[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Radar backscatter is not a 'direct measure' of forest biomass

Nature Climate Change volume 2, pages 556–557 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor

Accurately mapping forest carbon now has important financial and livelihood implications for many smallholder farmers, businesses, investors, land-use projects and governments. The urgent need to reduce uncertainties in the carbon cycle, the increasing focus on global sustainable forestry, and the international agenda on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has led to the creation of new communities clamouring for robust methods to map forest aboveground biomass (AGB).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Castel, T., Guerra, F., Caraglio, Y. & Houllier, F. Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 30–41 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan, C. M. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 243–257 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchard, E. T. A. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L23401 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos, J. R., Lacruz, M. S. P., Araujo, L. S. & Keil, M. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 1217–1229 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenqvist, A., Milne, A., Lucas, R., Imhoff, M. & Dobson, C. Environ. Sci. Policy 6, 441–455 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Imhoff, M. L. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 33, 510–518 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Toan, T. et al. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 2850–2860 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Englhart, S., Keuck, V. & Siegert, F. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 1260–1271 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neeff, T., Dutra, L. V., dos Santos, J. R., Freitas, C. D. & Araujo, L. S. Forest Sci. 51, 585–594 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fransson, J. E. S., Walter, F. & Ulander, L. M. H. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38, 720–727 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodhouse, I. H. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 871–877 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this Correspondence are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK

    Iain H. Woodhouse, Edward T. A Mitchard & Casey M. Ryan

  2. Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, Maryland, USA

    Matthew Brolly

  3. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, UN-REDD Programme, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, 00153, Italy

    Danae Maniatis

  4. Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK

    Danae Maniatis

Authors
  1. Iain H. Woodhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward T. A Mitchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Brolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Danae Maniatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Casey M. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain H. Woodhouse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodhouse, I., Mitchard, E., Brolly, M. et al. Radar backscatter is not a 'direct measure' of forest biomass. Nature Clim Change 2, 556–557 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1601

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1601

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing