Modeling Historical Land Cover and Land Use: A Review fromContemporary Modeling
<p>Spatial distribution of the reviewed historical LCLUC models. References: 1. [<a href="#B7-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">7</a>]; 2. [<a href="#B66-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">66</a>]; 3. [<a href="#B65-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; 4.[<a href="#B67-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">67</a>]; 5.[<a href="#B68-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">68</a>]; 6.[<a href="#B39-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; 7.[<a href="#B64-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; 8.[<a href="#B34-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; 9.[<a href="#B62-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">62</a>]; 10. [<a href="#B69-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">69</a>]; 11.[<a href="#B70-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">70</a>]; 12. [<a href="#B37-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; [<a href="#B63-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">63</a>] The last study includes all of Europe (shown as the shaded area in the map).</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Spatial and temporal scales of the reviewed historical LCLUC models. The three groups of models tend to be associated with different scales. References: 1. [<a href="#B7-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">7</a>]; 2. [<a href="#B66-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">66</a>]; 3. [<a href="#B75-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">75</a>]; 4. [<a href="#B65-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; 5. [<a href="#B67-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">67</a>]; 6. [<a href="#B71-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">71</a>]; 7. [<a href="#B80-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">80</a>]; 8. [<a href="#B72-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">72</a>]; 9. [<a href="#B39-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; 10.[<a href="#B81-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">81</a>]; 11. [<a href="#B33-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; 12. [<a href="#B35-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; 13. [<a href="#B64-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; 14. [<a href="#B34-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; 15.[<a href="#B62-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">62</a>]; 16. [<a href="#B82-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">82</a>]; 17. [<a href="#B32-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; 18.[<a href="#B69-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">69</a>]; 19. [<a href="#B70-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">70</a>]; 20. [<a href="#B83-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">83</a>]; 21. [<a href="#B63-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; 22.[<a href="#B37-ijgi-04-01791" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Contemporary LCLUC Models
Modeling Approaches | Description |
---|---|
1. Machine Learning and Statistical Models | Generally automatized, software programs recognize and reproduce the patterns of change. Based on rigorous statistical methods, use observations of changes in order to establish space and time relations between change and drivers. |
2. Cellular | Integrates maps of land cover and land use suitability, taking into account the neighborhood effect and information on the amount of change. |
3. Spatially-Disaggregated Economic Models | Assess the econometric models in a structural and reduced manner to identify the causal relations having an influence on the spatial equilibrium of land systems. |
4. Sector-Based Economic Models | Use models of partial or general structural equilibrium in order to represent the offer and demand of land by economic sectors within the regions based on general economic and commercial activity. |
5. Agent-Based Models | Simulate the heterogeneous decisions and actions of actors of change that interact on the land surface, which lead to LCLUC. |
6. Hybrid Approach | Includes applications combining different approaches in a single model or modeling frame. |
2.1. Inputs
2.2. Training or Calibration of the Model
2.3. Simulation
2.4. Model Assessment
3. Historical LCLUC Models
3.1. Objectives
3.2. Inputs
3.3. Training and Simulation
3.4. Validation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- We identified three large groups of historical models of LCLUC: pattern-based models, agent-based models and hybrid models.
- (2)
- The historical LCLUC models could benefit from the vast experience accumulated by contemporary modeling of LCLUC; however, the inputs required for historical modeling are drastically different and have limitations. Because of the scarceness and characteristics of the inputs used, historical models cannot be totally based on data (data driven), but must rather be largely based either on expert knowledge or on hybrid approaches.
- (3)
- Most models of past LCLUC aim at reconstructing the landscape for a given date rather than at making simulations between dates. This means that historical models are not dynamic through time. Recently, historical simulation has been oriented towards more realistic models of the processes of LCLUC, which allows for better understanding problems, such as environmental deterioration. It is likely that some historical models of LCLUC will adopt that same trend.
- (4)
- Depending on the objective of modeling and inputs, an appropriate modeling approach should be chosen. Agent-based models are preferred when modeling decision-making; pattern-based models are suggested when models aim at reconstructing past landscapes or simulating LCLUC changes.
