Abstract
Coughs and sneezes feature turbulent, multiphase flows that may contain pathogen-bearing droplets of mucosalivary fluid. As such, they can contribute to the spread of numerous infectious diseases, including influenza and SARS. The range of contamination of the droplets is largely determined by their size. However, major uncertainties on the drop size distributions persist. Here, we report direct observation of the physical mechanisms of droplet formation at the exit of the mouth during sneezing. Specifically, we use high-speed imaging to directly examine the fluid fragmentation at the exit of the mouths of healthy subjects. We reveal for the first time that the breakup of the fluid into droplets continues to occur outside of the respiratory tract during violent exhalations. We show that such breakup involves a complex cascade of events from sheets, to bag bursts, to ligaments, which finally break into droplets. Finally, we reveal that the viscoelasticity of the mucosalivary fluid plays an important role in delaying fragmentation by causing the merger of the droplet precursors that form along stretched filaments; thereby affecting the final drop size distribution farther downstream.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A better physical understanding of the processes governing pathogen transport is needed to reduce the spread of deadly influenza strains such as H5N1 or H7N9 (CDC 2013; Bourouiba 2013). Infected patients can produce virus-bearing droplets by sneezing, coughing, or even breathing (e.g., Settles 2006). Observations indicate that coughs and sneezes produce ejecta that are well described as a multiphase, turbulent cloud comprising hot, moist air and suspended droplets (Bourouiba et al. 2012, 2014). A theoretical model describing the evolution of the cloud was developed by Bourouiba et al. (2014) and validated against experiments. The turbulent gas-phase dynamics were shown to be critical in enhancing the range of the smaller suspended droplets by delaying their exit from the cloud. This model can be used to assess contamination ranges in various environmental conditions. Inputs for this model include the volume fraction of liquid to gaseous phases and the droplet size distribution. The droplet size spans the micrometer and millimeter scales, but no consensus on the size distribution can be found in the literature. The techniques for measuring expiratory droplet size distributions have included enumeration on glass slides (Duguid 1946), optical counting (Papineni and Rosenthal 1997), aerodynamic droplet sizing (Johnson et al. 2011), interferometric Mie imaging (Morawska et al. 2009), scanning mobility droplet sizing (Yang et al. 2007), and laser diffraction (Zayas et al. 2012). Despite these efforts, discrepancies persist between the reported size spectra. The variability in the composition and physical properties of the ejected salivary mucus is also a major source of uncertainty for all inferences relying on optical characteristics and evaporation rates based on pure water.
Hydrodynamic instabilities of fluid films at or near the exit of the respiratory tract are expected to play a critical role in setting the size distribution of the ejecta. Such fluid fragmentation phenomena are found in industrial applications (Villermaux 2007). In such settings, while the precise form of fluid fragmentation generally depends on the details of the source conditions, it has been reported to involve a cascade to smaller scales, from a fluid volume to sheets, ligaments, and, finally, droplets (Eggers and Villermaux 2008). Relative to industrial flows, the fluid dynamics of violent expirations remains poorly understood. To gain insight into the physics selecting the dominant droplet sizes emitted, we directly image the emissions of droplets with high-speed videography. In Sect. 2, we discuss the possible physical mechanisms involved in the fluid fragmentation accompanying such violent expirations. The experimental setup and the results of our visualization of real human sneezes are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, we describe the anatomy of sneeze ejecta in more detail, with a focus on the type of fragmentation processes leading to droplets.
2 Physical picture and fluid fragmentation
Sneezing and coughing are often caused by an irritation of the nose and then trachea, respectively; this leads to nerve stimulation and the resulting reflex action (James and Burgh 1969). It has been reported that the respiratory changes in a sneeze are analogous to those of a cough, except for the timing of the different phases (Widdicombe 1979). In particular, both a sneeze and a cough consist of an initial irritation, a closure of the glottis, and a rapid increase in intrathoracic pressure. Following the re-opening of the glottis, air is expelled at high flow rates (Banner 1986). For the sneeze, the pharynx also seems to be constricted (Widdicombe 1979); however, the subsequent dynamics remain poorly understood relative to those of the cough. Within the airway system, sneezes and coughs consist of fast airflows interacting with relatively slow moving, thin fluid layers. The majority of the studies of drop size measurement (e.g., Zayas et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2007; Morawska et al. 2009) focus on coughing, talking, or respiration. Turner et al. (1941) used single flash photographs to record sneezes using a dark field imaging setup and highlighted parts of the complex nature of such emissions. Duguid (1946) also studied sneezing; however, the sneeze dynamics examined were presumably altered by the subjects’ ingestion of a dyed solution used for flow visualization.
