Duration of frozen days show a strong decline in the Northern Hemisphere mainly driven by autumn temperature increase
-
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
-
PUBLIC SUMMARY
-
Frozen days in the Northern Hemisphere have decreased by 0.17 days per year since 1990.
The greatest declines were observed in Belarus, Ukraine, Alaska, and the Yukon region in Canada.
Rising autumn temperatures, spring precipitation and vegetation changes primarily drive this decline.
The reduction in frozen days s is expected to accelerate for the highest and moderate emission scenarios.
-
-
ABSTRACT
Thawing permafrost releases methane and carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, contributing to positive feedback loop in global warming. Therefore, accurately monitoring changes in the permafrost freeze–thaw status is imperative. However, the spatiotemporal evolution and potential driving factors remain elusive. Here, we investigated the freeze–thaw status and driving factors by developing novel machine learning models trained on satellite and in situ observations in the Northern Hemisphere. We find that the frozen duration decreased on average by 0.17 days/yr since 1990 with the highest decrease of approximately up to 1.0 days/yr in parts of Belarus and Ukraine, followed by the Yukon region in Canada and Alaska. This decrease is primarily driven by temperatures in boreal autumn and spring and by precipitation and vegetation cover in boreal spring. The frozen duration is projected to decline further with reduction rates doubling until 2050 for the highest and moderate emission scenarios. -
-
REFERENCES
[1] Dobinski W. (2011). Permafrost. Earth-Science Rev. 108:158−169. DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.007 [2] Schuur E. A., McGuire A. D., Schadel C., et al. (2015). Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520:171−179. DOI:10.1038/nature14338 [3] Biskaborn B. K., Smith S. L., Noetzli J., et al. (2019). Permafrost is warming at a global scale. Nat. Commun. 10:264. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-08240-4 [4] Running S. W., Way J., McDonald K., et al. (1999). Radar remote sensing proposed for monitoring freeze‐thaw transitions in boreal regions. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 80 :213−221. [5] Gao B., Yang D., Qin Y., et al. (2018). Change in frozen soils and its effect on regional hydrology, upper Heihe basin, northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. The Cryosphere 12:657−673. DOI:10.5194/tc-12-657-2018 [6] Liu Z., Kimball J. S., Ballantyne A. P., et al. (2022). Respiratory loss during late-growing season determines the net carbon dioxide sink in northern permafrost regions. Nat. Commun. 13:5626. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-33293-x [7] Turetsky M. R., Abbott B. W., Jones M. C., et al. (2020). Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw. Nat. Geosci. 13:138−143. DOI:10.1038/s41561-019-0526-0 [8] Zimov S. A., Schuur E. A. G. and Chapin F. S. (2006). Permafrost and the Global Carbon Budget. Science 312:1612−1613. DOI:10.1126/science.1128908 [9] Walter Anthony K. M., Anthony P., Grosse G., et al. (2012). Geologic methane seeps along boundaries of Arctic permafrost thaw and melting glaciers. Nat. Geosci. 5:419−426. DOI:10.1038/ngeo1480 [10] Haeberli W. and Beniston M. (1998). Climate change and its impacts on glaciers and permafrost in the alps. Ambio 27:258−265. [11] Teufel B. and Sushama L. (2019). Abrupt changes across the Arctic permafrost region endanger northern development. Nat. Clim. Change 9:858−862. DOI:10.1038/s41558-019-0614-6 [12] IPCC (2022). Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. [13] Smith S. L., O’Neill H. B., Isaksen K., et al. (2022). The changing thermal state of permafrost. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3:10−23. DOI:10.1038/s43017-021-00240-1 [14] Atchley A. L., Painter S. L., Harp D. R., et al. (2015). Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83). Geosci. Model Dev. 8 :2701-2722. DOI:10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015. [15] Oldenborger G. A., Short N. and LeBlanc A.-M. (2022). Permafrost thaw sensitivity prediction using surficial geology, topography, and remote-sensing imagery: a data-driven neural network approach. Can. J. of Earth Sci. 59:897−913. DOI:10.1139/cjes-2021-0117 [16] Gao H., Nie N., Zhang W., et al. (2020). Monitoring the spatial distribution and changes in permafrost with passive microwave remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 170:142−155. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.10.011 [17] Zhang T. and Armstrong R. L. (2001). Soil freeze/thaw cycles over snow-free land detected by passive microwave remote sensing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28:763−766. DOI:10.1029/2000GL011952 [18] Li T., Shen H., Yuan Q., et al. (2017). Estimating ground-level PM2.5 by fusing satellite and station observations: a geo-intelligent deep learning approach. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 :11,985-911,993. DOI:/10.1002/2017GL075710. [19] Ma H., Zeng J., Zhang X., et al. (2024). Surface soil moisture from combined active and passive microwave observations: Integrating ASCAT and SMAP observations based on machine learning approaches. Remote Sens. Environ. 308:114197. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114197 [20] Alerskans E., Zinck A.-S. P., Nielsen-Englyst P., et al. (2022). Exploring machine learning techniques to retrieve sea surface temperatures from passive microwave measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 281 . DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2022.113220. [21] Xiao X., Zhang T., Zhong X., et al. (2018). Support vector regression snow-depth retrieval algorithm using passive microwave remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 210:48−64. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.008 [22] Cuo L., Zhang Y., Bohn T. J., et al. (2015). Frozen soil degradation and its effects on surface hydrology in the northern Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120:8276−8298. DOI:10.1002/2015JD023193 [23] Dai L., Guo X., Zhang F., et al. (2019). Seasonal dynamics and controls of deep soil water infiltration in the seasonally-frozen region of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. J. Hydrol. 571:740−748. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.021 [24] Heijmans M. M., Magnússon R. Í., Lara M. J., et al. (2022). Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost. Nat. Rev. Earth Enviro. 