- (5)
- The quantity and quality of inputs directly determines the performance of the model and limits the possibilities for its evaluation. Awareness must be kept about the fact that modeling is an exercise of the simplification of reality and that results must be interpreted cautiously. However, model assessment, which is a common practice in contemporary models, should be adopted in past modeling and adapted to the modeling objectives.
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lambin, E.F.; Geist, H.J.; Lepers, E. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 2003, 28, 205–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galicia, L.; Romero, A.G.; Mendoza, L.G.; Ramírez, M.I. Cambio de uso del suelo y degradación ambiental. Ciencia 2007, 58, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Geist, H.J.; Lambin, E.F. What Drives Tropical Deforestation? A Meta-Analysis of Proximate and Underlying Causes of Deforestation Based on Subnational Case Study Evidence; Ciaco Printshop (University of Louvain): Rue de Rodeuhaie, Belgium, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Lambin, E.F.; Turner, B.; Geist, H.J.; Agbola, S.B.; Angelsen, A.; Bruce, J.W.; Coomes, O.T.; Dirzo, R.; Fisher, G.; Folke, C.; et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2001, 11, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houet, T.; Loveland, T.R.; Hubert-Moy, L.; Gaucherel, C.; Napton, D.; Barnes, C.A.; Sayler, K. Exploring subtle land use and land cover changes: A framework for future landscape srudies. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Redman, C.L. Los Orígenes de la Civilización. Desde Los Primeros Agricultores hasta la Sociedad Urbana en el Próximo Oriente; Editorial Crítica: Barcelona, Spain, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Axtell, R.L.; Epstein, J.M.; Dean, J.S.; Gumerman, G.J.; Swedlund, A.C.; Harburger, J.; Chakravarty, S.; Hammond, R.; Parker, J.; Parker, M. Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 7275–7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bithell, M.; Brasington, J. Coupling agent-based models of subsistence farming with individual-based forest models and dynamic models of water distribution. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamond, J.M. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Beach, T.; Dunning, N.; Luzzadder-Beach, S.; Cook, D.; Lohse, J. Impacts of the ancient Maya on soils and soil erosion in the central Maya Lowlands. Catena 2006, 65, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denevan, W.M. Una perspectiva histórica sobre el descubrimiento del Campos Elevados (Camellones) prehipánicos. In Agricultura Ancestral Camellones y Albarradas. Contexto Social, usos y retos del Pasado y del Presente.; Valdez, F., Ed.; IFEA: Ecuador, Brazil, 2006; pp. 17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Culbert, T.P. The Classic Maya Collapse; University of New Mexico press: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Yoffe, N.; Cowgill, G.L. The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Haug, G.H.; Günther, D.; Peterson, L.C.; Sigman, D.M.; Hughen, K.A.; Aeschlimann, B. Climate and the collapse of Maya civilization. Science 2003, 299, 1731–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohler, T.A.; Gumerman, G.J.; Reynolds, R.G. Simulating ancient societies. Computer modeling is helping unravel the archaeological mysteries of the American Southwest. Sci. Am. INC 2005, 293, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Springs, K.D.; Litt, M. Civilization, transformation and collapse. J. World Anthropol. Occas. Pap. 2007, 3, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
- Kohler, T.A.; Cockburn, D.; Hooper, P.L.; Bocinsky, R.K.; Kobti, Z. The coevolution of group size and leadership: An agent-based public goods model for prehispanic pueblo Societies. Adv. Complex Sys. 2012, 15, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, B. L., II; Sabloff, J.A. Classic period collapse of the Central Maya Lowlands: insights about human-environment relationships for sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13908–13914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duran-Medina, E.; Mas, J.; Velázquez, A. Cambios en las coberturas de vegetación y usos de suelo en regiones con manejo forestal comunitario y áreas naturales protegidas de México. In Los Bosques Comunitarios de México. Manejo Sustentable de los Paisajes Forestales; Bray, D., Merino, L., Barry, D., Eds.; Instituto de Geografía-UNAM: Coyoacán, Mexico, 2007; pp. 267–299. [Google Scholar]
