Complexity in the context of product design

• Alexander, C. (1964): Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1964.

  Google Scholar 

• Andrásfai, B. (1991): Graph Theory: Flows, Matrices. Bristol: Adam Hilger 1991.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ashby, R. W. (1956): An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall 1956.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baldwin, C. Y.; Clark, K. B. (2000): Design Rules - The Power of Modularity. Vol. 1, Cambridge: MIT Press 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Bollobás, B. (1990): Graph Theory. New York: Springer 1990.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Browning, T. (2001): Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (2001) 3, pp 292-306.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Broy, M. (1998): Informatik – Systemstrukturen und theoretische Informatik 2. 2nd Ed., Berlin: Springer 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruegge, B.; Dutoit, A. H. (2000): Object-Oriented Software Engineering, Conquering Complex and Changing Systems. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Buzan, T.; Buzan, B. (2002): Das Mind-Map-Buch: Die beste Methode zur Steigerung Ihres geistigen Potenzials. 5th Ed., Landsberg: mvg 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarkson, P. J.; Melo, A.; Connor, A. (2000): Signposting for Design Process Improvement. In: Gero, J. S. (Ed.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID 2000), Worcester. Cambridge: Worcester Polytechnic Institute 2000, pp 333-353.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarkson, P. J.; Simons, C.; Eckert, C. (2001): Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design. In: Proceedings of DETC’01: ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: ASME 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Coyle, R. G. (1996): System Dynamics Modelling – A Practical Approach. London: Chapman & Hall 1996.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Cross, N. (2000): Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. 3rd Ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Daenzer, W. F.; Huber, F. (1999): Systems Engineering: Methodik und Praxis. 10th Ed., Zürich: Verl. Industrielle Organisation 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Danilovic, M.; Sandkull, B. (2002): Managing Complexity and Uncertainty in a Multiproject Environment. In: Proceedings of the 2002 5th International Conference of the International Research Network on Organizing by Projects, Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Erasmus University 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Danilovic, M.; Browning, T. (2004): A Formal Approach for Domain Mapping Matrices (DMM) to Complement Design Structure Matrices (DSM). In: Proceedings of the 6th Design Structure Matrix (DSM) International Workshop, Cambridge. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Engineering Design Centre 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Di Battista, G.; Eades, P.; Tamassia, R.; Tollis, I. G. (1999): Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1999.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dörner, D. (2000): Die Logik des Misslingens. Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Ehrlenspiel, K. (2007): Integrierte Produktentwicklung – Methoden für Prozessorganisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion. 3rd Ed. München: Hanser 2007.

  Google Scholar 

• El-Haik, B.; Yang, K. (1999): The Components of Complexity in Engineering Design. IIE Transactions 31 (1999) 10, pp 925-934.

  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, A.; Erixon, G. (1999): Controlling Design Variants – Modular Product Platforms. New York: ASME Press 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Even, S. (1979): Graph Algorithms. Potomac: Computer Science Press 1979.

  Google Scholar 

• Fayyad, U.; Grinstein, G.; Wierse, A. (2002): Information Visualization in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. San Diego: Academic Press 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Firchau, N. L. (2003): Variantenoptimierende Produktgestaltung. Göttingen: Cuvillier 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Flanagan, T. L.; Eckert, C. M.; Smith, J.; Eger, T.; Clarkson, P. J. (2003): A Functional Analysis of Change Propagation. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 03), Stockholm. Stockholm: Design Society 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Foulds, L. R. (1992): Graph Theory Applications. New York: Springer 1992.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Franke, H.-J.; Hesselbach, J.; Firchau, N. L.; Huch, B. (2002): Variantenmanagement in der Einzel- und Kleinserienfertigung. München: Hanser 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Gomez, P.; Probst, G. (1997): Die Praxis des ganzheitlichen Problemlösens. 2nd Ed., Bern: Paul Haupt 1997.

  Google Scholar 

• Grose, D. L. (1994): Reengineering the Aircraft Design Process. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AIAA/USA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach. Panama City Beach, USA: NASA 1994.

  Google Scholar 

• Gross, J. L.; Yellen, J. (2006): Graph Theory and its Applications. 2nd Ed., Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC 2006.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Hangos, K. M.; Cameron, I. T. (2001): Process Modelling and Model Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Hartigan, J. A. (1975): Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1975.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Jarratt, T. (2004): A Model-Based Approach to Support the Management of Engineering Change. Cambridge (UK): University of Cambridge, Diss. 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Kossiakoff, A.; Sweet, W. N. (2003): Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Köster, O. (1998): Komplexitätsmanagement in der Industrie. Wiesbaden: DUV 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• Krishnan, V.; Eppinger, S. D.; Whitney, D. E. (1997): Simplifying Iterations in Cross-Functional Design Decision Making. Journal of Mechanical Design 119 (1997) 4, pp 485-493.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kusiak, A. (1999): Engineering Design – Products, Processes and Systems. San Diego: Academic Press 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Kusiak, A. (2000): Computational Intelligence in Design and Manufacturing. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindemann, U. (2007a): Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte. 2nd Ed., Berlin: Springer 2007.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindemann, U.; Kleedörfer, R.; Gerst, M. (1998): The Development Department and Engineering Change Management. In: Frankenberger, E.; Badke-Schaub, P.; Birkhofer, H. (Eds.): Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development. London: Springer 1998, pp 169-182.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindemann, U.; Maurer, M.; Kreimeyer, M. (2005): Intelligent Strategies for Structuring Products. In: Clarkson, J.; Huhtala, M. (Eds.): Engineering Design – Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Engineering Design Centre 2005, pp 106-115.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindemann, U.; Reichwald, R.; Zäh, M. F. (2006): Individualisierte Produkte – Komplexität beherrschen in Entwicklung und Produktion. Berlin: Springer 2006.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Malik, F. (2003): Strategie des Managements komplexer Systeme. Bern: Haupt 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Malmqvist, J. (2002): A Classification of Matrix-Based Methods for Product Modeling. In: Marjanovic, D. (Ed.): Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference 2002 (DESIGN02), Cavtat-Dubrovnik. Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia: Design Society 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Maurer, M.; Lindemann, U. (2007): Facing Multi-Domain Complexity in Product Development. Cidad Working Paper Series 3 (2007) 1, pp 1-12.

