[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying the relationship between urban forms and carbon emissions using panel data analysis

  • Research article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon emissions are increasing in the world because of human activities associated with the energy consumptions for social and economic development. Thus, attention has been paid towards restraining the growth of carbon emissions and minimizing potential impact on the global climate. Currently there has also been increasing recognition that the urban forms, which refer to the spatial structure of urban land use as well as transport system within a metropolitan area, can have a wide variety of implications for the carbon emissions of a city. However, studies are limited in analyzing quantitatively the impacts of different urban forms on carbon emissions. In this study, we quantify the relationships between urban forms and carbon emissions for the panel of the four fastest-growing cities in China (i.e., Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Guangzhou) using time series data from 1990 to 2010. Firstly, the spatial distribution data of urban land use and transportation network in each city are obtained from the land use classification of remote sensing images and the digitization of transportation maps. Then, the urban forms are quantified using a series of spatial metrics which further used as explanatory variables in the estimation. Finally, we implement the panel data analysis to estimate the impacts of urban forms on carbon emission. The results show that, (1) in addition to the growth of urban areas that accelerate the carbon emissions, the increase of fragmentation or irregularity of urban forms could also result in more carbon emissions; (2) a compact development pattern of urban land would help reduce carbon emissions; (3) increases in the coupling degree between urban spatial structure and traffic organization can contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions; (4) urban development with a mononuclear pattern may accelerate carbon emissions. In order to reduce carbon emissions, urban forms in China should transform from the pattern of disperse, single-nuclei development to the pattern of compact, multiple-nuclei development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Hutyra L (2009) Detecting carbon signatures of development patterns across a gradient of urbanization: linking observations, models and scenarios. Cities and Climate Change

  • Al-mulali U, Binti Che Sab CN (2012) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the Sub Saharan African countries. Energy 39(1):180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WP, Kanaroglou PS, Miller EJ (1996) Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Stud 33(1):7–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (1990) Reducing traffic congestion and its impact on transport energy use in Singapore. Energy Policy 18(9):871–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (1996) Testing for random individual and time effects using a Gauss–Newton regression. Econ Lett 50(2):189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi HB (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data (Third edition). Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D (1996) Energy, quality of life and the environment: the role of transport. Transp Rev 16(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranovskii SD, Thomas P, Adriaenssens GJ (1995) The concept of transport energy and its application to steady-state photoconductivity in amorphous silicon. J Non-Cryst Solids 190(3):283–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bi J, Zhang R, Wang H, Liu M, Wu Y (2011) The benchmarks of carbon emissions and policy implications for China’s cities: case of Nanjing. Energy Policy 39(9):4785–4794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Gibelli M, Rigamonti P (2002) Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol Econ 40(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1998) The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li X, Zheng Y, Guan YY, Liu XP (2011) Estimating the relationship between urban forms and energy consumption: a case study in the Pearl River Delta, 2005–2008. Landsc Urban Plan 102(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christen AN, Coops C, Crawford BR, Kellett R, Liss KN, Olchovski I, Tooke TR, Van Der Laan M, Voogt JA (2011) Validation of modeled carbon-dioxide emissions from an urban neighborhood with direct eddy-covariance measurements. Atmos Environ 45:6057–6069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chun M, Mei-ting J, Xiao-chun Z, Hong-yuan L (2011) Energy consumption and carbon emissions in a coastal city in China. Procedia Environ Sci 4:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S (2009) Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy 37(11):4208–4219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Oguz H, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC, Gazulis N (2005) Diffusion and coalescence of the Houston metropolitan area: evidence supporting a new urban theory. Environ Plan B 32(2):231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe RM, Wolman H, Coleman S, Freihage J (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous Policy Debate 12(4):681–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan J, Wainger LA, Bockstael NE (1997) Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecol Econ 23(3):251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2010) The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J Urban Econ 67(3):404–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Richardson HW (1997) Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? J Am Plan Assoc 63(1):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo R, Zhu Q, Cao X, Ren Z, Li F, Pradhan M, Jin F, Zhou Q, Wu B (2010) GIS-based carbon balance assessment and its application in Shanghai. AIP Conf Proc 1251(1):246–251

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1(2):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han F, Liu Y (2009) Study on the coupling mechanism of urban spatial structure and urban traffic organization. Int J Business Manag 4(7):134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath LS, Smith JE, Skog KE, Nowak DJ, Woodall CW (2011) Managed forest carbon estimates for the US greenhouse gas inventory. J For 109:167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Scepan I, Clarke KC (2002) Remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban landuse. Environ Plan A 34(8):1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden E, Norland IT (2005) Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban Stud 42(12):2145–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Zhang PD, Tian Y, Yuan X, Yang Y (2011) Developing low-carbon economy: actions, challenges and solutions for energy savings in China. Renew Energy 36(11):3037–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Xia B, Yang L (2013) Relationship study on land use spatial distribution structure and energy-related carbon emission intensity in different land use types of Guangdong, China, 1996–2008. Sci World J 2013:15

    Google Scholar 

  • IE Agency (IEA) (2008) World energy outlook 2008 OECD/IEA: 578

  • IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007 the fourth assessment report of IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenelius E (2009) Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. J Transp Geogr 17(3):234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C, Steinberger J, Gasson B, Hansen Y, Hillman T, Havranek M, Pataki D, Phdungsilp A, Ramaswami A, Mendez GV (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Environ Sci Technol 43:7297–7302

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy JR, Laube FB (1996) Automobile dependence in cities: an international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(4–6):279–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu X (2008) Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent-based models for use as a planning tool. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(1):21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Xu Y, Zhou Q, Wang L (2004) Statistical analysis on the relationship between road network and ecosystem fragmentation in China. Prog Geogr 23(5):77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy RH, Byungman Y, Hepinstall-Cymerman J, Alberti M (2011) Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: a case study in the Seattle metropolitan region. Landsc Urban Plan 103:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan R, Asafu-Adjaye J (2007) Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35(4):2481–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makidoa Y, Dhakalb S, Yamagatac Y (2012) Relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions: evidence from fifty Japanese cities. Urban Clim 2(12):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps

  • Muller PO (2004) Transportation and urban form: stages in the spatial evolution of the American Metropolis. Guilford Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsal K. (2007) Comparison of panel cointegration tests. http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de

  • Parker DC, Meretsky V (2004) Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101(2–3):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG, Millones M (2011) Death to kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens 32(15):4407–4429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Fragkias M (2005) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of china with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 20(7):871–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu YQ, Lam NSN (2011) Spatial disaggregation of carbon dioxide emissions from road traffic based on multiple linear regression model. Atmos Environ 45(3):634–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson R, Odenberger M, Johnsson F, Strömberg L (2004) Transportation systems for CO2: application to carbon capture and storage. Energy Convers Manag 45(15–16):2343–2353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thinh NX, Arlt G, Heber B, Hennersdorf J, Lehmann I (2002) Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view to sustainable development. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22(5):475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y-H (2005) Quantifying urban form: compactness versus sprawl. Urban Stud 42(1):141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Waals J (2000) The compact city and the environment: a review. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 91(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41171308 and 41371376), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China (Grant No. 3149001), and the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (Grant No. 41322009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinpei Ou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ou, J., Liu, X., Li, X. et al. Quantifying the relationship between urban forms and carbon emissions using panel data analysis. Landscape Ecol 28, 1889–1907 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9943-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9943-4

Keywords