- Gerber, P.; Steinfeld, H.; Henderson, B.; Mottet, A.; Opio, C.; Dijkman, J.; Falcucci, A.; Tempio, G. Enfrentando el Cambio climático a través de la Ganadería—Una Evaluación Global de las Emisiones y Oportunidades de Mitigación.; Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO): Roma, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- OECD/FAO. OCDE-FAO Perspectivas Agrícolas 2014-2023; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Alves, D.S.; Skole, D.L. Characterizing land cover dynamics using multi-temporal imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1996, 17, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, M.C.; Potapov, P.V.; Moore, R.; Hancher, M.; Turubanova, S.A.; Tyukavina, A.; Thau, D.; Stehman, S.V.; Goetz, S.J.; Loveland, T.R.; et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 2013, 342, 850–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turner, B.L.; Geoghegan, J.; Foster, D.R. Integrated Land-Change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán. Final Frontiers; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez, I.B.; Alonso, C.L. Deforestation research progress; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Mas, J.F.; Sandoval, A.F. Modelación de los cambios de coberturas/uso de suelo en una región tropical de México. Geotrópico 2011, 5, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council. Advancing Land Change Modeling: Opportunities and Research Requirements; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Soares-Filho, B.; Moutinho, P.; Nepstad, D.; Anderson, A.; Rodrigues, H.; Garcia, R.; Dietzsch, L.; Merry, F.; Bowman, M.; Hissa, L.; et al. Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10821–10826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wyman, M.S.; Stein, T.V. Modeling social and land-use/land-cover change data to assess drivers of smallholder deforestation in Belize. App. Geogr. 2010, 20, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, R.R. Driving forces of tropical deforestation: The role of remote dending and spatial models. J. Trop. Goegr. 2006, 27, 82–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geoghegan, J.; Villar, S.C.; Klepeis, O.; Mendoza, P.; Ogneva, M.; Himmelberger, Y.; Chowdhury, R.; Turner, B. L., II; Vance, C. Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: Comparing survey and satellite data. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 85, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pongratz, J.; Reick, C.; Raddatz, T.; Claussen, M. A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl. 2008, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, J.O.; Krumhardt, K.M.; Zimmermann, N. The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2009, 28, 3016–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemmen, C. World distribution of land cover changes during Pre- and Protohistoric Times and estimation of induced carbon releases. Géomorphol. Relief Process. Environ. 2010, 4, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, J.O.; Krumhardt, K.M.; Zimmermann, N.E. The effects of land use and climate change on the carbon cycle of Europe over the past 500 years. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paegelow, M.; Camacho Olmedo, M. Modelling Environmental Dynamics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wu, H.; Finke, P.A. Reconstructing prehistoric land use change from archeological data: Validation and application of a new model in Yiluo valley, northern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 156, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, D.C.; Bergher, T.; Manson, S.M. Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. In Proceddings of an International Workshop, Irvine, CA, USA, 4–7 October 2011; pp. 4–7.
