R.G. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 188–195. ISBN 978-0-12-178560-4.
- ^ a b c d Vitt, Laurie J.; Caldwell, Janalee P. (2013). Herpetology: An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles (4th ed.). Elsevier Inc. pp. 622–626. ISBN 978-0-12-386919-7.
- ^ a b c Bruna Azara, C. (1995). "Animales venenosos. Vertebrados terrestres venenosos peligrosos para el ser humano en España" (PDF). Boletín de la S.E.A. 11: 32–40. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-14. Retrieved 2016-09-30.
- ^ a b "Venomous" Bites from Non-Venomous Snakes. 2011. doi:10.1016/C2010-0-68461-6. ISBN 978-0-12-387732-1.
- ^ Jackson, K (2003). "The evolution of venom-delivery systems in snakes". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 137 (3): 337–354. doi:10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00052.x.
- ^ Vonk, F. J.; Admiraal, J. F.; Jackson, K.; Reshef, R.; de Bakker, M. A.; Vanderschoot, K.; van den Berge, I.; van Atten, M.; Burgerhout, E.; Beck, A. (2008). "Evolutionary origin and development of snake fangs". Nature. 454 (7204): 630–633. Bibcode:2008Natur.454..630V. doi:10.1038/nature07178. PMID 18668106. S2CID 4362616.
- ^ Fry, B. G.; Casewell, N. R.; Wüster, W.; Vidal, N.; Young, B.; Jackson, T. N. (2012). "The structural and functional diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system". Toxicon. 60 (4): 434–448. Bibcode:2012Txcn...60..434F. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.02.013. PMID 22446061.
- ^ a b Cleuren, Silke G. C.; Hocking, David P.; Evans, Alistair R. (June 2021). "Fang evolution in venomous snakes: Adaptation of 3D tooth shape to the biomechanical properties of their prey". Evolution. 75 (6): 1377–1394. doi:10.1111/evo.14239. PMID 33904594.
- ^ Schmalzried, Scott; Ceretto, Vincent (2024). "Snakes". Encyclopedia of Toxicology. pp. 567–571. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00652-7. ISBN 978-0-323-85434-4.
- ^ Lawson, R.; Slowinski, J.B.; Crother, B.I.; Burbrink, F.T. (November 2005). "Phylogeny of the Colubroidea (Serpentes): New evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 37 (2): 581–601. Bibcode:2005MolPE..37..581L. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.016. PMID 16172004.
- ^ Fry, B.G.; Vidal, N.; van der Weerd, L.; Kochva, E.; Renjifo, C. (2009). "Evolution and diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system". Journal of Proteomics. 72 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.009. PMID 19457354.
- ^ Pough, F. Harvey; Cadle, J. E.; Crump, M. L.; Savitzky, A. H.; Wells, K. (1998). Herpetology. Prentice Hall. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-13-850876-0.
{{cite book}}
:|first2=
missing|last2=
(help) - ^ Pyron, R. A.; Burbrink, F.; Wiens, J. J. (2013). "A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 13 (1): 93. Bibcode:2013BMCEE..13...93P. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93. PMC 3682911. PMID 23627680.
- ^ Figueroa, A.; McKelvy, A. D.; Grismer, L. L.; Bell, C. D.; Lailvaux, S. P. (2016). "A species-level phylogeny of extant snakes with description of a new colubrid subfamily and genus". PLOS ONE. 11 (9): e0161070. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1161070F. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161070. PMC 5014348. PMID 27603205.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Pyron, R. A.; Burbrink, F. T.; Colli, G. R.; de Oca, A. N. M.; Vitt, L. J.; Kuczynski, C. A.; Wiens, J. J. (2011). "The phylogeny of advanced snakes (Colubroidea), with discovery of a new subfamily and comparison of support methods for likelihood trees". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 58 (2): 329–342. Bibcode:2011MolPE..58..329P. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.006. PMID 21074626.
- ^ Zheng, Yuchi; Wiens, John J. (January 2016). "Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Pt B): 537–547. Bibcode:2016MolPE..94..537Z. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.009. PMID 26475614.
- ^ Uetz, Peter. "Colubridae at The Reptile Database". The Reptile Database. EMBL. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- ^ "Blythia reticulata". Archived from the original on 2021-05-21. Retrieved 2021-05-21.