The respiratory tract is essentially a hierarchical network of branching airway tubes with radii varying from 0.9 cm in the trachea to approximately \(150\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) in the alveoli (Grotberg 1994). In this complex geometry, it is assumed that a combination of Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities can result in the destabilization of these layers into droplets. Such instabilities involve surface tension, viscous, and aerodynamic forces, the relative magnitudes of which determine the final size of the resulting pathogen-bearing droplets. Surface tension and fluid viscosity generally favor larger droplets, while higher air speeds tend to result in smaller droplets. The liquid phase of interest in this problem is a mixture of saliva and mucus, the relative fraction of which is a function of the location within the respiratory tract. Reported physical properties of saliva are close to those of water with density \(\rho = 1000\hbox { kg/m}^3\), dynamic viscosity \(\mu = 1\hbox { mPas}\), and surface tension of \(\sigma = 60\,\hbox {m/N m}\) (Schipper et al. 2007; Stokes and Davies 2007). These fluids are mostly composed of water (97 %) and contain other agents such as salts, proteins, and fatty acids (Bansil and Turner 2006). They are viscoelastic because of the dissolved large glycoprotein mucins or biopolymers they contain (e.g., MUC5B (Dekker et al. 2002)). The relaxation times reported for mucosalivary fluids are \(2.24\,\hbox {ms} \le \lambda \le 76.2\,\hbox {ms}\) (Haward et al. 2011; Kesimer et al. 2010; Raynal et al. 2002). However, major discrepancies and variability in the reported values of relaxation time persist.
When filaments of non-Newtonian fluids with elasticity induced by the presence of polymers are stretched, the polymers initially do not play an important role. They remain coiled, and the solvent solution dominates the dynamics; hence, the thinning is dominated by viscous effects. In the subsequent phase, when the polymers become sufficiently stretched, they resist the surface-tension-driven breakup that would occur via the Rayleigh-Plateau instability in a Newtonian fluid. Instead, filament stretching can be accompanied by the beads-on-a-string structure, which arises when a balance of inertial, capillary, viscous, and elastic forces is achieved (Bhat et al. 2010). Beads on a string are a clear indicator of the influence of viscoelasticity and play a key role in selecting final sizes of the droplets. The Deborah number De quantifies the effect of viscoelasticity by prescribing the relative magnitude of the polymer relaxation time \(\lambda\) and timescale of fragmentation \(\tau\), \(De = \lambda /\tau\). In our experiments, we observed typical mucosalivary ligaments of diameter ranging from 0.409 to 0.952 mm. For such sizes, the capillary time ranges from \(\tau = \sqrt{\rho d^3/\sigma } = 0.97\) to 3.40 ms, leading to \(0.65 \le De \le 78.73\). Other values reported in the literature on saliva include \(0.004 \le De = \lambda /\tau \le 0.5\) (Bhat et al. 2010).
Fluid partial bubbles, also known as fluid bags, are another feature of fluid breakup that appears in a variety of liquid–gas flows. Villermaux and Bossa (2009) and Reyssat et al. (2007) provide a detailed analysis of the dynamics of fluid bags. Typically, a volume of liquid subjected to a net air flow in a particular direction is deformed by differential aerodynamic pressure that tends to flatten the volume into a sheet that expands as it is swept downstream (Fig. 1). The fluid is then transformed by the aerodynamic pressure into a bag structure that expands and thins until it becomes unstable and ruptures. The resulting holes expand at the Taylor–Culick speed (Taylor 1959; Culick 1960). As the holes grow and the liquid shell destabilizes, ligaments form perpendicular to the bag rim surface due to the Rayleigh–Taylor instability of the rim and are stretched (Lhuissier and Villermaux 2012; Scharfman et al. 2013). These ligaments then eventually break into droplets via Rayleigh-Plateau-type instabilities (see Fig. 1).
