[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovation and employment: a firm level study of Indian industries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study based on the firm level data for eleven industries for the period ranging from 1998 through 2010 makes an attempt to capture the effect of R&D on employment in the backdrop of the debate on possible tradeoffs between innovation and labour absorption. It also estimates the firm specific time variant total factor productivity growth and technical efficiency and assesses the impact of R&D on these performance indicators. Though the findings are not supportive of a positive relationship between R&D and productivity, the elasticity of employment with respect to R&D is seen to be positive in a number of industries. Even when R&D does not mean actual innovation of technology, it involves processing of byproducts and efforts pursued to bring in an improvement in product quality and efficiency which may be resulting in employment gains. This finding has important policy implications reinforcing the importance of incentives for pursuing R&D on a larger scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Different mechanisms of technological change and effects on jobs emerge in the work of Bogliacino and Pianta (2010).

  2. However, when output is fixed, the shift in technology from being capital intensive to labour intensive would result in deterioration in labour productivity.

  3. Also see Vivarelli (1995) and Pianta (2005).

  4. Vivarelli (2011) argues that innovation has a strong skill-bias.

  5. For example, Whirlpool Of India Ltd. registered a R&D growth of 28.41 %.

  6. This procedure assumes that each firm in a given industry is paying the same wage rate which may not be the case in reality.

  7. Also information on some of the variables which are relevant from the point of view of the firm is not available Though this is an omitted variable model it clearly indicates the lack of a relationship. If the impact were significant then there was a reason to consider other variables before highlighting the result.

  8. Wages are not considered because capital asset is included as a determinant. Since capital itself is a function of wage rental ratio multicollinearity and the problem of double counting would have emerged had we included wage rate in the function.

  9. If the rise in output is more than employment then labour per unit of output may decline in spite of an increase in overall employment.

  10. Results not reported.

  11. Results not shown.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Zilibotti, F. (2001). Productivity differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 563–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E., & Machin, S. (2004). Globalization, skill-biased technological change and labour demand. In E. Lee & M. Vivarelli (Eds.), Understanding globalization, employment and poverty reduction (pp. 39–66). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogliacino, F. (2014). Innovation and employment: a firm level analysis with European R&D scoreboard data. Economia, 15, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2010). Innovation and employment: an investigation using revised Pavitt classes. Research Policy, 39, 799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogliacino, F., Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2012). R&D and employment: an application of the LSDVC estimator using European micro-data. Economics Letters, 116, 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogliacino, F., & Vivarelli, M. (2012). The job creation effect of R&D expenditures. Australian Economic Papers, 51, 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, S. (2008). Economic integration, process and product innovation, and relative skill demand. Review of International Economics, 16, 864–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2006). Multinational firms, innovation and productivity. UK: Edward Elgar Cheltenham.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S. (1987). Development planning: the Indian experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, C. P. (1992). Investment behaviour, economies of scale and efficiency in an import substituting regime: a study of two industries. In A. Ghosh, et al. (Eds.), Indian industrialisation, structure and policy issues. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.-Y., Yu, E. S. H., & Jin, J. C. (2002). Technical progress, urban unemployment, outputs, and welfare under variable returns to scale. International Review of Economics & Finance, 11, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., et al. (1990). Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, F., & Pianta, M. (2006). Demand and innovation in productivity growth, http://www.ec.unipg.it/DEFS/uploads/crespiantaproductivity.pdf.

  • Evenson, R., & Westphal, L. E. (1995). Technological change and technology strategy, ch. 37. In J. Behrman & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics, vol. 3A (pp. 2209–2229). North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fecher, F., & Pestiean, P. (1993). Efficiency and competition in OECD financial services. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productivity efficiency, techniques and applications (pp. 374–385). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldar, B. N. (1986). Productivity growth in Indian industry. Delhi: Allied Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., & Helpman E. (1990). Trade, innovation and growth. The American Economic Review, 80, 2. In: Papers and proceedings of the hundred and second annual meeting of the American Economic Association, May, pp 86–91.

  • Guangrong, T., & Yuanyuan, L. (2009). The affection of independent innovation on employment. Management Science and Engineering, 3, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2008). Employment, innovation and productivity: evidence from Italian microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 813–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. J., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2014). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 35, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2002). The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity of firms: panel data evidence from indian manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics, 69, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, J. (1993). New technologies, employment and labour markets in developing countries. Development and Change, 24, 405–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A. C., et al. (1972). Biased technological progress and labour force growth in a dualistic economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86, 426–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, K. L., & Sahota, G. (1991). Technical efficiency in Bangladesh manufacturing industries. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 19, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Vivarelli M. (2006). The social impact of globalisation in the developing countries. CSGR Working Paper No 199/06, March

  • Mani, S. (2008). Financing of industrial innovations in India: how effective are tax incentives for R&D?. Centre for development studies, Working Paper No. 405

  • Mani, S. (2009). Has India become more innovative since 1991? Analysis of the evidence and some disquieting features, Centre for development studies, Working Paper No. 415.

  • Mitra, A. (1999). Agglomeration economies as manifested in technical efficiency of firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 490–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. (2009). Technology import and industrial employment: evidence from developing countries. Labour, 23, 697–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mureithi, L. (1974). Demographic and technological variables in Kenya’s employment scene. Eastern Africa Economic Review, 6, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M.I. (1993). Innovation and technological spillovers, NBER Working Papers 4423

  • Pack, H., & Todaro, M. (1969). Technological transfer, labour absorption, and economic development. Oxford Economic Papers, 21, 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, B. L., & Siddharthan, N. S. (2006). MNEs, product differentiation, skills and employment: lessons from the Indian experience. In S. R. Hashim & N. S. Siddharthan (Eds.), High-tech industries, employment and global competitiveness (pp. 165–179). New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, M. (2005). Innovation and employment. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of innovation (pp. 568–598). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piva, M. (2003): The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in developing countries: a survey of theoretical models and empirical studies, International Labour Office, Policy Integration Department, International Policy Group, Working Paper No. 15, ILO, Geneva.

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P., & Pyka, A. (2004). Economic development, variety and employment. Revue Économique, 55, 1023–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., & Trieu, H. (1996). The role of R&D in explaining total factor productivity growth in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Santa Cruz: University of California. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.9362&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. (2005). Productivity in developing countries: trends and policies. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M. (1995). The economics of technology and employment: theory and empirical evidence. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M. (2011). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: a survey of the literature, IDB Publications 61058, Inter-American Development Bank

  • Vivarelli, M. (2013). Technology, employment and skills: an interpretative framework. Eurasian Business Review, 3, 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (1995). Productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change in China: a three sector analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 21, 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincerest gratitude to the anonymous referees and Professor Marco Vivarelli for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arup Mitra.

Additional information

The financial support received under the IDRC-TTI grant to pursue this research is gratefully acknowledged.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 13 and 14.

Table 13 Average technical efficiency and R&D/Sales
Table 14 Average TFPG and R&D/sales

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitra, A., Jha, A.K. Innovation and employment: a firm level study of Indian industries. Eurasian Bus Rev 5, 45–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0015-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0015-3

Keywords

Navigation