[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Grain shape influence on semiconducting metal oxide based gas sensor performance: modeling versus experiment

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model for sensing with semiconducting metal oxide (SMOX)-based gas sensors was developed which takes the effect of the shape of the grains in the sensing layers into account. Its validity is limited to materials in which the grains of the SMOX sensing layer are large enough to have an undepleted bulk region (large grains). This means that in all experimental conditions, the SMOX properties ensure that the influence of surface phenomena is not extended to the whole grain. The model takes the surface chemistry and its impact on the electrical properties of the sensing material into consideration. In this way, it relates the sensor signal—defined as the relative change of the sensor’s conductance—directly to the concentration of the target gas and also exhibits meaningful chemical parameters, such as the type of reactive oxygen species, the reaction constants, and the concentration of adsorption sites. The validity of the model is confirmed experimentally by applying it to data gathered by measuring homemade sensors in relevant conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams DE (1999) Semiconducting oxides as gas-sensitive resistors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 57:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Afzal A, Cioffi N, Sabbatini L, Torsi L (2012) NOx sensors based on semiconducting metal oxide nanostructures: progress and perspectives. Sensors Actuators B Chem 171–172:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fine GF, Cavanagh LM, Afonja A, Binions R (2010) Metal oxide semi-conductor gas sensors in environmental monitoring. Sensors (Basel) 10:5469–5502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bârsan N, Weimar U (2001) Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors. J Electroceram 7:143–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothschild A, Komem Y (2004) The effect of grain size on the sensitivity of nanocrystalline metal-oxide gas sensors. J Appl Phys 95:6374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamazoe N, Shimanoe K (2008) Roles of shape and size of component crystals in semiconductor gas sensors I. Response to oxygen. J Electrochem Soc 155:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamazoe N, Shimanoe K (2008) Roles of shape and size of component crystals in semiconductor gas sensors II. Response to NO2 and H2. J Electrochem Soc 155:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fort A, Mugnaini M, Rocchi S et al (2010) Metal-oxide nanowire sensors for CO detection: characterization and modeling. Sensors Actuators B Chem 148:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Korotcenkov G (2005) Gas response control through structural and chemical modification of metal oxide films: state of the art and approaches. Sensors Actuators B Chem 107:209–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison SR (1977) The chemical physics of surfaces. Plenum, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Bârsan N, Hübner M, Weimar U (2011) Conduction mechanisms in SnO2 based polycrystalline thick film gas sensors exposed to CO and H2 in different oxygen backgrounds. Sensors Actuators B Chem 157:510–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bârsan N, Schweizer-Berberich M, Göpel W (1999) Fundamental and practical aspects in the design of nanoscaled SnO2 gas sensors: a status report. Fresenius J Anal Chem 365:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hübner M, Bârsan N, Weimar U (2012) Influences of Al, Pd and Pt additives on the conduction mechanism as well as the surface and bulk properties of SnO2 based polycrystalline thick film gas sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 171–172:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hübner M, Pavelko RG, Bârsan N, Weimar U (2011) Influence of oxygen backgrounds on hydrogen sensing with SnO2 nanomaterials. Sensors Actuators B Chem 154:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diéguez A, Romano-Rodríguez A, Morante JR et al (1999) Nanoparticle engineering for gas sensor optimisation: improved sol–gel fabricated nanocrystalline SnO2 thick film gas sensor for NO2 detection by calcination, catalytic metal introduction and grinding treatments. Sensors Actuators B Chem 60:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diéguez A, Romano-Rodríguez A, Alay JL et al (2000) Parameter optimisation in SnO2 gas sensors for NO2 detection with low cross-sensitivity to CO: sol–gel preparation, film preparation, powder calcination, doping and grinding. Sensors Actuators B Chem 65:166–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolae Barsan.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Chemosensors and Chemoreception with guest editors Jong-Heun Lee and Hyung-Gi Byun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rebholz, J., Bonanati, P., Weimar, U. et al. Grain shape influence on semiconducting metal oxide based gas sensor performance: modeling versus experiment. Anal Bioanal Chem 406, 3977–3983 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7502-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7502-0

Keywords

Navigation