3:68−84. DOI:10.1038/s43017-021-00233-0 [25] Lehrsch G., Sojka R., Carter D., et al. (1991). Freezing effects on aggregate stability affected by texture, mineralogy, and organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1401−1406. DOI:10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500050033x [26] Yuan Q., Shen H., Li T., et al. (2020). Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges. Remote Sens. Environ. 241:111716. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 [27] Polikar R. (2012). Ensemble learning. Ensemble machine learning: Methods and applications, pp:1-34. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_1. [28] Yang J., Jiang L., Lemmetyinen J., et al. (2021). Improving snow depth estimation by coupling HUT-optimized effective snow grain size parameters with the random forest approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 264:112630. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112630 [29] Xu Y., Wang L., Ma Z., et al. (2019). Spatially explicit model for statistical downscaling of satellite passive microwave soil moisture. IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens. 58:1182−1191. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2019.2944421 [30] Ni J., Wu T., Zhu X., et al. (2021). Simulation of the present and future projection of permafrost on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau with statistical and machine learning models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 126:e2020JD033402. DOI:10.1029/2020JD033402 [31] Siewert M. B. (2018). High-resolution digital mapping of soil organic carbon in permafrost terrain using machine learning: a case study in a sub-Arctic peatland environment. Biogeosciences 15:1663−1682. DOI:10.5194/bg-15-1663-2018 [32] Sagi O. and Rokach L. (2018). Ensemble learning: A survey. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8:e1249. DOI:10.1002/widm.1249 [33] Yang Q., Kim J., Cho Y., et al. (2023). A synchronized estimation of hourly surface concentrations of six criteria air pollutants with GEMS data. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6 :94 . DOI:10.1038/s41612-023-00407-1. [34] Reichstein M., Camps-Valls G., Stevens B., et al. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566:195−204. DOI:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 [35] Liu X., Pei F., Wen Y., et al. (2019). Global urban expansion offsets climate-driven increases in terrestrial net primary productivity. Nat. Commun. 10:5558. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-13462-1 [36] Webb E. E., Liljedahl A. K., Cordeiro J. A., et al. (2022). Permafrost thaw drives surface water decline across lake-rich regions of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 12:841−846. DOI:10.1038/s41558-022-01455-w [37] Lundberg, S. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874. [38] Kim Y., Kimball J. S., Glassy J., et al. (2017). An extended global Earth system data record on daily landscape freeze–thaw status determined from satellite passive microwave remote sensing. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9:133−147. DOI:10.5194/essd-9-133-2017 [39] Kim Y., Kimball J. S., McDonald K. C., et al. (2011). Developing a global data record of daily landscape freeze/thaw status using satellite passive microwave remote sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49:949−960. DOI:10.1109/tgrs.2010.2070515 [40] Hu T., Zhao T., Zhao K., et al. (2019). A continuous global record of near-surface soil freeze/thaw status from AMSR-E and AMSR2 data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 40:6993−7016. DOI:10.1080/01431161.2019.1597307 [41] Amante C. and Eakins B. W. (2009). ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model : procedures, data sources and analysis. [42] Meehl G. A., Boer G. J., Covey C., et al. (2000). The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81:313−318. DOI:2.3.CO;2">10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0313:TCMIPC>2.3.CO;2. [43] Eyring V., Bony S., Meehl G. A., et al. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9:1937−1958. DOI:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 [44] Meinshausen M., Nicholls Z. R. J., Lewis J., et al. (2020). The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13:3571−3605. DOI:10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020 [45] Friedl M. A., Sulla-Menashe D., Tan B., et al. (2010). MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 114:168−182. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016 [46] MARKUS KOTTEK, JÜRGEN GRIESER, CHRISTOPH BECK, et al. (2006). World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 15:259−263. DOI:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 [47] Obu J., Westermann S., Bartsch A., et al. (2019). Northern Hemisphere permafrost map based on TTOP modelling for 2000–2016 at 1 km2 scale. Earth Sci. Rev. 193:299−316. DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.023 [48] Hengl T., Mendes de Jesus J., Heuvelink G. B. M., et al. (2017). SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12:e0169748. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 [49] Belgiu M. and Drăguţ L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 114:24−31. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 [50] Chen T. and Guestrin C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery. [51] Ke G., Meng Q., Finley T., et al. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html -
ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Cite this article:
Yuan Q., Zhong W., Yang Q., et al. (2025). Duration of frozen days show a strong decline in the Northern Hemisphere mainly driven by autumn temperature increase. The Innovation Geoscience 3:100118. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100118
Figures(6)
Article Metrics
Relative Articles
Export File
Citation
Yuan Q., Zhong W., Yang Q., et al. (2025). Duration of frozen days show a strong decline in the Northern Hemisphere mainly driven by autumn temperature increase. The Innovation Geoscience 3:100118. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100118
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
Spatial distribution of accuracy for (A) the original MeASUREs product and (B) the product corrected by the stacking model.
-
Figure 2.
Spatial distribution and change rate of freeze-thaw status
-
Figure 3.
Impact of ST and permafrost type
-
Figure 4.
Variable importance in the environmental response model
-
Figure 5.
Freeze–thaw status change under three different emission scenarios
-
Figure 6.
Variation trends of the frozen durations under three SSPs.
Twitter