In this study, we use direct high-speed visualization of sneezes at the exit of the mouth to examine the details of the ejection of mucosalivary fluid subject to an unsteady violent sneeze-induced turbulent flow. Our observations provide insight into the fragmentation dynamics that affect respiratory pathogen transport.
3 Experimental visualizations
3.1 Experimental setup
High-speed videos of sneezes and coughs were recorded using frame rates ranging from 1000 to 8000 fps (Fig. 2). Two monochrome cameras and various lighting configurations were used. First, the head of the subject was positioned in front of a black felt backdrop in order to create a dark field effect (Turner et al. 1941). This approach allows for the droplets to scatter the light toward the cameras (Figs. 3, 4), which enhances the contrast. The light sources surrounded the observation area, but were never directly oriented toward the cameras. This setup was found to be optimal for the visualization of the far-field dynamics of sneezes, including sneeze cloud dynamics. By contrast, droplets at close range could best be visualized by using backlighting through a white diffuser. The fragmentation was recorded using one or two cameras simultaneously. In the latter case, single cameras were positioned above and on the side of the desired imaging area.
3.2 Coughs and sneezes
The set of images in Fig. 3 shows the evolution of cough ejecta from 0.005 to 0.15 s after initiation of the cough. The onset of the coughs or sneezes reported herein is determined by the visual detection of the first droplets or cloud emitted from the mouth. The airflow expulsion lasted approximately 300 ms. A typical sneeze cloud from our visualizations is displayed in Fig. 4. The use of high-speed videography with at least 1000 fps was necessary in order to adequately resolve the dynamics. The set of images in Fig. 4 shows the evolution of the sneeze cloud from 7 ms to 0.34 s after the sneeze began. The airflow expulsion lasted approximately 200–250 ms. Using the flow speeds from our recordings in Figs. 3 and 4, we can estimate the Reynolds number \({{Re}}= Q/(d\nu )\), where d is the mouth diameter, Q is the flow rate, and \(\nu\) is the viscosity of the gas phase. We find \({{Re}}\) to be about \(10^4\) and \(4 \times 10^4\) for coughing and sneezing, respectively. The flow rate was determined by evaluating the total volume of air and droplets exhaled over the duration of the emission. The volume exhaled was estimated by measuring the exhalation lung capacity.
Our visualizations show that distinctly separated cough droplets are present at the exit of the mouth (see Fig. 3c, d for example), while this is not clearly the case for sneeze ejecta (Fig. 4). Figure 4 shows a relatively dense sneeze cloud, with a broader spectrum of droplet or fluid fragment sizes, as remains visible further away from the source (Fig. 4f). The comparison of the two figures (Figs. 3, 4) suggests caution when generalizing the features of coughs to sneezes as is often done in the literature. In particular, it is clear that sneezes induce a fragmentation process that continues outside of the respiratory tract. Given that sneezes have received less attention in the literature, we now focus on characterizing their ejecta in greater detail.
4 Anatomy of sneeze ejecta
Figure 5 shows a sequence of close-up snapshots of sneeze ejecta recorded at 2000 fps. The duration of the sneeze is 150 ms. In addition to the expected droplet ejecta, our experiments reveal the presence of ligaments of various sizes. Here, the largest ligaments are 3 cm in length and are ejected at speeds of up to 35 m/s, with twisting and stretching observed during flight. The droplet sizes in this recording ranged from \(160\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) to one millimeter, with a maximum observed speed of 14 m/s. The effects of viscoelasticity were clearly important as exhibited by the multiple beads-on-a-string structures apparent on the ligaments.