  Google Scholar 

• NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (1995): NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. SP-6105, http://ldcm.nasa.gov/library/Systems_Engineering_Handbook.pdf, Taken: 21.04.2008.

• Pahl, G.; Beitz, W. (1996): Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 2nd Ed., London: Springer 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Piller, F. T. (2001): Mass Customization: Ein wettbewerbsstrategisches Konzept im Informationszeitalter. 2nd Ed.,Wiesbaden: Gabler 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Piller, F. T.; Waringer, D. (1999): Modularisierung in der Automobilindustrie – neue Formen und Prinzipien. Modular Sourcing, Plattformkonzept und Fertigungssegmentierung als Mittel des Komplexitätsmanagements. Aachen: Shaker 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Pimmler, T. U.; Eppinger, S. D. (1994): Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Minneapolis. Minneapolis, USA: ASME 1994.

  Google Scholar 

• Pine, J. B. II (1993): Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press 1993.

  Google Scholar 

• Probst, G.; Gomez, P. (1991): Vernetztes Denken: Ganzheitliches Führen in der Praxis. Wiesbaden: Gabler 1991.

  Google Scholar 

• Puhl, H. (1999): Komplexitätsmanagement. Kaiserslautern: Univ. Kaiserslautern, Diss. 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Pulm, U. (2004): Eine systemtheoretische Betrachtung der Produktentwicklung. München: Dr. Hut 2004. (Produktentwicklung München, Band 56), Also München: TU, Diss. 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Rapp, T. (1999): Produktstrukturierung. Wiesbaden: Gabler 1999. Also St. Gallen: Univ. St. Gallen, Diss. 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Riedl, R. (2000): Strukturen der Komplexität – Eine Morphologie des Erkennens und Erklärens. Berlin: Springer 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Sabbaghian, N.; Eppinger, S.; Murman, E. (1998): Product Development Process Capture & Display Using Web-based Technologies. In: 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, San Diego. San Diego, USA: IEEE 1998, pp 2664–2669.

  Google Scholar 

• Schuh, G.; Schwenk, U. (2001): Produktkomplexität managen. München: Hanser 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharman, D. M.; Yassine, A. (2004): Characterizing Complex Product Architectures. Systems Engineering 7 (2004) 1, pp 35-60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sosa, M. E.; Eppinger, S. D.; Rowles, C. M. (2003): Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions. Journal of Mechanical Design 125 (2003) 2, pp 240-252.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Soukup, T.; Davidson, I. (2002): Visual Data Mining: Techniques and Tools for Data Visualization and Mining. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Steward, D. (1981): The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 28 (1981) 3, pp 79-83.

  Google Scholar 

• Strong, M. B. (2002): Tools and Metrics for Evaluating Modular Product Concepts Based on Strategic Objectives. Brigham: Brigham Young University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Master Thesis 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Suh, N. P. (1988): The Principles of Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988.

  Google Scholar 

• Ulrich, K.; Eppinger, S. (1995): Product Design and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill 1995.

  Google Scholar 

• Ulrich, H.; Probst, G. (2001): Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln – Ein Brevier für Führungskräfte. Bern: Paul Haupt 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Vester, F. (2000): Die Kunst vernetzt zu denken. Stuttgart: DVA 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Vester, F.; Hesler, A. (1980): Sensitivitätsmodell. Frankfurt a. M: Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain 1980.

  Google Scholar 

• Ware, C. (2004): Information Visualization – Perception for Design. 2nd Ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Wasson, C. S. (2006): System Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience 2006.

  Google Scholar 

• Weber, C. (2005): What Is “Complexity”? In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 05), Melbourne. Melbourne: Institution of Engineers 2005.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinberg, G. M. (1975): An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. New York: Wiley 1975.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiener, N. (1948): Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Technology Press 1948.

  Google Scholar 

• Wildemann, H.; Ann, C.; Broy, M.; Günthner, W. A.; Lindemann, U. (2007): Plagiatschutz – Handlungsspielräume der produzierenden Industrie gegen Produktpiraterie. München: TCW Transfer-Centrum GmbH & Co. KG 2007.

  Google Scholar 

Download references