- Griffin, A.F.; Stanish, C. An Agent-based Model of Prehistoric Settlement Patterns and Political Consolidation in the Lake Titicaca Basin of Peru and Bolivia; eSholarship: Oakland, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Macmillan, W.; Huang, H.Q. An agent-based simulation model of a primitive agricultural society. Geoforum 2008, 39, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veldkamp, A.; Verburg, P.H. Modelling land use change and environmental impact. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mas, J.F.; Kolb, M.; Paegelow, M.; Camacho Olmedo, M.T.; Houet, T. Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 51, 94–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khoi, D.D.; Murayama, Y. Forecasting areas vulnerable to forest conversion in the Tam Dao National Park region, Vietnam. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1249–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castella, J.C.; Trung, T.N.; Boissau, S. Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the Northern Mountains of Vietnam: The combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 10, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
- Soares-Filho, B.S.; Cerqueira, G.C.; Pennachin, C.L. DINAMICA—A stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecol. Model. 2002, 154, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verburg, P.H.; de Groot, W.T.; Veldkamp, A.J. Methodology for multi-scale land-use change modelling: concepts and challenges. In Global Environmental Change and Land Use; Dolman, A.J., Verhagen, A., Rovers, C.A., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 17–51. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Vega, A.; Mas, J.F.; Ligmann-Zielinska, A. Comparing two approaches to land use/cover change modeling and their implications for the assessment of biodiversity loss in a deciduous tropical forest. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 29, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takada, T.; Miyamoto, A.; Hasegawa, S.F. Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 25, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares-Filho, B.; Rodrigues, H.; Follador, M. A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land-use change models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 43, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangermano, F.; Eastman, J.R.; Zhu, H. Similarity weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Trans. GIS 2010, 14, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares-Filho, B.S.; Assuncao, R.M.; Pantuzzo, A.E. Modeling the spatial transition probabilities of landscape dynamics in an amazonian colonization frontier. BioScience 2001, 51, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overmars, K.P.; Verburg, P.H.; Veldkamp, T. Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Policy 2007, 24, 584–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuevas, G.; Mas, J.F. Land use scenarios: A communication tool with local communities. In Modelling Environmental Dynamics; Paegelow, M., Olmedo, M.T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 223–246. [Google Scholar]
- Paegelow, M.; Olmedo, M.T.C.; Toribio, J.M. Cadenas de Markov, evalución multicriterio y evaluación multiobjetivo para la modelización prospectiva del paisaje. GeoFocus 2003, 3, 22–44. [Google Scholar]
- Pontius, R. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2000, 66, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar]
- Hagen-Zanker, A. An improved Fuzzy Kappa statistic that accounts for spatial autocorrelation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2009, 23, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verburg, P.H. Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 1171–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mas, J.F.; Pérez-Vega, A.; Clarke, K.C. Assessing simulated land use/cover maps using similarity and fragmentation indices. Ecol. Compl. 2012, 11, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pontius Jr, R.G.; Boersma, W.; Castella, J.t.; Clarke, K.; de Nijs, T.; Dietzel, C.; Duan, Z.; Fotsing, E.; Goldstein, N.; Kok, K.; et al. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2008, 42, 11–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashida, F.M. Archaeology, ecological history, and conservation. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 2005, 34, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houghton., R. The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus 1999, 51, 298–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Dodson, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, X. Increases of population and expansion of rice agriculture in Asia, and anthropogenic methane emissions since 5000BP. Quat. Int. 2009, 202, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, M. Dark ages and dark areas: Global deforestation in the deep past. J. Hist. Geogr. 