In order to characterize further the fluid breakup and estimate the effect of viscoelasticity on this process, we examine Fig. 6 in more detail. There, a dense field of sneeze ejecta is imaged both from the top and side. The side and top views were recorded at 8000 and 2000 fps with synchronized start times. The total duration of the sneeze was 134.5 ms with an estimated Reynolds number for the gas cloud of \(Re_G=10^5\). We observed a large number of droplet and ligament fragments with the longest ligaments being as wide as the field of view, approximately 12 cm. The continuous breakup of the ligaments into droplets was apparent outside of the respiratory tract. Furthermore, a myriad of other fragmentation processes was revealed.
The first column of Fig. 6 illustrates the expansion of fluid sheets, the bursting of a bag-like fluid structure, and the transition from sheets to ligaments (Sect. 4.1). The second column features the stretching of the residual ligaments and the associated droplet formation (Sect. 4.2). The third column reveals the final stage of the fragmentation process, the pinch-off of the ligaments into droplets. These three phases of fragmentation were observed systematically in the dozens of violent respiratory exhalation recordings.
4.1 Sheet extension and bag burst
In sneezes, we observe the formation of multiple bags of mucosaliva (e.g., Figs. 7, 8, 9). The resolution of the raw images in Figs 7, 8, 9 has been increased using a least-squares approximation for display purposes (Munoz et al. 2001). In Fig. 7, we show an example of multiple expanding sheets after rupture. The white outlines show the bag edges, which are retracting in the directions indicated by the arrows. Residual ligaments from the piercing and retraction of the bags are also apparent. In Fig. 8, a bag located just downstream of the lower lip is displayed. There, as the liquid exits the mouth, the fluid is flattened into a sheet and then expanded and stretched into a bag-like structure.
Figure 9 shows a bag that is in the flattened sheet phase of its growth. This particular bag is deflected downward and acquires little momentum in the downstream direction and subsequently falls below the lower lip. Ligaments bounding the sides of this sheet radiate outward from it as the sheet expands and thins. Estimating a male lung capacity of 1.5 L and using our direct records of sneeze duration of about 250 ms, and mouth diameter of about \(d = 3\,\hbox {cm}\), we estimate the characteristic gas exhalation speed to be \(U \approx 2.2\,\hbox { m/s}\). This leads to a corresponding gaseous Weber number \(We_\mathrm{G} = \rho _\mathrm{G} U^2d/\sigma \approx 2.2\), where \(\rho _G = 0.9782\,\hbox {kg/m}^3\) is the air density (Picard et al. 2008). For individual Newtonian droplets, the critical \(We_G\) for transition to the bag regime is 12 for Ohnesorge number \(Oh_L = \mu /\sqrt{\rho d \sigma } < 0.1\) (Pilch and Erdman 1987). For a Newtonian liquid jet in a crossflow, the transition from column to bag breakup occurs at a gaseous \(We_G\) of 4 (Sallam et al. 2004; Scharfman and Techet 2012; Scharfman et al. 2013).
4.2 Beads on a string and merger
Figure 10 shows droplets, or beads, forming on the elongating ligaments of mucosalivary fluid ejected by the sneeze. The time sequence in Figure 10b shows two consecutive mergers of adjacent beads on the same ligament shown in Fig. 10a. This ligament of mucosalivary fluid is being stretched by the background air flow and has negligible viscous effects, since \(Oh \approx 0.005\). The diameter of this ligament is approximately 0.2 mm, while the mean measured ligament diameter during the course of the sneeze is about 0.6 mm. In this low-viscosity regime, a Newtonian fluid ligament would be expected to fragment via a Rayleigh-Plateau instability on the capillary timescale \(\tau _{RP} = \sqrt{\rho d^3/\sigma }\), where d is the initial diameter of the ligament. For example, the ligament observed in Fig. 10 would be expected to pinch off in approximately \(330\,\upmu \hbox {s}\); however, we see that the breakup is still in progress after more than 13 ms owing to the retarding effects of viscoelasticity. That represents the extension of the filament lifetime by a factor of \(\sim 40\) when compared to that of an identical filament made of pure water. With a Deborah number \(0.65 \le De \le 78.73\) for the ligaments detected, the occurrence of beads on string and merger is expected to alter significantly the final drop size distribution relative to that arising for Newtonian fluids.