- ^ a b Holman, J. Alan (1982-01-01). "New Herpetological Species and Records from the Norden Bridge Fauna (Miocene: Late Barstovian) of Nebraska". Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies.
- ^ "Floridaophis auffenbergi". Florida Vertebrate Fossils. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ a b Savage, Jay M. (2015). "What are the correct family names for the taxa that include the snake genera Xenodermus, Pareas, and Calamaria?". Herpetological Review. 46 (4): 664–665. Archived from the original on 2016-03-07. Retrieved 2018-05-14.
- ^ Parmley, D.; Walker, D. (2003). "Snakes of the Pliocene Taunton local fauna of Adams County, Washington with the description of a new colubrid". Journal of Herpetology. 37 (2): 235–244. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0235:SOTPTL]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 86000331.
Bibliography
edit- Barbière, Franck; Ortiz, Pablo E.; Pardiñas, Ulyses F.J. (March 2019). "The oldest sigmodontine rodent revisited and the age of the first South American cricetids". Journal of Paleontology. 93 (2): 368–384. Bibcode:2019JPal...93..368B. doi:10.1017/jpa.2018.74. S2CID 135378126.
- Barbiere, Franck; Cruz, Laura E.; Ortiz, Pablo E.; Pardiñas, Ulyses F. J. (2 September 2016). "A new genus of Sigmodontinae (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) from the Pliocene of central Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 36 (5): e1199557. Bibcode:2016JVPal..36E9557B. doi:10.1080/02724634.2016.1199557. hdl:11336/36864. S2CID 89495030.
- Nicoli, Laura (3 September 2015). "New fossil species of the extant genus Lepidobatrachus (Anura, Ceratophryidae) from the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene of central Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 35 (5): e981636. Bibcode:2015JVPal..35E1636N. doi:10.1080/02724634.2015.981636. hdl:11336/46258. S2CID 83574417.
- Agnolin, Federico; Bogan, Sergio; Tomassini, Rodrigo; Manera, Teresa (2014). "New Percichthyidae (Teleostei, Percoidei) from the early Pliocene of the Buenos Aires province (Argentina) and its biogeographical implications". Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. 16: 19–31. doi:10.22179/REVMACN.16.159.
- Zamorano, Martín (20 July 2020). "Diagnosis y nueva descripción de Propanochthus bullifer (Burmeister) (Xenarthra, Glyptodontidae). Consideraciones bioestratigráficas y cronológicas de su procedencia" (PDF). Spanish Journal of Palaeontology. 28 (2): 283–292. doi:10.7203/sjp.28.2.17860.
- Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Kay, Richard F.; Bargo, M. Susana (2012). Early Miocene Paleobiology in Patagonia: High-Latitude Paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-19461-7.
- Albino, Adriana M.; Tomassini, Rodrigo; Brizuela, Santiago (2009). "Presencia del lagarto teiido Tupinambis en la Formación Monte Hermoso de Farola Monte Hermoso, sur de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina)". Ameghiniana (in Spanish). 46 (1): 177–188.
- Bogan, Sergio; Agnolin, Federico (2009). "First fossil record for the family Trichomycteridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes; Pliocene) in the Monte Hermoso Formation, Argentina". Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. 11: 193–198. doi:10.22179/REVMACN.11.259.
- Verzi, Diego H.; Montalvo, Claudia I.; Deschamps, Cecilia M. (January 2008). "Biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Late Miocene of central Argentina: Evidence from rodents and taphonomy". Geobios. 41 (1): 145–155. Bibcode:2008Geobi..41..145V. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2006.09.005.
- Cozzuol, Mario Alberto (July 2006). "The Acre vertebrate fauna: Age, diversity, and geography". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 21 (3): 185–203. Bibcode:2006JSAES..21..185C. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2006.03.005.
- Marshall, Larry G.; Sempere, Thierry (1991). "The Eocene to Pleistocene vertebrates of Bolivia and their stratigraphic context: A review". Revista Tecnica de Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos. 12: 631–652. OCLC 713096859.
External links
edit- Psammophids at Life Is Short, but Snakes Are Long