2000, 26, 28–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohler, T.A.; Cockburn, D.; Hooper, P.L.; Bocinsky, R.K.; Kobti, Z. The coevolution of group size and leadership: An agent-based public goods model for prehispanic Pueblo societies. Adv. Compl. Sys. 2012, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etter, A.; McAlpine, C.; Possingham, H. Historical patterns and drivers of landscape change in Colombia since 1500: A regionalized spatial approach. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2012, 98, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barton, C.M.; Ullah, I.; Mitasova, H. Computational modeling and neolithic socioecological dynamics: a case estudy from southwest Asia. Am. Antiq. 2010, 75, 364–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedick, S.L. Land evaluation and ancient Maya land use in the Upper Belize River area, Belize, Central America. Lat. Am. Atiq. 2012, 6, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaillard, M.J.; Sugita, S.; Bunting, M.J.; Middleton, R.; Broström, A.; Caseldine, C.; Giesecke, T.; Hellman, S.E.V.; Hicks, S.; Hjelle, K.; et al. The use of modelling and simulation approach in reconstructing past landscapes from fossil pollen data: A review and results from the POLLANDCAL network. Veg. Hist. Arch. 2008, 17, 419–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poska, A.; Sepp, E.; Veski, S.; Koppel, K. Using quantitative pollen-based land-cover estimations and a spatial CA_Markov model to reconstruct the development of cultural landscape at Rõuge, South Estonia. Veg. Hist. Arch. 2007, 17, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, J.D.; Nichols, T.; Emmerich, T.; Latek, M.; Cioffi-Revilla, C. Modeling scale and variability in human–environmental interactions in Inner Asia. Ecol. Model. 2012, 241, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldewijk, K.K. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 tears: The HYDE Database. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldewijk, K.K.; Ramankutty, N. Land use changes during the past 300 years. Land Use Land Cover Soil Sci. 2004, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Foley, J.A.; Defries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.; Gibbs, H.K.; et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurtt, G.C.; Frolking, S.; Fearon, M.G.; Moore, B.; Shevliakova, E.; Malyshev, S.; Pacala, S.W.; Houghton, R.A. The underpinnings of land-use history: Three centuries of global gridded land-use transitions, wood-harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 1208–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyle, J.F.; Gaillard, M.J.; Kaplan, J.O.; Dearing, J.A. Modelling prehistoric land use and carbon budgets: A critical review. Holocene 2011, 21, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohler, T.A.; Bocinsky, R.K.; Cockburn, D.; Crabtree, S.A.; Varien, M.D.; Kolm, K.E.; Smith, S.; Ortman, S.G.; Kobti, Z. Modelling prehispanic pueblo societies in theri ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 2012, 241, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, J.T. Exploring complexity with the Hohokam Water Management Simulation: A middle way for archaeological modeling. Ecol. Model. 2012, 241, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peeters, H. Modelling mesolithic-meolithic land-use dynamics and archaeological heritage management: An example from the flevoland polders (The Netherlands). In Beyond the Artifact: Digital Interpretation of the Past; Niccolucci, F., Hermon, S., Eds.; Archaeolingua: Budapest, Hungary, 2010; pp. 14–17. [Google Scholar]
- Barton, C.M.; Ullah, I.I.T.; Bergin, S.M.; Mitasova, H.; Sarjoughian, H. Looking for the future in the past: Long-term change in socioecological systems. Ecol. Model. 2012, 241, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaillard, M.J.; Sugita, S.; Mazier, F.; Kaplan, J.O.; Trondman, A.K.; Broström, A.; Hickler, T.; Kjellström, E.; Kunes, P.; Lemmen, C.; et al. Holocene land-cover reconstructions for studies on land cover-climate feedbacks. Clim. Past Discuss. 2010, 6, 307–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurtt, G.C.; Chini, L.P.; Frolking, S.; Betts, R.A.; Feddema, J.; Fischer, G.; Fisk, J.P.; Hibbard, K.; Houghton, R.A.; Janetos, A.; et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Chang. 2011, 109, 117–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olofsson, J.; Hickler, T. Effects of human land-use on the global carbon cycle during the last 6000 years. Veg. Hist. Arch. 2007, 17, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruddiman, W.F.; Ellis, E.C. Effect of per-capita land use changes on Holocene forest clearance and CO2 emissions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2009, 28, 3011–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemmen, C.; Khan, A. A simulation of the neolithic trnasition in the Indus Valley. Clim. Landsc. Civil. 2012, 198, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, M.A.; Sarson, G.; Sanrson, H.; Shukurov, A. Modelling the Neolithic transition in a heterogeneous environment. J. Arch. Sci. 2010, 37, 2929–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bray, D.B.; Ellis, E.A.; Armijo-Canto, N.; Beck, C.T. The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: A case study of the Maya Zone in Quintana Roo, México. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McEvedy, C.; Jones, R. Atlas of World Population History; Penguin Books Ltd: Middlesex, England, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Aoki, K.; Shida, M.; Shigesada, N. Travelling wave solutions for the spread of farmers into a region occupied by hunter-gatherers. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1996, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, M.; Wang, Z.; Kaplan, J.; Liu, J.; Min, S.; Wang, S. Comparison between reconstructions of global anthropogenic land cover change over past two millennia. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2013, 23, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeFries, R.S.; Field, C.B.; Fung, I.; Collatz, G.J.; Bounou, L. Combining satellite data and biogeochemical models to estimate global effects of human-induced land cover change on carbon emissions and primary productivity. Glob. Biog. Cycl. 1999, 13, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruddiman, W.F. The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Clim. Chang. 2003, 61, 261–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etter, A. Las transformaciones de uso de la tierra y los ecosisemas durante el período colonial en Colombia (1500–1800). In La economía Colonial de Nueva Granada; Meisel, A., Ramírez, M.T., Eds.; TM Editores y Banco de la República, Bogotá: Bogotá, Hungary, 2013; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
- Camacho, M.T.; Paegelow, M.; García Martínez, P. Retrospective geomatic landscape modelling. A probabilistic aproach. In Modelling Environmental Dynamics; Paegelow, M., Camacho Olmedo, M.T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 247–268. [Google Scholar]
- Dean, J.S.; Gumerman, G.J.; Epstein, J.M.; Axtell, R.; Sewdlund, A.C.; Parker, M.T.; McCarroll, S. Understanding Aansazi culture change through agent-based mdeling. In Dynamics of Human and Primate Societies: Agent-Based Modeling of Sdocial and Spatial Processes; Kohler, T.A., Gummerman, G.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; pp. 179–206. [Google Scholar]
- Wainwright, J. Can modelling enable us to understand the rôle of humans in landscape evolution? Geoforum 2008, 39, 659–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zetina Gutiérrez, M.d.G. De la agroecología Maya a la arqueología demográfica: Cuántas casas por familia? Estudios de cultura Maya 2009, 38, 97–120. [Google Scholar]
- Culbert, T.P. Población, subsistencia y el Colapso de los Mayas del Clásico. In Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala; Laporte, J.P., Escobedo, H., Eds.; Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología: Guatemala, Guatemala, 1995; pp. 666–672. [Google Scholar]
- Parker, D.C.; Manson, S.M.; Janssen, M.A.; Hoffmann, M.J.; Deadman, P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2003, 93, 314–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, D.C.; Hessl, A.; Davis, S.C. Complexity, land-use modeling, and the human dimension: fundamental challenges for mapping unknown outcome spaces. Geoforum 2008, 39, 789–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, C.T.; Feinman, G.M.; Editors, G. In Focus: Landscapes over time: Resilience, degradation, and contemporary lessons. Am. Anth. 2005, 107, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheffer, M. Critical Transitions in Nature and Society; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, A.B.; Giesecke, T.; Theuerkauf, M.; Feeser, I.; Behre, K.E.; Beug, H.J.; Chen, S.H.; Christiansen, J.; Dörfler, W.; Endtmann, E.; et al. Quantitative reconstructions of changes in regional openness in north-central Europe reveal new insights into old questions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2012, 47, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trondman, A.K.; Gaillard, M.J.; Mazier, F.; Sugita, S.; Fyfe, R.; Nielsen, A.B.; Twiddle, C.; Barratt, P.; Birks, H.J.B.; Bjune, A.E.; et al. Pollen-based quantitative reconstructions of Holocene regional vegetation cover (plant-functional types and land-cover types) in Europe suitable for climate modelling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 676–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chang-Martínez, L.A.; Mas, J.-F.; Valle, N.T.; Torres, P.S.U.; Folan, W.J. Modeling Historical Land Cover and Land Use: A Review fromContemporary Modeling. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 1791-1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4041791
Chang-Martínez LA, Mas J-F, Valle NT, Torres PSU, Folan WJ. Modeling Historical Land Cover and Land Use: A Review fromContemporary Modeling. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2015; 4(4):1791-1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4041791
Chicago/Turabian StyleChang-Martínez, Laura Alfonsina, Jean-François Mas, Nuria Torrescano Valle, Pedro Sergio Urquijo Torres, and William J. Folan. 2015. "Modeling Historical Land Cover and Land Use: A Review fromContemporary Modeling" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, no. 4: 1791-1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4041791