5 Discussion
Coughs and sneezes emit turbulent multiphase flows that can contain pathogen-bearing droplets of mucosalivary fluid. Despite recent efforts, no consensus on the size distributions of such droplets is reached in the literature. It is commonly assumed that the droplets are formed within the airway system, with the process of their formation being unreported. Here, we report the results of direct high-speed recordings of the droplets emitted at the exit of the mouth during violent exhalation events. Our study has revealed the rich physics accompanying the fragmentation induced by violent expirations. Our findings indicate the shortcoming of the common belief that the respiratory droplets are formed prior to ejection. Moreover, our findings show the limitations of using indirect measurement techniques tailored to estimate spherical droplet sizes only. In reality, ligaments are suspended in the turbulent cloud and continue to play an important role in shaping the final droplet sizes after ejection. In particular, we showed that violent respiratory exhalations including sneezes involve a sequence of fragmentation processes from mucosalivary fluid sheet formation and extension, to puncture and retraction, to ligament stretching, and, ultimately, to droplet formation. Moreover, we revealed that viscoelasticity plays an important role in retarding the ligament breakup process in time by up to a factor of 40. In addition, viscoelasticity appears to play a major role in the selection of the upper tail of the final size distribution, namely favoring larger drops than expected with a Newtonian fluid under the same fragmentation conditions. This appears to be due to the beads-on-string formation and repeated merger of droplets along the filaments prior to the final separation into isolated droplets. It remains to be clarified how this process influences the lower tail of the size distribution when compared to that of Newtonian fluid under the same fragmentation conditions in unsteady flows such as violent expirations. Namely, it remains unclear whether we would also detect smaller satellite drops created from very thin stretched viscoelastic mucosalivary filaments attached to the larger drops resulting from mergers.
The steps of fragmentation revealed by our study underscore the importance of understanding the physics of the fragmentation process during violent exhalations. The resulting mechanistic understanding should yield insight into the final drop size distribution and help to clarify the origin of the contradictory size distributions reported in the literature. By revealing key fragmentation processes, such as bag burst and mergers of beads on string, that influence the final droplet size distribution, our study is the first step in that direction. A theoretical and analog experimental framework for rationalizing the effect of viscoelasticity on the fragmentation leading to the final sneeze drop size distribution is currently under development. A more detailed analysis of the role of each fragmentation process identified herein in setting the final droplet size distribution is also being investigated to refine our assessment of the risk of contamination by violent expirations.
References
Banner AS (1986) Cough: physiology, evolution, and treatment. Lung 164:79–92
Bansil R, Turner BS (2006) Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions and biomedical applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 11:164–170
Bhat PP, Appathurai S, Harris MT, Pasquali M, Mckinley GH, Basaran OA (2010) Formation of beads-on-a-string during break-up of viscoelastic filaments. Nat Phys 6:625–631
Bourouiba L (2013) Understanding the transmission of H5N1. CAB Rev 17:1–9
Bourouiba L, Dehandschoewercker E, Bush JWM (2012) The fluid dynamics of coughing and sneezing. In: Refereed proceedings of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate 10th healthy buildings conference Brisbane, AU
Bourouiba L, Dehandschoewercker E, Bush JWM (2014) Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing. J Fluid Mech 745:537–563
CDC (2013) Emergence of avian inlufenza A(H7N9) virus causing severe human illness. MMWR 62(18):366–371
Culick F (1960) Comments on a ruptured soap film. J Appl Phys 31:1128–1129
Dekker J, Rossen JWA, Büller HA, Einerhand AWC (2002) The MUC family: an obituary. Trends Biochem Sci 27:126–131
Duguid JP (1946) The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei. J Hyg 44(6):471–479
Eggers J, Villermaux E (2008) Physics of liquid jets. Rep Prog Phys 71(036):601
Grotberg JB (1994) Pulmonary flow and transport phenomena. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 26:529–571
Haward S, Odell J, Berry M, Hall T (2011) Extensional rheology of human saliva. Rheol Acta 50:869–879
James JEA, de Burgh Daly M (1969) Nasal reflexes: section of laryngology. Proc R Soc Med 62(December):1287–1293
Johnson G, Morawska L, Ristovski Z, Hargreaves M, Mengersen K, Chao C, Wan M, Li Y, Xie X, Katoshevski D, Corbett S (2011) Modality of human expired aerosol size distributions. J Aerosol Sci 42:839–851
Kesimer M, Makhov AM, Griffith JD, Verdugo P, Sheehan JK (2010) Unpacking a gel-forming mucin: a view of MUC5B organization after granular release. Au J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:15–22
Lhuissier H, Villermaux E (2012) Bursting bubble aerosols. J Fluid Mech 696:5–44
Morawska L, Johnson G, Ristovski Z, Hargreaves M, Mengersen K, Corbett S, Chao C, Li Y, Katoshevski D (2009) Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities. J Aerosol Sci 40:256–269
Munoz A, Blu T, Unser M (2001) Least-squares image resizing using finite differences. IEEE Trans Image Process 10:1365–1378
Papineni RS, Rosenthal FS (1997) The size distribution of droplets in the exhaled breath of healthy human subjects. J Aerosol Med 10:105–116
Picard A, Davis RS, Glser M, Fujii K (2008) Revised formula for the density of moist air (cipm-2007). Metrologia 45:149–155
Pilch M, Erdman CA (1987) Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Int J Multiphase Flow 13:741–757
Raynal BDE, Hardingham TE, Thornton DJ, Sheehan JK (2002) Gel-forming properties of saliva. Biochem J 296:289–296
Reyssat E, Chevy F, Biance A-L, Petitjean L, Quere D (2007) Shape and instability of free-falling liquid globules. EPL 80(34):005
Sallam KA, Aalburg C, Faeth GM (2004) Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow. AIAA J 42:2529–2540
Scharfman BE, Techet AH (2012) Bag instabilities. Phys Fluids 24(091):112
Scharfman BE, Bush JWM, Techet A (2013) Hydrodynamic instabilities in round liquid jets in gaseous crossflow. In: Proceedings of 25th annual conferences of Institute for Liquid Atomozation and Spray Systems
Schipper RG, Silletti E, Vingerhoeds MH (2007) Saliva as research material: biochemical, physicochemical and practical aspects. Arch Oral Biol 52:1114–1135
Settles GS (2006) Fluid mechanics and homeland security. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:87–110
Stokes JR, Davies GA (2007) Viscoelasticity of human whole saliva collected after acid and mechanical stimulation. Biorhelogy 44:141–160
Taylor GI (1959) The dynamics of thin sheets of fluid. III. Disintegration of fluid sheets. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 253:313–321
Turner CE, Jennison MW, Edgerton EH (1941) Public health applications of high-speed photography. Am J Pub Health Nations Health 31:319–324
Villermaux E (2007) Fragmentation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:419–446
Villermaux E, Bossa B (2009) Single-drop fragmentation determines size distribution of raindrops. Nat Phys 5:697–702
Widdicombe JG (1979) Reflexes from the upper respiratory tract. In: Handbook of physiology: the respiratory system II, pp 363–394
Yang S, Lee GWM, Chen CM, Wu CC, Yu KP (2007) The size and concentration of droplets generated by coughing in human subjects. J Aerosol Med 20:484–494
Zayas G, Chiang M, Wong E, MacDonald F, Lange C, Senthilselvan A, King M (2012) Cough aerosol in healthy participants: fundamental knowledge to optimize droplet-spread infectious respiratory disease management. BMC Pulm Med 12(1):11
Acknowledgments
The authors thank J. Bales, S. J. Lipnoski and the MIT Edgerton Center for access to their equipment. L.B. and J.B. acknowledge the financial support of the NSF (Grant DMS-1022356). L.B. thanks the Reed Funds and NSF (Grant CBET-1546990) for financial support of studies in mucosalivary fluids.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharfman, B.E., Techet, A.H., Bush, J.W.M. et al. Visualization of sneeze ejecta: steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets. Exp Fluids 57, 24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2078-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2078-4